Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T21:34:23.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Three Generations of Radicals Enough? Self-Critique in the Novels of Tess Slesinger, Mary McCarthy and Marge Piercy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Philip Abbott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three novels by Tess Slesinger, Mary McCarthy and Marge Piercy respectively can inform us about American radical movements and perhaps radicalism in general. Each work is a radical self-critique written by political participants who assess their generation's radical experiment and its failure. I argue that there are two sets of arguments common to each critique, one related to the failure of radical imagination and one feminist, and that there is a “submerged” third critique that can be drawn from each narrative. It is from the later submerged critique that we can learn the most about the successive failures of American radicalism.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , Fall 1991 , pp. 602 - 626
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For autobiographical and biographical analyses, see: for Slesinger, , Biagi, Shirley, “Forgive Me for Dying,” Antioch Review 35 (Spring-Summer 1977): 224–36Google Scholar; Janet Sharistanian “Afterward,” Slesinger, , The Unpossessed (New York: Feminist Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Wald, Alan, “The Menorah Group Moves Left,” Jewish Social Studies 38 (Summer-Fall 1976): 289–320Google Scholar; for McCarthy, McCarthy, , On the Contrary (New York: Farrar, Straus, 1962)Google Scholar; Gelderman, Carol, Mary McCarthy: A Life (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988)Google Scholar; for Piercy, , Betsky, Celia “A Talk with Marge Piercy,” New York Times Book Review, 24 02 1980, pp. 36–38Google Scholar; Piercy, , Parti-colored Blocks for a Quilt (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1982)Google Scholar; Gitlin, Todd, The Sixties (New York: Bantam, 1987), pp. 371–73.Google Scholar

2. Slesinger, Tess, The Unpossessed (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1934), p. 34.Google Scholar

3. McCarthy, Mary, The Oasis (New York: Random House, 1949), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar

4. Piercy, Marge, Vida (New York: Summit books, 1979), pp. 110.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., pp. 411–12.

6. While loosely related to recent literary theorization which seeks to discover submerged analyses in texts, the following textual analysis is primarily a “reconstructive” effort in that it seeks to append narratives to those expressly stated.

7. Slesinger, , The Unpossessed, pp. 33–34.Google Scholar

8. Ibid., p. 31.

9. Ibid., p. 29.

10. Ibid., p. 31.

11. Ibid., pp. 326–30.

12. Ibid., pp. 40–41.

13. Ibid., p. 53.

14. Ibid., p. 61.

15. Ibid., p. 231.

16. McCarthy, , The Oasis, p. 35.Google Scholar

17. Ibid., p. 89.

18. Ibid., pp. 19, 21–22.

19. Ibid., p.88.

20. See Gelderman, , Mary McCarthy: A Life, pp. 142–48.Google Scholar Also see general assessments: Graebner, William S., The Age of Doubt: American Thought and Culture in the 1940s (Boston: Twayne, 1991)Google Scholar; Boyer, Paul, By Dawn's Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age (New York: Pantheon, 1985).Google Scholar

21. Ibid., pp. 32–33.

22. Ibid., p. 109.

23. Ibid., p. 178.

24. Piercy, Marge, Vida, p. 312.Google Scholar

25. Ibid., p. 311.

26. Ibid., p. 310–11.

27. Piercy, Marge, “The Grand Coolie Damn” in Morgan, Robin, ed., Sisterhood Is Powerful (New York: Vintage, 1970), p. 430.Google Scholar

28. Slesinger, , The Unpossessed, p. 97.Google Scholar

29. Ibid., p. 350.

30. Piercy, , Parti-colored Blocks for a Quilt, p. 177.Google Scholar

31. Rahv, Philip, (book review), New Masses 11 (1934): 26–27.Google Scholar

32. Wald, Allan M., The New York Intellectuals (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1985), p. 40.Google Scholar

33. Pell, Richard H., Radical Visions and American Dreams (Middletown, CN: Wesleyan University Press, 1973), p. 404.Google Scholar

34. Barr, Donald (book review), New York Times, 14 08 1940.Google Scholar Also see: Gottried, Alex and Davidson, Sue, “Utopia's Children: an Interpretation of Three Political Novels,” Western Political Quarterly 15 (03, 1962): 17–32.Google Scholar

35. Hook, Sidney, Out of Step (New York: Harper and Row, 1987), p. 524.Google Scholar

36. Langer, Elinor, “After the Movement,” New York Times Book Review, 24 02 1980.Google Scholar

37. Leonard, John, (book review), New York Times, 15 01 1980.Google Scholar

38. Howe, Irving, Politics and the Novel (New York: Meridian, 1957), p. 163.Google Scholar

39. On the concept of invented communities, see: Nisbet, Robert, The Twilight of Authority (New York: Oxford University Press, 1975)Google Scholar and Abbott, Philip, Seeking New Inventions (Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1987).Google Scholar

40. Emerson, Ralph Waldo, “New England Reformers” (1844) in Cook, Reginald L., ed., Selected Prose and Poetry (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1950), pp. 145, 147.Google Scholar

41. Ibid., p. 147.

42. Writing in another generation, Addams, Jane, early in her career, contended that a “fast growing number of cultivated people” were so infected with a sense of loneliness that they were being “buried beneath mental accumulation.” Thus “subjective necessity” required devotion to public problems. Philanthropy and Social Progress (New York: Crowell, 1893), p. 20.Google Scholar

43. Mansbridge, Jane J. describes this structure expertly in her Beyond Adversary Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980)Google Scholar. Also see Holsworth's, Robert D. summary of “personalist politics” in Let Your Live Speak (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989), pp. 179–200.Google Scholar

44. Goffman, Erving, Relations in Public (New York: Harper and Row, 1971), p. 7.Google Scholar

45. Slesinger, , The Unpossessed, p. 39.Google Scholar

46. See the comments of collective members in Annie Popkin's account of early feminist radical organization. For example: “My whole lifestyle was completely determined by the movement…. Bread and Roses became the newer form and it was better for me.” “An Early Moment in Women's Liberation,” Radical America 22 (1989): 19–35.Google Scholar See Todd Gitlin on the centifrugal impact of feminism on the radical project of the sixties (The Sixties, pp. 375–76).

47. For a helpful review of problems in recent social movement theory, see Boggs, Carl, Social Movements and Political Power (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986), chap. 1.Google Scholar

48. Slesinger had recently become estranged from the independent radicalism of the Menorah group led by her former spouse, Herbert Solow. See: Wald, Alan M., The New York Intellectuals, pp. 64–74.Google Scholar

49. Sussman, Warren, Culture as History (New York: Pantheon, 1984), p. 173.Google Scholar

50. Klehr, Harvey, The Heyday of American Communism(New York: Basic Books, 1984), p. 367.Google Scholar

51. Gottdiener, Mark, The Social Production of Urban Space (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1985), pp. 284–86.Google Scholar

52. Lefebvre, Henri, “Space: Social Product and Use Value” in Critical Sociology, ed. Frieberg, J. W. (New York: Irvington, 1979), p. 292Google Scholar; Bellah, Robert, Habits of the Heart (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), pp. 71–75.Google Scholar