Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T12:22:08.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replicating Mysteries of the Passion: Rosso's Dead Christ with Angels*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Regina Stefaniak
Regina Stefaniak*
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During his sojourn in Rome from 1524 to 1527, Rosso painted a panel of a dead Christ with angels for his friend Leonardo Tornabuoni, bishop of Borgo San Sepolcro. Vasari saw the painting in the house of Giovanni della Casa at mid-century, but subsequently it was lost from general sight until the 1950s, when it was acquired by the Boston Museum of Fine Arts (Fig. 1). The panel has been assessed by art historians as one of signal importance, at once a high water mark in Rosso's own work and masterpiece of the early Roman maniera, a painting remarkable for its great beauty and artfulness, composed after long study of Michelangelo and the antique. The first considered estimation of the work emphasized its sculptural qualities, its formal tensions in pose and color, and its artistic virtuosity, suggesting that the subject was a version of the imago pietatis, reworked into a resurrecting Christ, emblematic of the patron's titular see. Although still impressed with the suavity of the panel in relation to Rosso's previous work, a subsequent critic was more conscious of its ambivalences, discerning a continuity with the young Rosso's individualistic and eccentric sensibilities, finally identifying the subject as an assertion of the eucharistic real presence. Analogies with language have been advanced, among them an allusion to the intensely equivocal nature of the painting. For one scholar the artfulness of the panel and Rosso's artistic attitudes were separate from their religious purpose; for another, they were absolutely at odds.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , Winter 1992 , pp. 677 - 738
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

For their comments on earlier versions of this essay I am grateful to Professors Loren Partridge, Andrew Stewart, and (at a later stage) Randolph Starn, all of the University of California, Berkeley. This essay grew out of my dissertation research, funded by the Italian Fulbright-Hays Commission, the Social Science Research Council, the Faculty of the Department of History of Art at Berkeley, and the Charlotte Newcombe Foundation. I wish to thank all these benefactors for their generous assistance.

References

Adams, J. The Latin Sexual I'ocabulary. Baltimore. 1982.Google Scholar
Atallah, Wahib. Adonis dans la litterature et I'art grees. Paris, 1966.Google Scholar
Berliner, Rudolf. “Zur Sinnesdeutung der Ahrenmadonna.” Die christliche Knnst 26 (1929-1930):97–112.Google Scholar
Biel, Gabriel. Sacri canonis missae expositio. Ed. Obcrmann, H. and Courtenay, W.. Wiesbaden, 1967.Google Scholar
Borresen, Kari. Subordination ct Equivalence: Nature ct rôle de lafemnte d'après Augustin ct Thomas d'Aquin. Oslo, 1968.Google Scholar
Bornkamm, G. “Mysterion.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Ed. and trans. Bromily, G.. Grand Rapids, MI, 1976.Google Scholar
Botte, B. “Conficere corpus Christi.” Année théologiquc 8 (1947): 309-15.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. “Sur les mystères d'Eleusis.” Revue des Études Grecques 7$ (1962): 464- 73.Google Scholar
Browe, Peter. Die eucharistischeu Wander des Mittelaltcrs. Breslau, 1938.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley, 1979.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. HomoNccans. Trans. Bing, P.. Berkeley and London, 1983.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. Greek Religion. Cambridge, MA and London, 1985.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. Ancient Mystery Cults. Cambridge, MA and London, 1987.Google Scholar
Bynam, Carolyn Walker. “The Body of Christ in the Later Middle Ages: A Reply to Leo Steinberg.” Renaissance Quarterly 39 (1986): 399–439.Google Scholar
Cabassut, A., and Olphe-Galliard, M.. “Cantique des Cantiques.” in Dictionnaire de Spiritualité, ascetique, et mystique, doctrine et histoire. Ed. Viller, M., et al. 14 vols. Paris, 1950.Google Scholar
Cajetan, Tommaso de Vio. The Analogy of Names and the Concept of Being. [1496]. Trans. Bushinski, E. and Koren. Pittsburgh, H. and Louvain, 1959.Google Scholar
Cajetan, Tommaso de Vio. AdPraedicamenta Aristotelis [ 1506]. In The Analogy of Names and the Concept of Being. De errorihus contigentibus in eucharistiae sacramento = Instructio nuntii circa enores libelli de cena domini [1525]. Venice. 1531. Ed. vonGunten, F., Rome, 1962. Trans. Wicks, J in Cajetan Responds. Washington, D.C., 1978.Google Scholar
Cajetan, Tommaso de Vio. In Genesim [ 1530]. In In omnes autheuticos Veteris Testament! historiales libros & lob commentarii. Louvain, 1639.Google Scholar
Carroll, Eugene. Rosso Fiorcntino. Washington, D.C., 1987.Google Scholar
Chastel, André. The Sack of Rome. Princeton, NJ, 1983.Google Scholar
Clark, Francis. Eucharistic Sacrifice and the Reformation. Oxford, 1967.Google Scholar
Clement of Alexandria. Protrepticus. In Works. Trans. Butterworth, G.. Cambridge, MA. 1960.Google Scholar
Coffey, Rosemary. “The Man of Sorrows of Giovanni Bellini: Sources and Significance.” Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, 1987.Google Scholar
Denzinger, H., and Schönmetzer, A., eds. Enchiridion Symbolorum. Barcelona, 1963 ff.Google Scholar
Des Places, E. “Platon et la langue des mystères.“ Annates de la Facultédes lettres et sciences humaines d'Aix 38 (1964): 9–23.Google Scholar
Dölger, F. “Christus als himrnlischer Eros und Seelenbräuttigam bei Origenes.” Antike und Christentum 6 (1950): 272-75.Google Scholar
DeTolnay, Charles. Michelangelo. II. The Sistine Ceiling. Princeton, NJ, 1949.Google Scholar
Eck, Johannes. De sacrificio missae. In Johannes Eck: De sacrificio missae libri tres [1526]. Ed. Iserloh, E., Pfniir, V., and Fabisch, P.. Corpus Catholicorum, 36. Minister Westfalen, 1982.Google Scholar
Eisler, Colin. “The Golden Christ of Cor tona and the Man of Sorrows in Italy.” Art Bulletin 51 (1969): 107-18; 283-46.Google Scholar
Equicola, Mario. De natnra de ainore. Venice, 1525.Google Scholar
Foster, Leonard. The ley Fire. London, 1969.Google Scholar
Franklin, David. “Documents for Rosso in Sansepolcro.” Burlington Magazine 131 (1989): 817-27.Google Scholar
Freedberg, Sydney. Painting in Italy: 1500-1600. Harmondsworth and New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Giraldi, Lilio Gregorio. De deisgentium. Basil, 1548; fac. ed.. New York. 1976.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. “The Church and the Language of Mystery: The First Four Centuries.” Ephcmerides Theologkae Lovaniensis 53 (1977): 479-94.Google Scholar
Homeric Hymns. Trans. Athanassakis, A.. Baltimore, 1976.Google Scholar
Iserloh, E. Die Eucharistie in der Darstellung des Johannes Eck. Reformationsgeschichtliche Studien und Texte, 73/74. Münster Westfalen 1950.Google Scholar
Kerenyi, Karl. Eleusis: Archetypal Image of Mother and Daughter. London. 1967.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. Women, Family, and Ritual in Renaissance Italy. Trans. Lydia, Cochrane. Chicago and London, 1985.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar. Renaissance Concepts of Man. New York, 1972.Google Scholar
Leff, Gordon. William ojOckham. Manchester, 1975.Google Scholar
Lepin, M. L'Idéedu Sacrifice de la Messed'après les théologicns. Paris, 1926.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. Préhistoire de I'art occidental. Paris, 1965.Google Scholar
Macy, Gary. The Theologies of the Eucharist in the Early Scholastic Period. Oxford, 1984.Google Scholar
Marrow, James. Passion Iconography in Northern European Art of the Late Middle Ages and Early Renaissance. Kortrijk, 1979.Google Scholar
Niccoli, Ottavia. Prophecy and People in Renaissance Italy. Trans. Lydia, Cochrane. Princeton, NJ, 1990.Google Scholar
Obermann, Heiko. The Harvest of Medieval Theology: Gabriel Biel and Late Medieval Nominalism. Cambridge, MA. 1963.Google Scholar
O'Malley, John. Cites of Viterbo on Church and Reform. Leiden, 1968.Google Scholar
Origen, . The Song of Songs: Commentary and Homilies. Trans, and ed. R., Lawson. Ancient Christian Writers, 26. New York, 1957.Google Scholar
Osten, Gert van der. Der Schmerzensmann: Typengeschichte cines deutschen Andachtsbildwerkes von 13001ns 1600. Berlin, 1935.Google Scholar
Pickering, James, . Literature and Art in the Middle Ages. London, 1970.Google Scholar
Pico della, MirandolaGiovanni. “Oration on the Dignity of Man.” Trans. Forbes, E.. In Renaissance Philosophy of Man, ed. Cassirer, E. et al. Chicago and London, 1948.Google Scholar
Picus, Mirandula, loannis, Franciscus. De ainore divino. Rome, 1516.Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. “Imago Pietatis: Ein Beitrag zur Typengeschichte des Schmerzensmann und der Maria Mediatrix.” In Festschrift fur Max Friedländer, 261–308. Leipzig, 1927.Google Scholar
Pontanus, Jacobus. “De nuptiis loannis Brancati et Maritellae.” In loannis Ioiraui PontaniCarmina. Ed. Soldati, B.. Florence, 1902.Google Scholar
Pope-Hennessy, John. Italian Renaissance Sculpture. An Introduction to Italian Renaissance Sculpture, Part II. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Pope-Hennessy, John. Italian High Renaissance and Baroque Sculpture. An Introduction to Italian Renaissance Sculpture, Part III. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Pratzner, Ferdinand. Messe und Krcuzesopfer: Die Krise der sakramentalen Idee bei Luther und in der mittelalterlichcn Scholastik, Wiener Beiträge zur Theologie, 29. Vienna, 1970.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. Mysterienterminologie bei Platon, Philon und Klemens von Alexandria:. Berlin, 1987.Google Scholar
Robins, R. Ancient and Mediaeval Grammatical Theory in Europe. London, 1951.Google Scholar
Robins, R. A Short History of Linguistics. Bloomington, IN and London, 1972.Google Scholar
Sainctes, Claude de. Liturgiae, sive Missae. Antwerp, 1560.Google Scholar
Schatzgeyer, Kasper. De missae saerificio [1525]. In Kasper Schatzgeyer OFM: Schriften zur Verteidigung der Messe. Ed. Obermann, H. and Courtenay, W.. Wiesbaden, 1967.Google Scholar
Schatzgeyer, Kasper. Abwaschung des Vnfiats. [1525] In Kasper Schatzgeyer OFM: Schriften. Google Scholar
Schatzgeyer, Kasper. Replica de sanctissimo eucharistiae Sacramento [1527]. In Kasper Schatzgeyer OFM: Schriften. Google Scholar
Schatzgeyer, Kasper.Sacricanonismissaeexpositio. In Kaspcr Schatzgeyer OFM: Schriften. Google Scholar
Schiller, Gertrud. Iconography of Christian Art. Trans. Seligman, J.. 3 Vols. Greenwich. 1972.Google Scholar
Shearman, John. “Maniera as an Aesthetic Ideal.” In The Renaissance and Mannerism: Acts of the Twentieth International Congress of the History of Art. Princeton, NJ, 1963.Google Scholar
Shearman, John. “The Dead Christ by Rosso Fiorentino.” Boston Museum Bulletin 64 (1966): 148-72.Google Scholar
Shearman, John. Mannerism. Harmondsworth, 1968. Stefaniak, Regina. “An Interpretation of the Mythological Systems of Three Roman Renaissance Gardens within the Cultural Context of Late Sixteenth Century Rome.” Ph.diss, D.., University of California, Berkeley, 1989.Google Scholar
John, Shearman. “Raphael's Santa, Cecilia: A Fine and Private Vision of Virginity.” Art History 14(1991): 345-71.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Leo. “Michelangelo's Florentine Pietà: The Missing Leg Twenty Years Later.” Art Bulletin 71 (1989): 480–507.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alois. Die Darstellung Christi in der Keller. Quellen und Abhandlungen zur mittelrheinischen Kirchengeschichte, 37. Diisseldorf, 1981.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alois. “Die mystische Mühle.” Die christliche Kunst 31 (l934∼35): 129-39.Google Scholar
Thomas of, Erfurt. Grammatka Speailativa. Ed. and trans. Bursill-Hall, G.. London, 1972.Google Scholar
Titelmanus, Franciscus. Commentarii in Cantica Cauticorum. Paris, 1550.Google Scholar
Trexler, Richard. Public Life in Renaissance Florence. New York, 1980.Google Scholar
Vasari, Giorgio. Le vite de’ più eccellenti pittori, scultori, e architettori. Ed. Milanesi, G.. 9 vols. Florence, 1906.Google Scholar
Wind, Edgar. “The Revival of Origen.” In Miner, D., ed., Studies in Art and Literature for Belle da Costa Greene, 412-24. Princeton, NJ, 1954.Google Scholar
Wind, Edgar. Pagan Mysteries in the Renaissance. New York, 1968.Google Scholar
Zwingli, Huldrich. Commeiitarius de vera et Fälsa religione [1525]. In Huldreich Zwinglis Samtliche Werke, ed. Egli, E., et al. Leipzig, 1914.Google Scholar
Zwingli, Huldrich. The Latin Works of Huldreich Zwingli. Trans. Jackson, S., ed. Heller, C.. 3 vols. Philadelphia, 1929.Google Scholar