Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T11:35:25.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is ideal theory practical?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2011

RAHUL SAGAR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines how the exemplars of ideal theory have addressed what I term ‘the problem of preservation’. The ‘problem’ in question is not so much that a political community must make provisions for its self-preservation, but rather that its provisions must correspond to the intentions and capabilities of its neighbours. This constraint implies that the ability of a political community to pursue ideals rather than power depends heavily on who its neighbours happen to be. This article shows how Aristotle, Rousseau, Kant, and Rawls address this problem by recommending measures such as defensive fortification, collective security, and democratic peace, which, they claim, will dampen the anarchic nature of the international system. It argues that the implausibility of these measures renders the ability of political communities to heed the moral guidance offered by ideal theory contingent at best and impractical at worst. If proponents of ideal theory wish to resist this conclusion, then they must offer a more persuasive answer to the problem of preservation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 1949 - 1965
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On this see Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979)Google Scholar ; Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Knopf, 1948)Google Scholar ; Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton, 2001)Google Scholar .

2 Hassner, Pierre, ‘Beyond the Three Traditions: The Philosophy of War and Peace in Historical Perspective’, International Affairs, 70:4 (1994), p. 743CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

3 This is the subject matter of what contemporary Rawlsians refer to as ‘non-ideal’ theory. As John Simmons has put it, ‘where ideal theory dictates the objective, non-ideal theory dictates the route to that objective.’ On this, see Simmons, A. John, ‘Ideal and Nonideal Theory’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 38:1 (2010), p. 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

4 Aristotle, , The Politics, and the Constitution of Athens, ed. Everson, Stephen (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 1267a17–28Google Scholar .

5 Aristotle, , Politics, 1270a30Google Scholar . The reference here is to the historic battle at Leuctra in 371 BC where the Spartans were defeated by the Thebans, an event that marked the beginning of their decline in Greek politics.

6 Aristotle, , Politics, 1265a20–25Google Scholar . Plato, , The Laws trans. Pangle, Thomas L. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980), p. 704Google Scholar .

7 Aristotle, , Politics, 1265a25–27Google Scholar .

8 Ibid., 1325a13–15.

9 Ibid., 1327a37–1327b5.

10 Ibid., 1330b33–35.

11 Ibid., 1330b37–1331a4.

12 Ibid., 1331a13–18.

13 Ibid., 1324b5.

14 Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Crisp, Roger (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 1145aCrossRefGoogle Scholar .

15 Aristotle, , Politics, 1324b40–1325a5Google Scholar . At 1333b40, Aristotle asserts men should study war to ‘provide against their own enslavement’ and to ‘obtain empire for the good of the governed.’

16 Ibid., 1324b7–10, 1271b1.

17 Ibid., 1267a17–28.

18 Ibid., 1267a30–33.

19 Ibid., 1267a32–36.

20 Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics, 1179b.Google Scholar

21 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, ‘the State of War’, in The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, trans. Gourevitch, Victor (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 163Google Scholar .

22 Ibid., p. 163.

23 Ibid., p. 165.

24 Ibid., p. 167.

25 Ibid., p. 169.

26 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, The Social Contract, ed. Cranston, Maurice (New York: Penguin Books, 1993), p. 95Google Scholar , emphasis added.

27 Ibid., p. 92.

28 Ibid.

29 Ibid., p. 138.

30 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, ‘Constitutional Project for Corsica’, in Hoffmann, Stanley and Fidler, David P. (eds), Rousseau on International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 141Google Scholar .

31 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, ‘Considerations on the Government of Poland’, in Hoffmann, and Fidler, (eds), Rousseau on International Relations, p. 168Google Scholar .

32 Ibid., p. 183.

33 Rousseau says to the Corsicans that ‘it is not so much a question of becoming different as of knowing how to stay who you are.’ (Rousseau, ‘Constitutional Project’, p. 142). Also see Hoffmann, Stanley, ‘Rousseau on War and Peace’, American Political Science Review, 57:2 (1963), pp. 328–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

34 Hoffmann, ‘Rousseau on War and Peace’, pp. 330–1.

35 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, ‘Criticism of St. Pierre's Project’, in A Lasting Peace Through the Federation of Europe, trans. Vaughan, C. E. (New York: Herman and Stephens, 1955), p. 96Google Scholar . More generally see Riley, Patrick, ‘Rousseau as a Theorist of National and International Federalism’, Publius, 3:1 (1973), pp. 11–16Google Scholar .

36 Ibid., p. 96.

37 Ibid., pp. 111–12.

38 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, trans. Gourevitch, Victor (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 116Google Scholar .

39 For a recent critique of the idea of collective security see Mearshimer, John J., ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, 19:3 (1994)Google Scholar ; and for a rebuttal see Kupchan, Charles A. and Kupchan, Clifford A., ‘The Promise of Collective Security’, International Security, 21:1 (1995)Google Scholar . For a broad survey see Downs, George, ed., Collective Security Beyond the Cold War (Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

40 Rousseau, , Social Contract, p. 143Google Scholar .

41 Ibid., p. 47. More generally see Hassner, ‘Beyond the Three Traditions’, pp. 740–2.

42 Kant, Immanuel, ‘Idea for a Universal History From a Cosmopolitan Point of View’, in Political Writings, ed. Reiss, H. S., trans. Nisbet, H. B. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 49Google Scholar .

43 Ibid., p. 47.

44 Kant, Immanuel, ‘On the Common Saying: This May be True in Theory but it does not Apply in Practice’, in Political Writings, p. 92Google Scholar .

45 Hume, David, ‘Of Commerce’ in Political Essays, ed. Haakonssen, Knud (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 100CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

46 Kant, Immanuel, ‘the Contest of Faculties’, in Political Writings, p. 188Google Scholar .

47 Ibid., p. 189.

48 Kant, ‘Idea for a Universal History’, p. 48.

49 Hume, David, ‘Of Civil Liberty’, in Political Essays, p. 55Google Scholar .

50 Kant, ‘Idea for a Universal History’, pp. 50–1; ‘On the Common Saying’, pp. 90–1; Kant, Immanuel, ‘Perpetual Peace’, in Political Writings, p. 114Google Scholar .

51 Kant, ‘Idea for a Universal History’, pp. 47–9; Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 90Google Scholar . Hobbes denies that interstate relations are likely to prove intolerable and does not make the assumption that sovereign states would be incapable of outright military victory over rivals.

52 Kant, ‘the Contest of Faculties’, pp. 189–90. Contrast with Hume, David, ‘Of Public Credit’, in Political Essays, pp. 172–177Google Scholar .

53 Kant, ‘Perpetual Peace’, p. 111. Or as he states in another essay, enlightenment is ‘a great benefit which the human race must reap even from its rulers self-seeking schemes of expansion’ (Kant, ‘Idea for a Universal History’, p. 51). For a more recent variation on this approach see Wendt, Alexander, ‘Why a World State is Inevitable: Teleology and the Logic of Anarchy’, European Journal of International Relations, 9:4 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

54 For an account that emphasises Kant's solution as an open moral challenge for mankind rather than a causal mechanism prone to falsification see Williams, Michael C., ‘Reason and Realpolitik: Kant's ‘Critique of International Politics’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 25:1 (1992), pp. 117–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Also see MacMillan, John, ‘A Kantian Protest Against the Peculiar Discourse of Inter-Liberal State Peace’, Millennium, 24:3 (1994)Google Scholar ; and Cavallar, Georg, ‘Kantian Perspectives on Democratic Peace: Alternatives to Doyle’, Review of International Studies, 27:2 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar . More generally see Hurrell, Andrew, ‘Kant and the Kantian Paradigm in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 16:3 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

55 Hobbes, , Leviathan, p. 90Google Scholar . However, also see Kleingeld, Pauline, ‘Approaching Perpetual Peace: Kant's Defense of a League of States and his Ideal of a World Federation’, European Journal of Philosophy, 12:3 (2004), pp. 314–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

56 Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 7Google Scholar .

57 Rawls, , Theory of Justice, p. 7Google Scholar , emphasis added.

58 Ibid., p. 8.

59 Aristotle, , Politics, 1324b40–1325a5Google Scholar .

60 Rawls, , Theory of Justice, p. 333Google Scholar . Also see Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar . Rawls elaborates his account of the principles of international right in The Law of Peoples. These principles are intended to inform the conduct of a just society vis-à-vis other societies. The Law of Peoples does not however shed significant new light on the question of how a just society can continue to operate reasonably – both within and without – when it encounters unjust aggression.

61 Ibid., p. 334.

62 Ibid., p. 333–4.

63 Ibid., p. 334, emphasis added.

64 Rawls, , Law of Peoples, pp. 44–54Google Scholar ; Doyle, Michael W., ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12:3 (1983)Google Scholar .

65 For example, see Layne, Christopher, ‘Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace’, International Security, 19:2 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Gowa, Joanne, Ballots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic Peace (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar ; Rosato, Sebastian, ‘The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory’, American Political Science Review, 97:4 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

66 Buchan, Bruce, ‘Explaining War and Peace: Kant and Liberal IR Theory’, Alternatives, 27 (2002), pp. 419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

67 Wenar, Leif and Milanovic, Branko, ‘Are Liberal Peoples Peaceful?’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 17:4 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

68 For example see, Simmons, ‘Ideal and Nonideal Theory’, pp. 31–4; Stemplowska, Zofia, ‘What's Ideal About Ideal Theory’, Social Theory and Practice, 34:3 (2008), pp. 331–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Swift, Adam, ‘The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances’, Social Theory and Practice, 34:3 (2008), p. 364CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

69 Stemplowska, ‘What's Ideal About Ideal Theory’, p. 332.

70 Simmons, ‘Ideal and Nonideal Theory’, p. 34.