Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:06:34.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Shadows of the Past and the Work of the Future: Frederick Douglass's Temporal Theory of Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2021

Nathan Pippenger
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Throughout his career, Frederick Douglass linked the achievement of an egalitarian, multiracial democracy to Americans’ perception of their collective past and future. In so doing, I argue, Douglass developed a distinctive, temporal account of democratic peoplehood. For Douglass, temporal continuity lent force and content to demands for equality—demands which would succeed only if the whole demos cultivated a specific orientation to its collective past, present, and future. Douglass offers a productive contrast to contemporary democratic theory, which often misses the importance of temporality suggested by his account and thereby risks surrendering its powerful egalitarian resources. Moreover, temporality provides a new lens on what many interpreters see as an episode of inconsistency in Douglass's thought: his brief, quickly abandoned contemplation of colonization proposals in the spring of 1861. Ultimately, Douglass turned to temporality in order to decide whether democracy for African Americans required affiliation with, or disaffiliation from, the United States.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , Spring 2021 , pp. 219 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Notre Dame.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For their thoughtful guidance on this paper, I thank Richard Ashcroft, Kevin Duong, Nina Hagel, Desmond Jagmohan, Simon Stow, the journal's anonymous reviewers, and its editor, Ruth Abbey. Previous versions were presented at the Berkeley Graduate Political Theory Workshop and at meetings of the APSA and the Association for Political Theory. This research was funded by a Naval Academy Volgenau Fellowship. The views expressed are the author's and do not reflect the official position of the U.S. Naval Academy, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.

References

1 Laski, Gregory, Untimely Democracy: The Politics of Progress after Slavery (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018), 90Google Scholar.

2 Hooker, Juliet, “‘A Black Sister to Massachusetts’: Latin America and the Fugitive Democratic Ethos of Frederick Douglass,” American Political Science Review 109, no. 4 (Nov. 2015): 690, 692CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541500043X.

3 Ibid., 691.

4 Ibid., 693.

5 Douglass, Frederick, “Our Composite Nationality: An Address Delivered in Boston, Massachusetts, on 7 December 1869,” in The Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One: Speeches, Debates, and Interviews, vol. 4, 1864–1880, ed. Blassingame, John W. and McKivigan, John R. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991), 256Google Scholar.

6 Ibid. While a full discussion of Douglass's views on immigration and settler colonialism is beyond the scope of this article, his dedication to “composite nationality” suggests an expansive principle of inclusion. Nonetheless, Douglass's treatment of these two issues is complicated. While in the context of immigration he optimistically invoked the broad wings of an American eagle, he predicted on one occasion, in an 1866 speech to a white audience, that Native Americans would “die out” and that they “[refuse] your civilization.” However, in a March 1854 edition of Frederick Douglass’ Paper, we find an article (almost certainly by Douglass) protesting a similar declaration, by Indiana Senator John Pettit, that the “doom” of Native Americans was “inevitable.” The article scorns this view: “With whisky, gunpowder, small-pox, bad faith and fraud, you have robbed the poor Indian of home and country. . . . [T]hus poisoned they die, mocked in their death by the sanctimonious whine, that their destruction is the work of the Almighty. The soul sickens over such shocking blasphemy, and the pen quivers with moral indignation, unable to write in terms suitably severe, in dealing with such a monster of wickedness.” On Douglass's 1866 remarks, which David Blight calls “astounding” and attributes to the “seductions” of a “marketplace for racism [that] was diverse and terrifying,” see Blight, David W., Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2018), 486Google Scholar. See also Frederick Douglass, “National Depravity,” Frederick Douglass’ Paper, March 3, 1854, Library of Congress, Frederick Douglass Newspapers Collection, 1847 to 1874, https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn84026366/1854-03-03/ed-1/?sp=2. A similar denunciation appears in Douglass, Frederick, “We Are in the Midst of a Moral Revolution: An Address Delivered in New York, New York, on 10 May 1854,” in The Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One: Speeches, Debates, and Interviews, vol. 2, 1847–1854, ed. Blassingame, John W. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982), 487–88Google Scholar.

7 Roberts, Neil, “Introduction: Political Thought in the Shadow of Douglass,” in A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass, ed. Roberts, Neil (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2018), 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Frederick Douglass, “What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July? An Address Delivered in Rochester, New York, on 5 July, 1852,” in Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One, 2:368.

9 Ibid., 366 (emphasis added).

10 Ibid.

11 Ibid., 360 (emphasis added).

12 Ibid., 367.

13 Ibid., 368.

14 Ibid., 386.

15 Ibid., 369.

16 Bennett, Nolan, “To Narrate and Denounce: Frederick Douglass and the Politics of Personal Narrative,” Political Theory 44, no. 2 (April 2016): 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591714549075. Emphasis added.

17 See Burin, Eric, Slavery and the Peculiar Solution: A History of the American Colonization Society (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2008)Google Scholar.

18 Proposals ranged from voluntary to compulsory emigration; black opposition was widespread and most frequently directed against feared or actual proposals for the latter. See Power-Greene, Ousmane K., Against Wind and Tide: The African American Struggle against the Colonization Movement (New York: New York University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Douglass's opposition extended to voluntary schemes as well. See, for instance, Douglass, “What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?,” 372.

19 Frederick Douglass, “The Free Negro's Place Is in America: An Address Delivered in Buffalo, New York, on 18 September 1851,” in Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One, 2:340.

20 Frederick Douglass to Benjamin Coates, April 17, 1856, in The Frederick Douglass Papers, Series Three: Correspondence, vol. 2, 1853–1865, ed. John R. McKivigan (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018), 183.

21 Allen, Danielle S., Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004), 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Ibid., 29.

23 Ibid., 155. Juliet Hooker has argued that Allen's view leads to a “problematic reification of democratic sacrifice as the paradigmatic example of black political excellence/civic virtue,” which “demands of racially subordinated groups that they pursue political projects aimed at making the entire community more just and free.” Hooker worries that “fulfilling such obligations could come at the expense of their own interests and claims to justice,” and asks: “Moreover, at what point does it become unjust or indeed un-democratic, to expect citizens to continue to peacefully acquiesce to repeated political losses?” See Hooker, Juliet, “Black Lives Matter and the Paradoxes of U.S. Black Politics: From Democratic Sacrifice to Democratic Repair,” Political Theory 44, no. 4 (Aug. 2016): 451, 454CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591716640314.

24 Shapiro, Ian, The State of Democratic Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003), 88Google Scholar.

25 Frederick Douglass, “The Destiny of Colored Americans,” The North Star, November 16, 1849, Library of Congress, Frederick Douglass Newspapers Collection, 1847 to 1874, https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn84026365/1849-11-16/ed-1/?sp=2.

26 Douglass, Frederick, “We Must Not Abandon the Observance of Decoration Day: An Address Delivered in Rochester, New York, on 30 May 1882,” in The Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One: Speeches, Debates, and Interviews, vol. 5, 1881–1895, ed. Blassingame, John W. and McKivigan, John R. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992), 45Google Scholar.

27 Douglass, Frederick, “The Work of the Future (Douglass’ Monthly, November 1862),” in Frederick Douglass: Selected Speeches and Writings, ed. Foner, Philip Sheldon and Taylor, Yuval (Chicago: Chicago Review Press, 1999), 521Google Scholar.

28 Ibid., 521–22.

29 Ibid., 522.

30 Ibid. (emphasis added).

31 Buccola, Nicholas, The Political Thought of Frederick Douglass: In Pursuit of American Liberty (New York: New York University Press, 2012), 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Douglass, “Work of the Future,” 522.

33 Best, Stephen and Hartman, Saidiya, “Fugitive Justice,” Representations 92, no. 1 (Fall 2005): 4–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2005.92.1.1.

34 Mills, Charles W., “White Time: The Chronic Injustice of Ideal Theory,” Du Bois Review 11, no. 1 (2014): 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X14000022.

35 Stanley, Sharon, “Alternative Temporalities: US Post-Racialism and Brazilian Racial Democracy,” Theory & Event 21, no. 3 (July 2018): 741Google Scholar.

36 Balfour, Lawrie, “Act and Fact: Slavery Reparations as a Democratic Politics of Reconciliation,” in The Politics of Reconciliation in Multicultural Societies, ed. Kymlicka, Will and Bashir, Bashir (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 110, 111Google Scholar.

37 Ibid., 111. See also Westley, Robert, “The Accursed Share: Genealogy, Temporality, and the Problem of Value in Black Reparations Discourse,” Representations 92, no. 1 (Fall 2005): 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2005.92.1.81.

38 Frederick Douglass, “Great Britain's Example Is High, Noble, and Grand: An Address Delivered in Rochester, New York, on 6 August 1885,” in Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One, 5:200–201. The final line of this passage quotes the concluding lines of John Greenleaf Whittier's 1847 poem “My Soul and I.” See Whittier, John Greenleaf, “My Soul and I,” in The Complete Writings of John Greenleaf Whittier, vol. 2 (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1892), 227Google Scholar.

39 Jason Frank, “Staging Dissensus: Frederick Douglass and ‘We the People,’” in Roberts, Political Companion to Frederick Douglass, 378.

40 Foner, Eric, The Second Founding: How the Civil War and Reconstruction Remade the Constitution (New York: Norton, 2019), 17Google Scholar.

41 See Sumner, Charles, “No Names of Victories over Fellow-Citizens on Regimental Colors: Resolution in the Senate, May 8, 1862,” in Charles Sumner: His Complete Works, vol. 8 (Boston: Lee and Shepard, 1900), 361–62Google Scholar; Thomas, Brook, The Literature of Reconstruction: Not in Plain Black and White (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017), 43Google Scholar; Douglass, “We Must Not Abandon the Observance of Decoration Day,” note 12.

42 Frederick Douglass, “Slavery,” The New National Era, March 20, 1873, Library of Congress, Frederick Douglass Newspapers Collection, 1847 to 1874, https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn84026753/1873-03-20/ed-1/seq-3/.

43 Douglass, “Observance of Decoration Day,” 44.

44 Myers, Peter C., Frederick Douglass: Race and the Rebirth of American Liberalism (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2008), 143–46Google Scholar.

45 The most plausible alternative to this result of an episodically constituted demos is a totally unbounded one: because it is difficult to specify a reasonable limiting principle even to the supposedly more restrictive all-coerced approach, both all-affected and all-coerced principles seem, as Sarah Song notes, “to push toward a global demos.” See Sarah Song, “The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory: Why the Demos Should Be Bounded by the State,” International Theory 4, no. 1 (March 2012): 53, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971911000248.

46 Abizadeh, Arash, “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders,” Political Theory 36, no. 1 (Feb. 2008): 47–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Song, “Boundary Problem,” 56. Abizadeh constructs his own arguments around coercion, not affectedness, in order to limit its scope, but the point about the demo's (principled) boundlessness and its (effectively) episodic and discontinuous quality applies in either case.

48 Ibid.

49 Fraser, Nancy, “Who Counts? Dilemmas of Justice in a Postwestphalian World,” Antipode 41, no. S1 (2009): 292Google Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00726.x.

50 Here, the question of immigration reappears, since high levels of migration also change the composition of the demos. Douglass explicitly addresses this issue in the 1869 “Composite Nationality” speech, maintaining that Chinese immigrants should be welcomed if they can be integrated into American political institutions: “Do you ask if I would favor such immigration? I answer, I would.” As I noted earlier, this speech illustrates Douglass's embrace of a multiracial (not merely biracial) view of American democracy. See Douglass, “Our Composite Nationality,” 251, 256.

51 Douglass, “Work of the Future,” 521–22.

52 Anderson, Elizabeth S., The Imperative of Integration (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Ibid., 184.

54 Douglass, “Work of the Future,” 522.

55 Anderson, Imperative of Integration, 188.

56 Shelby, Tommie, “Integration, Inequality, and Imperatives of Justice: A Review Essay,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 42, no. 3 (2014): 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12034.

57 Stanley, Sharon, An Impossible Dream? Racial Integration in the United States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 110CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Ibid., 112.

59 Ibid., 112, 115.

60 Ibid., 115–16.

61 Ibid., 115.

62 Frederick Douglass, “The Nation's Problem: An Address Delivered in Washington, D.C., on 16 April 1889,” in Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One, 5:415.

63 For an overview of the strains on Douglass's US nationalism in the 1850s, and an argument that scholars have exaggerated the strength of that nationalism, see Levine, Robert S., Dislocating Race and Nation: Episodes in Nineteenth-Century American Literary Nationalism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2008), chap. 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Frederick Douglass, “The Inaugural Address,” Douglass’ Monthly, April 1861, 433, Anacostia Community Museum Archives.

65 Ibid., 435.

66 Frederick Douglass, “A Trip to Hayti,” Douglass’ Monthly, May 1861, 449, Anacostia Community Museum Archives.

67 Ibid., 450.

68 Blight, David W., Frederick Douglass’ Civil War: Keeping Faith in Jubilee (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1991), 132Google Scholar.

69 For a related account of Douglass's brief foray into procolonization thought, see Hooker, “ ‘A Black Sister to Massachusetts,’ ” 692–93.

70 Blight, Frederick Douglass’ Civil War, 79.

71 Douglass, “Trip to Hayti,” 450.

72 Frederick Douglass, “Emancipation Proclaimed (Douglass’ Monthly, October 1862),” in Selected Speeches and Writings, 517–18.

73 Frederick Douglass, “Our Destiny Is Largely in Our Own Hands: An Address Delivered in Washington, D.C., on 16 April 1883,” in Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One, 5:68.

74 Blight, Frederick Douglass’ Civil War, 123.

75 Frederick Douglass, “A Nation in the Midst of a Nation: An Address Delivered in New York, New York on 11 May 1853,” in Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One, 2:438.

76 Frederick Douglass, “Lessons of the Hour: An Address Delivered in Washington, D.C., on 9 January 1894,” in Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One, 5:598.

77 Blight, Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom, 337.

78 Hooker, “ ‘A Black Sister to Massachusetts,’ ” 692.

79 Marasco, Robyn, The Highway of Despair: Critical Theory after Hegel (New York: Columbia University Press, 2015), 6Google Scholar.

80 Ibid., 3.

81 Ibid., 13.

82 Frederick Douglass, “Haiti and Faustin First,” The North Star, April 26, 1850, Library of Congress, Frederick Douglass Newspapers Collection, 1847 to 1874, https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn84026365/1850-04-26/ed-1/?sp=2&q=haiti&r=0.536,0.798,0.247,0.169,0.

83 Douglass, “Trip to Hayti,” 449.

84 Frederick Douglass, “Haiti and the Haitian People: An Address Delivered in Chicago, Illinois, on 2 January 1893,” in Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One, 5:510.

85 Hooker, “ ‘A Black Sister to Massachusetts,’ ” 692. In contrast, Hooker notes, “Black fugitive thought, for example, has generally been concerned with the creation of autonomous spaces for black freedom (such as maroon communities) at the margins of or outside colonial states and their successors” (ibid.).

86 If civil war had not arrived and democratic refounding in Haiti had, for whatever reason, proved impossible, Douglass—stuck between impossibility at home and impossibility abroad—might have been forced to explore a nonstatist strategy of the sort he otherwise abjured. Yet he seems not to have reached such a conclusion during his life. Into the 1890s, he continued to profess his belief in the possibility of multiracial democracy and the futility of separatism, declaring, a year before his death, that the colonization movement “tends to weaken [the African American's] hold on one country while it can give him no rational hope of another. . . . To have a home, the negro must have a country.” See Douglass, “Lessons of the Hour,” 598. Thanks to an anonymous referee for raising this point.

87 Douglass, “Work of the Future,” 521 (emphasis added).