Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T23:25:40.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motivating cocoa farmers to adopt agroforestry practices for mitigating climate change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2021

Kayode Arimi Open the ORCID record for Kayode Arimi [Opens in a new window]  and
Ayodeji Omoare Open the ORCID record for Ayodeji Omoare [Opens in a new window]
Kayode Arimi*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Extension and Management, Ibadan Study Centre, National Open University of Nigeria, Ibadan, Nigeria DLC, Center for General Studies, University of Ibadan
Ayodeji Omoare
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Education, Federal College of Education, Osiele, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria
*
Author for correspondence: Kayode Arimi, E-mail: arimi2009@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the adverse effects of climate change becoming more prominent, more effective strategies for reducing the increase in atmospheric CO2 levels are required for mitigating further climate change. Increasing use of renewable energy by farmers motivated to practice agroforestry is one natural solution for reducing those climate change impacts. Unfortunately, climate change mitigation through agroforestry has been inhibited by a lack of scientific validation. In this paper, we ascertain factors that motivate African cocoa farmers to use agroforestry practices for enhancing food production as well as for mitigating climate change. We analyzed data collected from 120 farmers from the Oyo state of Nigeria through descriptive and regression analysis statistical tools. We found that access to information (β = 0.23, t = 2.18) and extension service (β = 0.23, t = 2.27) was associated with greater willingness of farmers to participate in agroforestry whereas negative attitudes (β = −0.29, t = −3.21) were associated with a lower involvement of cocoa farmers in agroforestry practices. We conclude that effective climate change mitigation programs need to do more to motivate farmers to adopt agroforestry practices by increasing their understanding of the benefits to be derived from carbon markets and by providing them with the necessary tools for employing these practices for climate change mitigation and more sustainable food production.

Keywords

Agroforestrycarbon marketclimate change mitigationcocoa productionfarmers’ attitude
Type
Research Paper
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , December 2021 , pp. 599 - 604
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adeoye, GO and Adeoluwa, OO (2013) Agronomy as a science. In Olajuyigbe, SO and AdeOluwa, OO (eds), Agriculture, Renewable Natural Resources, Animal Husbandry and Health, 5th Edn. Ibadan: CGS University of Ibadan Press, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
Apata, TG (2011) Factors influencing the perception and choice of adaptation measures to climate change among farmers in Nigeria. Evidence from farm households in Southwest Nigeria. Environmental Economics 2, 74–83.Google Scholar
Arimi, K (2014) Determinants of climate change adaptation strategies used by rice farmers in Southwestern, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS) 115, 91–99.Google Scholar
Arimi, SK (2020) Climate change adaptation and resilience among vegetable farmers. International Journal of Vegetable Science. doi:10.1080/19315260.2020.1861160.Google Scholar
Badubi, RM (2017) Theories of motivation and their application in organizations: a risk analysis. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development 3, 44–51.10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.33.2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baya, BB, Nzeadibe, CT, Nwosu, OE and Uzomah, LN (2019) Climate change, food insecurity and household adaptation mechanisms in Amaro Ward, Southern Region of Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development 11, 106–113.Google Scholar
Carter, JG, Cavan, G, Connelly, A, Guy, S, Handley, J and Kazmierczak, A (2015) Climate change and the city: building capacity for urban adaptation. Progress in Planning 95, 1–66.10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, HL, Li, E, Nuberg, I and Bruwer, J (2019) Factors influencing the adaptation of farmers in response to climate change: a review. Climate and Development. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2018.1562866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollisso D, A and Martin, AR (2017) Perceptions regarding adult learners motivation to participate in educational programs. Journal of Agricultural Education 38, 38–46.Google Scholar
Dong-Ho, L, Dong-hwan, K and Seong-il, K (2018) Characteristics of forest carbon credit transactions in the voluntary carbon market. Climate Policy 18, 235–245.Google Scholar
Hairiah, K, Widianto, W, Suprayogo, D and van-Noordwijk, M (2020) Tree roots anchoring and binding soil: reducing landslide risk in Indonesian agroforestry. Land 9, 256.10.3390/land9080256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ifejika Speranza, C (2010) Resilient Adaptation to Climate Change in African Agriculture. Bonn, Germany: German Development Institute.Google Scholar
Matocha, J, Schroth, G, Hills, T and Hole, D (2012) Integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry and ecosystem conservation. In Nair, PK and Garrity, D (eds), Agroforestry—The Future of Global Land Use. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 105–126.10.1007/978-94-007-4676-3_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbow, C, Van Noordwijk, M, Luedeling, E, Neufeldt, H, Minang, PA and Kowero, G (2014) Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6, 61–67.10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, SS, Catacutan, D, Ajayi, OC and Sileshi, GW (2015) The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 13, 40–54.10.1080/14735903.2014.912493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, AK, Snyder, AS and Kilgore, AM (2012) An assessment of forest landowner interest in selling forest carbon credits in the Lake States, USA. Forest Policy and Economics 25, 113–122.10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minnemeyer, S, Harris, N and Octavia Payne, O (2017) Conserving Forests Could Cut Carbon Emissions as much as Getting Rid of Every Car on Earth. America: Global Forest Watch. pp. 1–15. Available online at http://www.wri.org/blog/2017/11/.Google Scholar
Molua, LE (2005) The economics of tropical agroforestry systems: the case of agroforestry farms in Cameroon. Forest Policy and Economics 7, 199–211.10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00032-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagnini, F and Nair, P (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry system. Agroforestry System 61, 281.Google Scholar
Novlloyd, EC, Gerald, TM and Eugenia, AL (2019) What motivates farmers to adopt agroforestry? A contingent valuation. International Research Journal of Social Sciences 8, 1–10.Google Scholar
Nyadzia, E, Nyamekye, BA, Wernersa, ES, Biesbroekb, GR, Dewulfb, A, Slobbea, EV, Termeerb, CJAM and Ludwiga, F (2018) Diagnosing the potential of hydro-climatic information services to support rice farming in northern Ghana. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 86–87, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2018.07.002Google Scholar
Nyong, AP, Ngankam, TM and Felicite, TL (2020) Enhancement of resilience to climate variability and change through agroforestry practices in smallholder farming systems in Cameroon. Agroforestry System 94, 687–705.10.1007/s10457-019-00435-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofori-Frimpong, K, Afrifa, AA and Acquaye, S (2010) Impact of shade and cocoa plant densities on soil organic carbon sequestration rates in a cocoa growing soil of Ghana. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 4, 621–624.Google Scholar
Olorunfemi, TO, Olorunfemi, OD and Oladele, OI (2018) Determinants of the involvement of extension agents in disseminating climate smart agricultural initiatives: implication for scaling up. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 52, 1–8.Google Scholar
Ragasa, C, Ulimwengu, J, Randriamamonjy, J and Badibanga, T (2016) Factors affecting performance of agricultural extension: evidence from Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 22, 113–143.10.1080/1389224X.2015.1026363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichle, ED (2020) The Global Carbon Cycle and Climate Change: Scaling Ecological Energetics from Organism to the Biosphere. USA: Elsevier, pp. 253–287.10.1016/B978-0-12-820244-9.00012-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidaa, TS, Baudronb, F, Kima, H and Giller, EK (2018) Climate-smart agroforestry: Faidherbia albida trees buffer wheat against climatic extremes in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 248, 339–347.10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikstus, G, Riyami, S, Ikram, HM, Mustakim, N, Kurniatun, H, Daniel, U and Noor, M (2020) Soil organic matter, mitigation of and adaptation to climate change in cocoa–based agroforestry systems. Land 9, 323.Google Scholar
Somarribaa, E, Cerdaa, R, Orozcoa, L, Cifuentesa, M, Dávilaa, H, Espina, T, Mavisoya, H, Ávilaa, G, Alvaradoa, E, Povedaa, V, Astorgaa, C, Saya, E and Deheuvels, O (2013) Carbon stocks and cocoa yields in agroforestry systems of Central America. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 173, 46–57.10.1016/j.agee.2013.04.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R, Butterfield, R, Lourenço, TC, Dzebo, A, Carlsen, H and Klein, JTR (2020) Surveying perceptions and practices of high-end climate change. Climatic Change 160, 1–23.Google Scholar
Zou, S, Maughan, BJ, Giles, PA, Vikhlinin, A, Pacaud, F, Burenin, R and Hornstrup, A (2016) The X-ray luminosity-temperature relation of a complete sample of low-mass galaxy clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463, 820–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar