Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-8vdwt Total loading time: 0.312 Render date: 2021-10-26T13:19:51.436Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Building farmers' capacity for innovation generation: Insights from rural Ghana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2017

Justice A. Tambo*
Affiliation:
Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Tobias Wünscher
Affiliation:
Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
*

Abstract

Innovation is essential for agricultural and economic development, especially in today's rapidly changing global environment. While farmers have been recognized as innovation generators, many innovation studies continue to consider them as recipients or adopters of externally promoted innovations only. Based on household data from Ghana, this study, in contrast, investigates the innovation-generating behavior among rural farmers. Inspired by two innovation theories—induced innovation and innovation systems—we specifically focus on how to build the capacity of farmers to generate innovations. Controlling for selection bias, we show that participation in farmer field fora (FFF), a participatory extension approach, can play a positive role in strengthening farmers' innovation-generating capacity. Specifically, we show that FFF participants have about 27% higher probability of generating innovations than non-participants, and FFF participation appears to increase the number of innovation-generating practices implemented by a farm household by about 49%. However, we do not find significant spillover effects of FFF on the innovation-generating capacity of non-participants, which has implications for the cost-effectiveness of the FFF program. The results also indicate that education and risk preference are important drivers of farmers' innovations. We conclude that policies for the generation of innovations among farmers should focus on building innovation capacity through institutional arrangements that permit interactions and learning between stakeholders.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bentley, J.W. 2006. Folk experiments. Agriculture and Human Values 23:451462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, S.D. and Clay, E.J. 1981. Sources of innovation in agricultural technology. World Development 9:321336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binswanger, H.P. 1980. Attitudes toward risk, experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62:395407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caliendo, M. and Kopeinig, S. 2008. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys 22:3172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K., Nkonya, E., Kato, E., Mekonnen, D.A., Odendo, M., Miiro, R., and Nkuba, J. 2012. Impact of farmer field schools on agricultural productivity and poverty in East Africa. World Development 40:402413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbaugh, M.J., Donnermeyer, J.F., Amujal, M., and Kidoido, M. 2010. Assessing the impact of farmer field school participation on IPM adoption in Uganda. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 17:518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenson, R.E. and Gollin, D. 2003. Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 300:758762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feder, G., Just, R.E., and Zilberman, D. 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33:255298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, G., Murgai, R., and Quizon, J.B. 2004a. The acquisition and diffusion of knowledge: The case of pest management training in farmer field schools, Indonesia. Journal of Agricultural Economics 55:221243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, G., Murgai, R., and Quizon, J.B. 2004b. Sending farmers back to school: the impact of farmer field schools in Indonesia. Review of Agricultural Economics 26:4562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filmer, D. and Pritchett, L.H. 2001. Estimating wealth effect without expenditure data-or tears: an application to educational enrolments in states of India. Demography 38:115132.Google Scholar
Fischer, E. and Qaim, M. 2012. Gender, agricultural commercialization, and collective action in Kenya. Food Security 4:441453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friis-Hansen, E. and Duveskog, D. 2012. The empowerment route to well-being: an analysis of farmer field schools in East Africa. World Development 40:414427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gbadugui, B.J. and Coulibaly, O. 2013. PRONAF's Farmer Field Fora FFF. MEAS HRD Case Study Series, # 2. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Cotonou.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 1993. Agricultural innovation in three areas of Kenya: Neo-Boserupian theories and regional characterization. Economic Geography 69:4471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G.W. and Rutström, E.E. 2008. Risk aversion in the laboratory. Research in Experimental Economics 12:41196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayami, Y. and Ruttan, V.W. 1985. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective (Revised and Expanded). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Jalan, J. and Ravallion, M. 2003. Does piped water reduce diarrhea for children in rural India? Journal of Econometrics 112:153173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitgeb, F., Kummer, S., Funes-Monzote, F.R., and Vog, C.R. 2014. Farmers’ experiments in Cuba. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 29:4864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, T. and Benton, T.G. 2014. Engage farmers in research. Nature 509:2527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masset, E. and Haddad, L. 2015. Does beneficiary farmer feedback improve project performance? An impact study of a participatory monitoring intervention in Mindanao, Philippines. The Journal of Development Studies 51:287304.Google Scholar
Miranda, A. and Rabe-Hesketh, S. 2006. Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching and sample selection models for binary, ordinal, and count variables. The Stata Journal 6:285308.Google Scholar
Nederlof, S., Wongtschowski, M., and van der Lee, F. (eds). 2011. Putting Heads Together. Agricultural Innovation Platforms in Practice. Bulletin 396. KIT Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Reij, C. and Waters-Bayer, A. (eds). 2001. Farmer Innovation in Africa: A Source of Inspiration for Agricultural Development. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
Rhoades, R. 1989. The role of farmers in the creation of agricultural technology. In R. Chambers, A. Pacey, and L.A. Thrupp (eds). Farmers First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research. Intermediate Technical Publications, London, p. 39.Google Scholar
Rola, A.C., Jamais, S.B., and Quizon, J.B. 2002. Do farmer field school graduates retain and share what they learn? An investigation in Iloilo, Philippines. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 9:6576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röling, N. 2009a. Pathways for impact: Scientists’ different perspectives on agricultural innovation. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 7:8394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röling, N. 2009b. Conceptual and methodological developments in innovation. In: P. Sanginga, A. Waters-Bayer, S. Kaaria, J. Njuki, and C. Wettasinha (eds). Innovation Africa: Enriching Farmers' Livelihoods. Earthscan, London, p. 934.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:4155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, P.R. 2002. Observational Studies. 2nd ed. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runge-Metzger, A. and Diehl, L. 1993. Farm household systems in northern Ghana. A case study in farming systems oriented research for the development of improved crop production systems. Nyankpala Agricultural Research Report No. 9.Google Scholar
Ruthenberg, H. 1971. Farming Systems in the Tropics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sanginga, P., Waters Bayer, A., Kaaria, S., Njuki, J., and Wettasinha, C. (eds). 2009. Innovation Africa: Enriching Farmers’ Livelihoods. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
Scoones, I. and Thompson, J. (eds). 2009. Farmer First Revisited: Innovation for Agricultural Research and Development. Practical Action Publishing, Bourton on Dunsmore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielman, D.J. 2005. Innovation Systems Perspectives on Developing-Agriculture: A Critical Appraisal. ISNAR Discussion Paper 2. International Food Policy Research Institute IFPRI, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Sunding, D.L. and Zilberman, D. 2001. The agricultural innovation process: research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector. In Gardner, B. and Rausser, G. (eds). Handbook of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Handbook of Agricultural and Resource Economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Vol. 1. Chapter 4, p. 207261.Google Scholar
Tambo, J.A. and Abdoulaye, T. 2012. Climate change and agricultural technology adoption: The case of drought tolerant maize in rural Nigeria. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17:277292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambo, J.A. and Wünscher, T. 2015. Identification and prioritization of farmers’ innovations in northern Ghana. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 30:537549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambo, J.A. and Wünscher, T. 2016. Beyond Adoption: Welfare Effects of Farmer Innovation Behaviour in Ghana. ZEF—Discussion Papers on Development Policy No. 216, Center for Development Research, Bonn.Google Scholar
Tripp, R., Wijeratne, M., and Piyadasa, V.H. 2005. What should we expect from farmer field schools? A Sri Lanka case study. World Development 33:17051720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters-Bayer, A. and Bayer, W. 2009. Enhancing local innovation to improve water productivity in crop–livestock systems. The Rangeland Journal 31:231235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters-Bayer, A., van Veldhuizen, L., Wongtschowski, M., and Wettasinha, C. 2009. Recognizing and enhancing processes of local innovation. In P. Sanginga, A. Waters-Bayer, S. Kaaria, J. Njuki, and C. Wettasinha (eds). Innovation Africa: Enriching Farmers’ Livelihoods. Earthscan, London, p. 239254.Google Scholar
World Bank 2011. Agricultural Innovation Systems: An Investment Source Book. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
4
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Building farmers' capacity for innovation generation: Insights from rural Ghana
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Building farmers' capacity for innovation generation: Insights from rural Ghana
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Building farmers' capacity for innovation generation: Insights from rural Ghana
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *