* A recent grant-in-aid from the Social Science Research Council has greatly facilitated the author's research on this and other phases of Catholic social history.

¹ See the author's Urban Impact on American Protestantism, 1865–1900 (Cambridge, 1943)Google Scholar, for an elaboration of this view, esp. 21–26, 74–75, 81–87, 224–255.

² “Progress of Catholicism,” Metropolitan Catholic Almanac and Laity's Directory, 1850 (Baltimore, 1849), 233–234Google Scholar; Anon., “The Next Phase of Catholicity in the United States,” Catholic World, XXIII (08, 1876), 577–584Google Scholar; Maynard, Theodore, The Story of American Catholicism (New York, 1941), 182–219, 249 ff.Google Scholar; Goodykoontz, C. B., Home Missions on the American Frontier (Caldwell, Idaho, 1939), 115–164Google Scholar; Sweet, W. W., The American Churches: An Interpretation (New York, 1947), 34–50.Google Scholar

³ Dunigan's American Catholic Almanac (New York, 1860), 297–341Google Scholar; The American Christian Record (New York, 1860), 382Google Scholar; O'Gorman, Thomas, A History of the Catholic Church in the United States (New York, 1895), 496.Google Scholar

⁴ America: Political, Social and Religious (New York, 1855), 226.Google Scholar

⁵ Thomas T. McAvoy, C.S.C., is preoccupied with this phase of Catholic history in “The Formation of the Catholic Minority in the United States, 1820–1860,” Review of Politics, X (01, 1948), 13–34.Google Scholar

⁶ Billington, Ray Allen, The Protestant Crusade, 1800–1860 (New York, 1938), 3436, 133–135, 193–195, 409–412.Google Scholar

⁷ Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr., Orestes A. Brownson; a Pilgrim's Progress (Boston, 1939)Google Scholar; Maynard, Theodore, Orestes A. Brownson, Yankee, Radical, Catholic (New York, 1943)Google Scholar; Holden, Vincent F., C.S.P., The Early Years of Isaac Thomas Hecker (1819–1844), Washington, D. C., 1939Google Scholar; Elliott, Walter, C.S.P., The Life of Father Hecker (New York, 1891).Google Scholar

⁸ Questions of the Soul (New York, 1855)Google Scholar; Aspirations of Nature (New York, 1857)Google Scholar; and The Church and the Age (New York, 1887), esp. 64–114.Google Scholar

⁹ “Civil and Religious Toleration,” in Brownson, Henry F., editor, The Works of Orestes A. Brownson, X, 207–238Google Scholar; “The Church and the Republic,” ibid., XII, 20–32.

¹⁰ “Separation of Church and State,” ibid., 406–438; The American Republic (Detroit, 1895), 199–222.Google Scholar

¹¹ “Mission of America,” in Brownson, Henry F., editor, op. Cit., XI, 551–584Google Scholar; “The Church and Modern Civilization,” ibid., XII, 135–136.

¹² Brownson's Quarterly Review, New York Series, II (July, 1857), 349–351Google Scholar; ibid. (October, 1857), 485–486, 492–496.

¹³ Mannix, Edward J., The American Convert Movement (New York, 1923), 12, 107–110.Google Scholar

¹⁴ “Lecture on the Present Condition and Prospects of the Catholic Church in the United States” (1856)Google Scholar, in Kehoe, Lawrence, editor, Complete Works of the Most Rev. John Hughes, II, 129.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Ibid., 127.

¹⁶ Democracy in America (Phillips Bradley edition. New York, 1945), I, 300–302.Google Scholar

¹⁷ “Progress of Catholicism,” op. at., 235.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Op. cit., 127–128.

¹⁹ See Dorchester, Daniel, Problems of Religious Progress (rev. ed., New York, 1900), 584–592Google Scholar, for a long list of these estimates by Catholic authorities beginning with Bishop John England of Charleston who stated in 1837 that nearly four million Catholic immigrants had deserted the Church. For a more recent view that the Church has suffered only nominal defections, see Canevin, Bishop J. F. Regis, “The Rise and Progress of the Catholic Church in the United States,”Google Scholar Am. Fed. of Cath. Societies, Bulletin, VI (07, 1912), 1Google Scholar; same author, “Loss and Gain in the Catholic Church in the United States (110–1916), Cath. His. Rev., II (01, 1917), 377–385Google Scholar; and Shaughnessy, Bishop Gerald, Has the Immigrant Kept the Faith? (New York, 1925).Google Scholar

²⁰ Mitchell, Philip J., C.S.C., “A Study of Orestes A. Brownson's Views on the Know-Nothing Movement,” (Master's thesis, Univ. of Notre Dame, 1945), 31–36, 38–41, 48–54, 75–76, 79–20Google Scholar; “The Church and the Republic,” loc. cit., 3–4Google Scholar; “Catholic Schools and Education,” ibid., 510–511.

²¹ Rothan, Emmet H., O.F.M., The German Catholic Immigrant in the United States (1830–1860), Washington, D. C., 1946, pp. 108–122.Google Scholar

²² Steckel, Alfred, “The Roman Catholic Central Society of the United States of North America,” Records of the Amer. Cath. Hist. Society, VI (1895), 252–260.Google Scholar

²³ Matt, Joseph, Deutscher Romisch-Katholishcher Central-Verein (St. Louis, 1893), 20–46Google Scholar; Brophy, Mary Liguori, B.V.M., The Social Thought of the German Roman Catholic Central Verein (Washington, D. C., 1941), 1–14.Google Scholar

²⁴ Onahan, William J., “Irish Settlements in Illinois,” Catholic World, XXXIII (05, 1881), 157–162.Google Scholar

²⁵ February 23, 1856.

²⁶ “Address of the Catholic Convention to Promote Colonization in North America to the Friends of Catholic Settlements,” The Pilot, 03 1, 1856.Google Scholar

²⁷ Browne, Henry J., “Archbishop Hughes and Western Colonization,” Cath. Hist. Rev., XXXVI (10, 1950), 267, 274–275, 284–285.Google Scholar

²⁸ See, for example, Lord, Rev. John C. and O'Reilly, Rev. Bernard, Discussion Relative to the Buffalo Hospital of the Sisters of Charity (Buffalo, 1850).Google Scholar

²⁹ Lane, Francis E., American Charities and the Child of the Immigrant (Washington, D. C., 1932), 45–97.Google Scholar

³⁰ O'Grady, John, Catholic Charities in the United States: History and Problems (Washington, D. C., 1931), 108.Google Scholar

³¹ Metropolitan Catholic Almanac and Laity's Directory, 1846 (Baltimore, 1845), 124.Google Scholar

³² Ibid., 1856, p. 184; ibid., 1857, p. 153; ibid., 1861, pp. 110–111.

³³ Ibid., 1857, p. 235; ibid., 1861, pp. 57, 110–111.

³⁴ O'Grady, John, Levi Silliman Ives, Pioneer Leader in Catholic Charities (New York, 1933), 57–61.Google Scholar

³⁵ Metropolitan Catholic Almanac and Laity's Directory, 1849, pp. 165–166Google Scholar; Herron, Mary E., The Sisters of Mercy in the United States (New York, 1929), 11, 32–33, 45, 89–90, 92, 129, 132, 153–154, 179–181, 198–200.Google Scholar

³⁶ Metropolitan Catholic Almanac and Laity's Directory, 1857, p. 185Google Scholar; ibid., 1858, pp. 42, 157; ibid., 1861, p. 124; Dehey, Elinor Tong, Religious Orders of Women in the United States (rev. ed., Cleveland, 1930), 69–100.Google Scholar

³⁷ John O'Grady, Levi Silliman Ives, Pioneer Leader of Catholic Charities, 1–51, passim.

³⁸ The Protection of Destitute Catholic Children (New York, 1864), 18.Google Scholar

³⁹ Church and State Charities Compared (New York, 1857), 33–49, 53–68.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Lane, , op. cit., 120–124.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Locke, Jesse Albert, “Frederic Ozanam,” Charities Review, IX (04, 1899), 72–77.Google Scholar

⁴² James, L. T., “The Society in America,” St. Vincent de Paul Quarterly, II (05, 1897), 97.Google Scholar

⁴³ Report of the Superior Council of New York to the Council General of the Society of St. Vincent de Paul (New York, 1865), 42–43.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ O'Grady, , Levi Silliman Ives, Pioneer Leader of Catholic Charities, 64–65, 73–78Google Scholar; McColgan, Daniel T., A Century of Charity. The First Hundred Years of the Society of St. Vincent de Paul in the United States (Milwaukee, 1951), I, 233–257.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Zwierlein, Frederick J., The Life and Letters of Bishop McQuaid (Rochester, 1925–1927), I, 343–344Google Scholar; Metropolitan Catholic Almanac and Laity's Directory, 1859, p. 88.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Ibid., 1841, pp. 98, 112–113; ibid., 1842, p. 135; ibid., 1843, pp. 81, 119; ibid., 1844, pp. 86, 95; ibid., 1845, p. 97.

⁴⁷ “State of the Diocese of New York in 1841,” in Kehoe, , editor, op. cit., I, 438.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Bland, Sister Joan, Hibernian Crusade. The Story of the Catholic Total Abstinence Union of America (Washington, D. C., 1951), 21–42Google Scholar; Maguire, John Francis, Father Mathew: A Biography (New York, 1887), 488–489, 514, 517.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Brownson's Quarterly Review, New York Series, II (October, 1857), 495–496.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Elliott, , op. cit., 251–301, 332–347Google Scholar; Lugan, Alphonse, The Paulists: an American Community (New York, 1925)Google Scholar; Gillis, James M., The Paulists (New York, 1932).Google Scholar

⁵¹ Brownson's Quarterly Review, Third New York Series, I (04, 1860), 247–248.Google Scholar

⁵² McCabe, Lida Rose, “Progressive Methods of Church Work: a Roman Catholic Parish,” Christian Union, 01 7, 1893.Google Scholar

⁵³ “Our Roman Catholic Brethren,” Atlantic Monthly, XXI (05, 1868), 565.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Social reform was one fulfillment of the Paulist view “that practical religion consists in the sanctification of everyday life.” In a book long planned but never written, on “Perfect Life in Common Ways,” Hecker intended to show “that the ordinary duties of life are the high-roads to sanctity. There is no other way of perfection for the great mass of Christians than in the performance of the common duties of life with an eye to God.” Father Hecker to George Simpson, February 22, 1861, in Gasquet, Abbot, editor, “Some Letters of Father Hecker,” Catholic World, LXXXIII (06, 1906), 356–357.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Elliott, , op. cit., 327.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ “Religion in New York,” III (06, 1866), 381–389Google Scholar; “The Sanitary and Moral Condition of New York City,” VII (07–08, 1868), 553–566, 712–714Google Scholar; “The Charities of New York,” VIII (11, 1868), 279–285Google Scholar; “Who Shall Take Care of Our Sick?” VIII (10, 1868), 42–55Google Scholar; “Who Shall Take Care of the Poor?” VIII (02–03, 1869), 703–715, 734–740Google Scholar; “The Little Sisters of the Poor,” VIII (10, 1868), 110–116Google Scholar; “The Duties of the Rich in Christian Society,” XIV (02, March, 1872), 577–581, 753–757Google Scholar; ibid., XV (April, May, June, July, 1872), 37–41, 145–149, 289–294, 510–518; “The Homeless Poor of New York City,” XVI (11, 1872), 206–212.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Strong, William, “The Study of Social Science,” Journal of Social Science, No. 4, 1871, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Abell, , op. cit., 47.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Ibid., 11–15.

⁶⁰ Curtis, George William, “Speech before New York Constitutional Convention, 1867–1868,”Google Scholar quoted in The Catholic Publication Society Company, Grants of Land and Gifts of Money to Catholic and Non-Catholic Institutions (New York, 1879), 19.Google Scholar

⁶¹ “The Charities of New York,” loc. cit., 282.Google Scholar

⁶² “The Sanitary and Moral Condition of New York City,” VII (07, 1868), 554.Google Scholar

⁶³ “The Homes of the Poor,” May 10, 1873; “Topics of the Hour,” Catholic Review, 11 2, 1872.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Report of the Superior Council of New York, 1864–1865 (New York, 1866), 7–8.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Mode, Peter G., Source Book and Bibliographical Guide for American Church History (Menasha, Wis., 1921), 473–474Google Scholar; The Pilot, 07 12, 1873.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ “The Sanitary and Moral Condition of New York City,” VII (08, 1868), 713.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Quoted in Rowe, J. F., “Phases of Religion in the United States,” Christian Quarterly, I (04, 1869), 179–180.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ “The Charities of New York,” loc. cit., 282.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ “The Sanitary and Moral Condition of New York City,” loc. cit., VII (07, 1868), 561–563Google Scholar; “The Charities of New York,” loc. cit., 283.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ “A Word to the Independent,” ibid., XIII (May, 1871), 254.

⁷¹ Binsse, L. B., “The Catholic Charities of New York,” Catholic World, XLIII (08, 1886), 685Google Scholar; Stevenson, Edward Irenaeus, “Representative Roman Catholic Clergy,” The Independent, 12 30, 1886, p. 1694.Google Scholar

⁷² The Pilot, 01 13, 1900.Google Scholar

⁷³ “The Sanitary and Moral Condition of New York City,” loc. cit. (08, 1868), 714.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ “The Association for Befriending Children,” Catholic World, XI (05, 1870), 250–253Google Scholar; Ring, Thomas F., “Catholic Child Saving Agencies in the United States,” St. Vincent de Paul Quarterly, I (08, 1896), 276–277Google Scholar; “The Sisters of the Divine Compassion,” Amer. Eccles. Rev., XVIII (05, 1898), 484–501.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Delaney, John J., “What Catholic Agencies are Doing for the Reformation of Juvenile Delinquents,” Charities Review, VI (07–08, 1897), 443–444.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Herron, Mary E., op. cit., 118–119, 136, 139–140, 175, 185–186, 189Google Scholar; Sadlier's Catholic Directory, 1865, pp. 82, 160, 196, 206, 209Google Scholar; ibid, 1866, pp. 88, 109; ibid., 1867, p. 136; ibid., 1868, pp. 73, 91, 122; 1869, pp. 64, 238, 259; ibid., 1871, pp. 85, 121, 261; ibid., 1872, pp. 86, 97, 111, 155; ibid., 1874, p. 98; ibid., 1875, p. 116; ibid., 1877, p. 332; ibid., 1880, pp. 58, 153–154, 306, 400.

⁷⁷ Ibid., 1867, pp. 98, 187; ibid., 1872, p. 87; ibid., 1874, pp. 92, 139, 303; ibid., 1878, p. 216; ibid., 1880, pp. 142, 214; Dehey, Elinor Tony, op. cit., 311, 444, 547.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Catholic Review, 11 11, 1874Google Scholar; McKelvey, Blake, Rochester: The Flower City, 1855–1890 (Cambridge, 1949), 146, 278, 370.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Sadlier's Catholic Directory, 1865, p. 113Google Scholar; ibid., 1867, pp. 79, 136, 165, 185; ibid., 1873, 323; ibid., 1880, p. 306; Dehey, , op. cit., 283.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ MrsBouvier, J. V., “New York Foundling Hospital,” St. Vincent de Paul Quarterly, I (05, 1896), 163–169Google Scholar; Ring, , op. cit., 265–266Google Scholar; S. C., “Sister Irene, Founder of the New York Foundling Hospital,” Charities Review, IX (09, 1899), 297–301Google Scholar; Lane, , op. cit., 129–131Google Scholar; O'Grady, , Catholic Charities in the United States, 132–139.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Dougherty, James E., “John Christopher Drumgoole, Founder of the Mission of the Immaculate Virgin for Homeless and Destitute Children,” Charities Review, VIII (08, 1898), 323–327.Google Scholar

⁸² Quoted in Clarke, R. H., “Catholic Protectories and Reformatories,” Am. Cath. Quart. Rev., XX (07, 1895), 615.Google Scholar

⁸³ Church, Thomas, “Father Drumgoole's Work—the Origin and Growth of the St. Joseph's Union,” Donahoe's Magazine, II (11, 1879), 427–433.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ “Rome in New York,” in Committee on Catholic Interests of the Catholic Club of the City of New York, compiler, Catholic Charities and the Constitutional Convention of 1894 of the State of New York (New York, 1894), 3–5.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Lane, , op. cit., 124–126Google Scholar; The Pilot, 11 5, 1870Google Scholar; ibid., April 19, 1873; ibid., May 3, 1873; ibid., September 29, 1883.

⁸⁶ Sadlier's Catholic Directory, 1865, p. 168Google Scholar; ibid., 1866, p. 184.

⁸⁷ Spalding, John Lancaster, The Life of the Most Reverend M. J. Spalding, Archbishop of Baltimore (Baltimore, 1873), 288–294, 374Google Scholar; Ring, , op. cit., 270.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ “Save the Boys,” Donahoe's Magazine, VIII (12, 1882), 540–543.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Report, 1895, quoted in Ring, , op. cit., 273–274.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Catholic Review, 03 17, 1877.Google Scholar

⁹¹ The Pilot, 06 21, 1873Google Scholar; August 9, 1873; October 11, 1873; January 10, 1874; April 4, 1874; November 7, 1874; December 12, 1874; September 18, 1875.

⁹² Sadlier's Catholic Directory, 1885, pp. 345, passim.Google Scholar

⁹³ Op. cit., 610, 612.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ For the beginnings of union among French and Polish Catholic benevolent societies, see The Pilot, 03 21, 1874Google Scholar, and New York Freeman's Journal and Catholic Register, 12 26, 1874.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Steckel, , op. cit., 260–261Google Scholar; The Pilot, 03 6, 1875.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ “Sketch and History of the Irish Catholic Benevolent Union of the United States and Canada,” Twenty Fourth Annual Convention, Proceedings, 1892, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ “Irish Catholic Benevolent Union,” The Pilot, 07 26, 1872.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Quoted in The Pilot, 10 25, 1873.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ The amended resolution read, “That the system of State education now established in most States by its failure to provide proper religious instruction for the young, and its enlightening the head to the entire neglect of heart-culture, meets with our unqualified reprobation; that it unjustly taxes a large class of our people, who cannot without danger to the faith and morality of their offspring, avail themselves of its advantages.” ibid. Even this statement was too extreme for Mayor Keily who believed that “the public school system which generally prevails in the United States, in which sound and exclusively secular education is imparted, without assailing or defending any religious tenets, is, under the conditions generally prevailing in the United States, a wise and beneficent system.” He added, however, that “whenever the zeal or piety or opportunity of the Church succeeds in erecting by the side of the public school a Catholic school of equal or approximate advantages, and the added grace of a moral training, let us avail ourselves of it, and thank God for the privilege.” Letter to editor of The Pilot, 01 31, 1874.Google Scholar Somewhat heatedly Keily explained that his views did not conflict with Article 48 of the Syllabus of Errors, as charged by The Pilot and other commentators. The Pilot was satisfied with his explanation. “The Syllabus and Mayor Keily's position on the Public School Question,” 03 7, 1874.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ The Pilot, 10 31, 1874Google Scholar; ibid., October 30, 1875.

¹⁰¹ New York Freeman's Journal, 11 21, 1874Google Scholar; Catholic Review, 08 26, 1876.Google Scholar

¹⁰² “Sketch and History of the Irish Catholic Benevolent Union …,” loc. cit.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Ibid.

¹⁰⁴ Matt, Joseph, op. cit., 15–20.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ The Pilot, 10 25, 1873Google Scholar; Irish Catholic Benevolent Union, Proceedings, 1875, pp. 30, appendix.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ “Committee on Immigration,” ibid., 19–20.

¹⁰⁷ Brophy, , op. cit., 36–37, 87–89.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Meehan, Thomas F., “Emigrant Aid Societies,” Catholic Encyclopedia, V. 403Google Scholar; Schaefer, Joseph and Herbermann, Charles G., “The Society of St. Raphael and the Leo House,” United States Catholic Historical Society, Historical Records and Studies, I (01, 1899), 110–117.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Sweeney, Helen M., “Handling the Immigrant,” Catholic World, LXIII (07, 1896), 503Google Scholar; Abell, , op. cit., 41.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Schaefer, and Herbermann, , op. cit., 110–129Google Scholar; O'Reilly, I. M., “The Leo House for Immigrants, A Departure in Organized Catholic Charity,” Records of the Am. Cath. Hist. Society, XVI (1905), 445–452.Google Scholar

¹¹¹ Byrne, Patrick, “Utility of Our Societies,” in O'Brien, James W., editor, Lectures and Addresses of the Very Rev. Thos. N. Burke, O.P…. (New York, 1872), 68Google Scholar; O'Brien, James W., “The Catholic Total Abstinence Union of Aemrica,” in W. H. Daniels, The Temperance Movement and Its Great Reformers (New York, 1878), 207–211.Google Scholar

¹¹² “Intemperance—How to Check its Ravages,” O'Brien, , editor, op. cit., 45–48.Google Scholar

¹¹³ O'Brien, James W., “The Catholic Total Abstinence Union of America,” in National Temperance Society and Publication House, The Centennial Temperance Volume. A Memorial of the International Temperance Conference, Philadelphia, June, 1876 (New York, 1881), 726.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ For a detailed discussion of the C.T.A.U. of A., see Sister Bland, Joan, op. cit., 43 ffGoogle Scholar; and Green, James J., “The Organization of the Catholic Total Abstinence Union of America, 1866–1884,” Records of the American Catholic Historical Society of Philadelphia, LXI (06, 1950), 71–97.Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Gibbs, Joseph C., History of the Catholic Total Abstinence Union of America (Philadelphia, 1907), 20Google Scholar. But the Union was not opposed in principle to prohibitory legislation, recognizing in Resolution 7 “the great good that would result from the suppression of public drinking places, and from such legislation as would restrain the manufacture of intoxicating liquor within bounds consistent with public morality, and will gladly hail such legislation whenever the public authorities may grant it.” “Baltimore Resolutions,” in O'Brien, , editor, op. cit., 52Google Scholar. In the meantime, the Union informed the Prohibition party, it would steer clear of political movements “looking only to the supply” and “rely upon the power of religion to destroy the demand by conquering the appetite.” Ibid.

¹¹⁶ Ibid.

¹¹⁷ Abell, , op. cit., 47–50.Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ “The Catholic Total Abstinence Union of America,” The Centennial Temperance Volume …, 732–733.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Quoted in The Pilot, 11 8, 1873Google Scholar; see also Harrison, J. B., Certain Dangerous Tendencies in American Life and Other Papers (Boston, 1880), 190–191.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ The Pilot, 05 23, 1874.Google Scholar

¹²¹ The Catholic Total Abstinence Union of America, Constitution and Proceedings, 1875, p. 24.Google Scholar

¹²² The Pilot, 03 20, 1875.Google Scholar

¹²³ Quoted in The Pilot, 10 4, 1873.Google Scholar

¹²⁴ “A Serious Word with our Temperance Societies,” 10 24, 1874.Google Scholar

¹²⁵ Quoted in The Pilot, 10 31, 1874.Google Scholar

¹²⁶ C. T. A. U. of A., Constitution and Proceedings, 1873, pp. 45–48.Google Scholar

¹²⁷ The Pilot, 10 18, 1873.Google Scholar

¹²⁸ Ibid., November 7, 1874; ibid., February 20, 1875.

¹²⁹ Calkins, Raymond, Substitutes for the Saloon (Boston, 1901), 377.Google Scholar

¹³⁰ “Catholic National Unity” (ed.), McGee's Illustrated Weekly, II (06 16, 1877), 50.Google Scholar

¹³¹ “Catholic Young Men's Associations,” Catholic World, XVIII (11 1873), 273–274Google Scholar; Cleveland Papers (Library of Congress), February 12, 1897.

¹³² “The Assumption Literary Society,” Catholic Review, 06 20, 1874Google Scholar; ibid., July 25, 1874.

¹³³ The Working Church, II (08, 1874), 117.Google Scholar

¹³⁴ Flanagan, Daniel, “A Question for Irish Societies,” The Pilot, 03 6, 1875.Google Scholar

¹³⁵ “Catholic Young Men's Associations,” op. cit., 269–276.Google Scholar

¹³⁶ The Pilot, 03 6, 1875Google Scholar; ibid., September 30, 1899; Slattery, Michael J., “Fraternal Societies of the Laity,” Catholic Builders of the Nation, II, 319–320.Google Scholar

¹³⁷ “Our Catholic Young Men,” Catholic Review, 09 6, 1879Google Scholar; “Catholic Young Men's National Union,” ibid., November 8, 1879.

¹³⁸ White, James Addison, The Founding of Cliff Haven. Early Years of the Catholic Summer School of America (New York, 1950), 5–6, 17–18, 59–60.Google Scholar

¹³⁹ Some societies, particularly those affiliated with the Young Men's Institute, founded in California in 1883, provided sickness and death benefits. “The Young Men's Institute,” Catholic Encyclopedia, XIV, 736.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁰ Slattery, , op. cit.Google Scholar

¹⁴¹ “Joint Address of the State Catholic Total Abstinence Unions,” in O'Brien, James W., editor, op. cit., 51.Google Scholar

¹⁴² The Pilot, 10 31, 1874.Google Scholar

¹⁴³ But the Louisville, Catholic Advocate, 10 29, 1874Google Scholar, commended Bayley's “words of wisdom to the careful perusal and serious consideration of members of Catholic societies, and especially to those who are identified with organizations which, in a spirit of recklessness that chafes under wholesome religious restraint, are disposed to array themselves in opposition to the moral precepts of the Church.”

¹⁴⁴ See Rt. Rev. Becker, Thomas A., “Secret Societies in the United States,” Am. Cath. Quart. Rev., III (04, 1878), 193–219Google Scholar, which is cautiously favorable to trade unions; and Shea, John Gilmary, “The Rapid Increase of the Dangerous Classes in the United States,”Google Scholaribid., IV (April, 1879), 255, 263, 265, 266, and Rt. Rev. Chatard, Francis S., “Catholic Societies,”Google Scholaribid., 215–217, 219–221, which are implicitly opposed.

¹⁴⁵ March 15, 1873; April 12, 1873; May 10, 1873; May 31, 1873; May 29, 1875; June 19, 1875.

¹⁴⁶ Abell, , op. cit., 21–23.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁷ “View of the Labor Movement,” X (03, 1870), 784–789.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁸ Ibid., 784, 789.

¹⁴⁹ Ibid., 792–795.

¹⁵⁰ Anon., “Who Shall Take Care of Our Poor?,” Catholic World, VIII (03, 1869), 734–740.Google Scholar

¹⁵¹ Catholic Review, 07 22, 1876Google Scholar; “Open Catholic Agricultural Homes in the West,” ibid., January 4, 1879; Sadlier's Catholic Directory, 1880, p. 400.Google Scholar

¹⁵² The Pilot, 05 2, 1874Google Scholar; December 8, 1898.

¹⁵³ “Colonization and Future Emigration,” Catholic World, XXV (08, 1877), 685–688Google Scholar; “Catholic Colonization as Actually Established,” ibid., XXIX (April, 1879), 120–126; “Roman Catholic Colonization,” Christian Union, 03 26, 1879Google Scholar; Witte, Raymond Philip, S.M., Twenty-five Years of Crusading. A History of the National Catholic Rural Life Conference (Des Moines, 1948), 25–27.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁴ I. C. B. U, Proceedings of Convention, 1875, p. 20Google Scholar; ibid., 1876, pp. 11–12.

¹⁵⁵ Ibid., 13–16.

¹⁵⁶ Sister Henthorne, Mary Evangela, The Career of the Right Reverend John Lancaster Spalding, Bishop of Peoria, as President of the Irish Catholic Colonization Association of the United States, 1879–1892 (Urbana, 1932), 35–59Google Scholar; for Spalding's Catholic humanism, see McAvoy, Thomas T., C.S.C., “Bishop Lancaster Spalding and the Catholic Minority (1877–1908,)” Review of Politics, XII (01, 1950), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁵⁷ Spalding, , The Religious Mission of the Irish Race, pp. 118, 121, 205.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁸ Henthorne, , op. cit., 61–89Google Scholar; The Pilot, 04 3, 1880.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁹ “Secretary's First Annual Report,” Catholic Review, 05 29, 1880Google Scholar; Byrne, Stephen, O.P., “Irish Settlers in the West,” The Pilot, 02 3, 1883.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁰ Riordan, John J., “The Priest at Castle Garden,” Catholic World, XLII (01, 1886), 563–568Google Scholar; Sweeney, Helen M., “Handling the Immigrant,”Google Scholaribid., LXIII (July, 1896), 505–507; “A Shelter and a Home,” Catholic Review, 10 24, 1896.Google Scholar

¹⁶¹ Report of the Superior Council of New York to the Council-General at Paris, 1886 (New York, 1887), 16–17.Google Scholar