Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:43:12.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Including the excluded: communitarian paths to cosmopolitanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

EDUARD JORDAAN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cosmopolitanism is frequently criticised for overlooking the situatedness of morality and the importance of solidarity in their aspiration to global justice. A number of thinkers take these criticisms seriously and pursue ‘a communitarian path to cosmopolitanism’. Four such approaches are considered. All four view morality and justice as grounded in a specific social setting and hold that justice is more likely to result if there is some ‘we-feeling’ among people, but are simultaneously committed to expanding the realm of justice and moral concern to beyond national boundaries. To enable the theorisation of an expanded realm of situated justice and moral concern, community is conceived as not necessarily corresponding to political boundaries and the moral the self is seen as able and eager to loosen some of its traditional moral connections and to form new ones. Unfortunately, these approaches are likely to exclude significant segments of the world's population from the expanded realm of moral concern they theorise, most notably, a large proportion of the world's poor. It is suggested that the thought of Emmanuel Levinas might offer a way of reducing the gap between solidarity and moral universalism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , December 2011 , pp. 2365 - 2385
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pogge, Thomas, World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002), p. 169Google Scholar .

2 Kymlicka, Will, Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

3 Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar .

4 Rawls, John, Collected Papers (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 390Google Scholar .

5 Kymlicka, Politics in the Vernacular; Miller, David, ‘Cosmopolitanism: A Critique’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 5 (2003), pp. 80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; and Walzer, Michael, Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1994)Google Scholar .

6 Shapcott, Richard, Justice, Community and Dialogue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 31Google Scholar .

7 Pogge, , World Poverty, pp. 1–32Google Scholar .

8 Ikenberry, G. John, ‘The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive?’, Foreign Affairs, 87 (2008), pp. 23–37Google Scholar .

9 Bhabha, Homi, ‘The Vernacular Cosmopolitan’, in Dennis, Ferdinand and Khan, Naseem (eds), Voices of the Crossing: The Impact of Britain on Writers from Asia, the Caribbean and Africa (London: Serpent's Tail, 2000), pp. 133–142Google Scholar ; ‘Unsatisfied: Notes on Vernacular Cosmopolitanism’, in Castle, Gregory (ed.), Postcolonial Discourses: An Anthology (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), pp. 38–52Google Scholar ; and The Location of Culture (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. ix–xxv; Anthony Appiah, Kwame, ‘Cosmopolitan Patriots’, in Cohen, Joshua (ed.), For Love of Country (Boston: Beacon Press, 1996), pp. 21–29Google Scholar ; The Ethics of Identity (Princeton; Princeton University Press, 2005), pp. 213–72; Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers (New York: W. W. Norton, 2006).

10 Rorty, Richard, Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 195Google Scholar .

11 Rorty, Richard, Philosophy as Cultural Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

12 Rorty, Richard, Contingency, Irony, Solidarity (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 1989), p. 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

13 Rorty, , Philosophy as Cultural Politics, p. 45Google Scholar .

14 Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and Social Hope (London: Penguin, 1999), p. xiiGoogle Scholar .

15 Rorty, , Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, p. 29Google Scholar .

16 Rorty, , Philosophy as Cultural Politics, p. 45Google Scholar .

17 Rorty, , Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, p. 80Google Scholar .

18 Ibid.

19 Ibid., p. 93.

20 Ibid., p. xvi.

21 Rorty, Richard, Truth and Progress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 184CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

22 Rorty, , Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, p. 94Google Scholar .

23 See, for example, Cooper, Andrew, Celebrity Diplomacy (Boulder: Paradigm Publishing, 2007)Google Scholar .

24 Rorty, , Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, p. 206Google Scholar .

25 Ibid., p. 204.

26 Ibid., p. 202.

27 Ibid., p. 206.

28 Rorty, , Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, p. xviGoogle Scholar .

29 Cochran, Molly, Normative Theory in International Relations: A Pragmatic Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Others who have considered the implications of Rorty's thought for normative issues in International Relations include Brassett, James, ‘Richard Rorty’, in Edkins, Jenny and Vaughan-Williams, Nick (eds), Critical Theorists and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2009), pp. 278–291Google Scholar ; Festenstein, Matthew, ‘Pragmatism's Boundaries’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31 (2002), pp. 549–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; and Jordaan, Eduard, ‘Richard Rorty and Moral Progress in Global Relations’, Politikon, 33 (2006), pp. 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

30 In a brief response to Cochran, Rorty admitted that his distinction between the public and the private was ‘fuzzy’, but continued to defend its usefulness, Rorty, Richard, ‘Response to Molly Cochran’, in Festenstein, Matthew and Thompson, Simon (eds), Richard Rorty: Critical Dialogues (Cambridge: Polity, 2001), p. 202Google Scholar .

31 Linklater, Andrew, Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations (London: Macmillan, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

32 Linklater, Andrew, The Tranformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (Oxford: Polity, 1998), p. 6Google Scholar .

33 Ibid., p. 28.

34 Ibid., p. 3.

35 Ibid., p. 7.

36 Linklater, Andrew, Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, sovereignty and humanity (London: Routledge, 2007), p. 31Google Scholar .

37 Linklater, , Transformation, p. 146Google Scholar .

38 Ibid., p. 158.

39 Ibid., p. 4.

40 Ibid., p. 144.

41 Ibid., p. 6.

42 Ibid., p. 117.

43 Linklater, , Critical Theory, p. 97Google Scholar .

44 Linklater, , Transformation, p. 91Google Scholar ; see also Habermas, Jürgen, Communication and the Evolution of Society (Boston: Beacon Press, 1979), p. 77Google Scholar .

45 Ibid., p. 107.

46 Ibid., p. 91.

47 Habermas, Jürgen, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990), p. 65Google Scholar .

48 Ibid., p. 105.

49 Linklater, , Transformation, p. 86Google Scholar .

50 Ibid., p. 26.

51 Ibid., pp. 129–90.

52 Ibid., p. 144.

53 Habermas, Jürgen, The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001), p. 74Google Scholar ; The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998), p. 118.

54 Linklater, , Critical Theory, p. 36Google Scholar .

55 Linklater, , Transformation, p. 197Google Scholar .

56 Ibid., p. 8.

57 Habermas, , The Inclusion of the Other and The Postnational Constellation.Google Scholar

58 Shapcott, , Justice, Community and Dialogue, p. 123Google Scholar .

59 Linklater, , Critical Theory, pp. 51, 36Google Scholar .

60 Shapcott, , Justice, Community and Dialogue, p. 98Google Scholar .

61 Ibid., p. 31.

62 Ibid., p. 26.

63 Ibid., p. 3.

64 Ibid.

65 As Warnke has noted, Gadamer is rather ambivalent about consensus as a goal of conversation, Warnke, Georgia, Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987), p. 169Google Scholar .

66 Dallmayr, Fred, Alternative Visions: Paths in the Global Village (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998), pp. 7, 256Google Scholar .

67 Ibid., p. 257.

68 Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method (London: Continuum, 2004), p. 304Google Scholar .

69 Ibid., pp. 304, 301.

70 Ibid., p. 301; Shapcott, , Justice, Community and Dialogue, p. 171Google Scholar .

71 Gadamer, , Truth and Method, p. 305Google Scholar ; Shapcott, , Justice, Community and Dialogue, p. 131Google Scholar .

72 Gadamer, , Truth and Method, p. 301Google Scholar .

73 Shapcott, , Justice, Community and Dialogue, p. 187Google Scholar .

74 Warnke, , Gadamer, p. 174Google Scholar .

75 Shapcott, , Justice, Community and Dialogue, p. 235Google Scholar .

76 Ibid., p. 132.

77 Ibid., p. 159.

78 Ibid., p. 132.

79 Ibid., pp. 163, 167, 176.

80 Ibid., p. 167.

81 Ibid., p. 160.

82 It has not been mentioned that entry into genuine dialogue with others also requires ‘good will’ towards them, Shapcott, , Justice, Community and Dialogue, p. 200Google Scholar . The need for good will towards others corresponds to moments of generosity identified in the other approaches under discussion. However, in the context of the argument to which this footnote pertains, the requirement of good will further stacks the deck against Shapcott's emphasis on our shared capacity for language and understanding as the main source of expanded moral concern.

83 Giddens, Anthony, The Consequences of Modernity (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990), pp. 36–45Google Scholar .

84 Shapcott's position would also exclude fundamentalists from dialogue, for they, by definition, deny their not-knowing and are not ‘prepared to question their own truth claims’, Justice, Community and Dialogue, p. 169.

85 A possible solution for Shapcott might lie in demanding less from others than from oneself, specifically giving up the requirement that one's conversational partners acknowledge their finitude or question their own truth claims. However, Shapcott is unlikely to take this route, as he rejects a Levinasian ‘placing the other at a height’ because it ‘is not a relationship of equality as such’, Justice, Community and Dialogue, pp. 104–5.

86 Erskine, Toni, Embedded Cosmopolitanism: Duties to Strangers and Enemies in a World of ‘Dislocated Communities’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

87 Ibid., p. 15.

88 Ibid., p. 41.

89 Erkine draws most heavily on Friedman, Marilyn, ‘Feminism and Modern Friendship: Dislocating the Community’, Ethics, 99 (1989), pp. 275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

90 Gilligan, Carol, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar .

91 Erskine, , Embedded Cosmopolitanism, pp. 158, 162Google Scholar .

92 Ibid., p. 176.

93 Ibid.

94 Ibid.

95 Friedman, ‘Feminism and Modern Friendship’, p. 282.

96 Erskine, , Embedded Cosmopolitanism, pp. 177–178Google Scholar .

97 Ibid., p. 216.

98 Ibid., p. 178.

99 The same criticism applies to Bhabha's vernacular cosmopolitanism.

100 Texts that set the agenda for subsequent cosmopolitan discussion, include Beitz, Charles, Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979)Google Scholar ; Singer, Peter, ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1 (1972), pp. 229–243Google Scholar ; and Shue, Henry, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and US Foreign Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980)Google Scholar .

101 A partial exception is suggested by the title of an article by Dallmayr, Fred, ‘Globalisation and Inequality: A Plea for Global Justice’, International Studies Review, 4 (2001), pp. 137–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Unfortunately, this article is primarily a review of somewhat unrelated books and gives no indication about the links between Gadamerian cosmopolitanism and distributive justice.

102 Pogge, World Poverty; Singer, ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’.

103 Levinas's ideas have found some application in the field of International Ethics, most significantly in Campbell, David, ‘The Deterritorialization of Responsibility: Levinas, Derrida, and Ethics after the End of Philosophy’, Alternatives, 19 (1996), pp. 455–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Recent pieces that relate Levinas to matters global justice, include Avsar, Servan Adar, ‘Responsive Ethics and the War against Terrorism: A Levinasian Perspective, Journal of Global Ethics, 3 (2007), pp. 317–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Dauphinee, Elizabeth, ‘Emmanuel Levinas’, in Edkins, and Vaughan-Williams, , Critical Theorists, pp. 235–245Google Scholar ; Jordaan, Eduard, ‘Cosmopolitanism, Freedom and Indifference: A Levinasian View’, Alternatives, 34 (2009), pp. 83–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; and Schiff, Jacob, ‘The Trouble with “Never Again!”: Rereading Levinas for Genocide Prevention and Critical International Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 36 (2007), pp. 22–47Google Scholar .

104 Levinas, Emmanuel, Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1985), p. 75Google Scholar .

105 Levinas, Emmanuel, Collected Philosophical Papers (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987), p. 49CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

106 Levinas, Emmanuel, Entre Nous: On Thinking-of-the-Other (London: Athlone Press, 1998), p. 9Google Scholar .

107 Levinas, , Collected Philosophical Papers, p. 20Google Scholar .

108 Levinas, Entre Nous, p. 9.

109 Levinas, Emmanuel, Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1969), p. 223Google Scholar .

110 Levinas, Emmanuel, Basic Philosophical Writings (Indianapolis: University of Indiana Press, 1996), p. 12Google Scholar .

111 Ibid., p. 81.

112 Levinas, , Collected Philosophical Papers, p. 19Google Scholar .

113 Levinas, , Entre Nous, p. 33Google Scholar .

114 Levinas, , Collected Philosophical Papers, p. 55Google Scholar .

115 Levinas, , Entre Nous, p. 148Google Scholar .

116 Levinas, , Totality and Infinity, p. 171Google Scholar .

117 Ibid., p. 303.

118 Levinas, Emmanuel, The Levinas Reader (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989), p. 85Google Scholar .

119 Ibid., p. 86.

120 Levinas, , Entre Nous, p. 144Google Scholar .

121 Ibid., pp. 58–9, emphasis removed.

122 Ibid., p. 105.

123 Levinas, , Totality and Infinity, pp. 244–245Google Scholar .

124 Levinas, Emmanuel, Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence (The Hague: Marthinus Nijhoff, 1989), p. 112Google Scholar .

125 Levinas, , Basic Philosophical Writings, p. 82Google Scholar .

126 Levinas, , Totality and Infinity, p. 213Google Scholar .

127 Levinas, , Otherwise than Being, p. 128Google Scholar .

128 Levinas, Emmanuel and Kearney, Richard, ‘Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas’, in Cohen, Richard (ed.), Face to Face with Levinas (Albany: SUNY Press, 1986), p. 21Google Scholar .

129 In the vocabulary of Levinas's later writings, the ‘saying’, the pre-linguistic ethical relation between self and other, needs the ontological, representational language of the ‘said’ to respond to the other in concrete terms, even if this effort to say what cannot be said amounts to a ‘betrayal’, albeit a betrayal that should always be ‘unsaid’, Levinas, , Otherwise than Being, p. 7Google Scholar and Basic Philosophical Writings, p. 107.

130 Levinas, , Basic Philosophical Writings, p. 23Google Scholar .

131 Levinas, , Entre Nous, p. 229Google Scholar .

132 Levinas, , The Levinas Reader, p. 242Google Scholar .

133 Simmons, William, ‘The Third: Levinas's Theoretical Move from An-archical Ethics to the Realm of Justice and Politics’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 25 (1999), p. 94Google Scholar .

134 Levinas, , Entre Nous, p. 21Google Scholar .

135 Levinas, , Otherwise than Being, p. 160Google Scholar .

136 Levinas, Emmanuel, Difficult Freedom: Essays on Judaism (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990), p. 232Google Scholar .

137 Linklater, , Transformation, p. 142Google Scholar ; Pogge, , World PovertyCrossRefGoogle Scholar .

138 Jordaan, ‘Cosmopolitanism’.