Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T20:34:48.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reception of Annius of Viterbo’s Forgeries: The Antiquities in Renaissance France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Marian Rothstein
Marian Rothstein*
Affiliation:
Carthage College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Annius of Viterbo’s 1498 “Antiquitatum Variarum Volumina XVII” (“Antiquities”), created to enhance the reputation of his native Viterbo, was a collection of spurious texts and commentary attributed to early Near Eastern authors of whom only fragments survive. Quickly spotted as spuria, they nonetheless flourished in France. This essay traces the use of Annius’s forgeries by Jean Lemaire de Belges, for whose “Illustrations” they were seminal; mid-sixteenth-century historians followed Lemaire’s lead. The “Antiquities” captivated Guillaume Postel and Guy Le Fèvre de la Boderie. They supported a history grounded on chronology, etymology, and genealogy, becoming essential to proofs of the glory and antiquity of France.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , Summer 2018 , pp. 580 - 609
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Renaissance Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelard, Jacques. Les Illustrations de Gaule et singularitez de Troye de Jean Lemaire de Belges étude des éditions, genèse de l’œuvre. Geneva: Droz, 1976.Google Scholar
Aneau, Barthélemy. Alector. Ed. Marie-Madeleine Fontaine. Geneva: Droz, 1996.Google Scholar
Viterbiensis, Annius [Giovanni Nanni]. Commentaria Fratris Joannis Annii Viterbiensis super Opera Diversorum Auctorum de Antiquitatibus Loquentium. Rome: Eucharius Silber, 1498.Google Scholar
Viterbiensis, Annius [Giovanni Nanni]. Antiquitatum Variarum Volumina XVII. Paris: Jodocus Badius, 1515. See http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k526066.Google Scholar
Asher, Ronald E. National Myths in Renaissance France. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Berrong, Richard. “Jean Lemaire de Belges, Dictys of Crete, and Giovanni Boccaccio: Possible Sources for Gargantua.” Etudes Rabelaisiennes 17 (1983): 89–92.Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni. Boccaccio on Poetry. Trans. Charles G. Osgood. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Bouwsma, William J. Concordia Mundi: The Career and Thought of Guillaume Postel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrozet, Giles. Les Antiques Erections de Gaules. Paris, 1535.Google Scholar
Crinitus, Petrus Riccio. De Honesta Disciplina. Florence, 1504.Google Scholar
Crinitus, Petrus Riccio. De Honesta Disciplina. Ed. Carlo Angeleri. Rome: Fratelli Bocca Editori, 1955.Google Scholar
Demaizière, Colette. “Michel de Castelnau, traducteur de Ramus.” In Traduction et adaptation en France à la fin du moyen âge et à la Renaissance, ed. Charles Bruckner, 283–93. Paris: Honoré Champion, 1997.Google Scholar
Desan, Philippe. “The Platonization of the Gauls or French History according to Ramus.” Argumentation 5 (1991): 375–86.Google Scholar
Doutrepont, Georges. Jean Lemaire de Belges et la Renaissance. Geneva: Droz, 1974.Google Scholar
Du Bellay, Guillaume. Epitome de l’antiquite des Gaules et de France. Paris, 1556. See at http://search.lib.virginia.edu/catalog/uva-lib:1074184.Google Scholar
Du Bellay, Joachim. Deffense et Illustration de la langue françoyse. Ed. Jean-Charles Monferran. Geneva: Droz, 2001.Google Scholar
Dubois, Claude-Gilbert. Celtes et Gaulois au XVIe siècle. Paris: J. Vrin, 1972.Google Scholar
Feldman, Louis H. Josephus’s Interpretation of the Bible. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Marie-Madeleine. “La Contribution de Bathélemy Aneau à ‘l’illustration’ de la langue française.” In Lyon et l’illustration de la langue française à la Renaissance, ed. Gérard Defaux, 481–504. Lyon: ENS Editions, 2003.Google Scholar
Goez, Werner. “Die Anfänge der historischen Methoden-Relexion in de italienischen Renaissance und Ihre Aufnahme in der Geschichtsschreibung des deutschen Humanismus.” Achiv für Kulturgeschichte 58 (1974): 25–48.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. “Joseph Scaliger and Historical Chronology.” History and Theory 14 (1975): 158–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Forgers and Critics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hotman, François. Franco-Gallia / La Gaule Française. Trans. Simon Goulart. Ed. Christiane Frémont. Paris: Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, 1991.Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville. Etymolgiarum sive Originum. Ed. W. M. Lindsay. 2 vols. Oxford, 1962.Google Scholar
Jodogne, Pierre. Jean Lemaire de Belges, écrivain franco-bourguignon. Brussels: Palais des académies, 1971.Google Scholar
Kuntz, Marion Leathers. Guillaume Postel, the Prophet of All Things. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Fèvre de la Boderie, Guy. La Galliade. Ed. François Roudaut. Paris: Klincksieck, 1993.Google Scholar
Lemaire de Belges, Jean. llustrations de Gaule et Singularitez de Troye. Vols. 1 and 2 of Oeuvres, 4 vols. Ed. Jean-August Stecher. Louvain, 1882–85.Google Scholar
Lemaire de Belges, Jean. Traité de la différence des schismes et des conciles (1511). Ed. Jennifer Britnell. Durham: University of Durham Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Le Rouillé, Guillaume. Le Recueil de l’antique préexcellence de Gaule et des Gaulois. Poitiers: J. and E. de Marnef, 1546.Google Scholar
Ligota, Christopher R. “Annius of Viterbo and Historical Method.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 50 (1987): 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meerhoff, Kees. “La Ramée et Peletier du Mans: Une Deffence du ‘naturel usage.’” Nouvelle Revue du seizième siècle 18.1 (2000): 77–93.Google Scholar
Ozouf, Mona. “Les Gaules de Clermont-Ferrand.” Le Débat 6 (1980): 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pliny [Gaius Plinius Secundus]. Natural History. Vol. 3. Ed. and trans. Harris Rackham. London: Heinemann, 1938.Google Scholar
Postel, Guillaume. De Originibus seu de Hebraicae Lingua. Paris, 1538.Google Scholar
Postel, Guillaume. Histoire memorable des expéditions depuys le Deluge faictes par les Gauloys ou Françoys depuis la France jusque en Asie. Paris, 1552.Google Scholar
Postel, Guillaume. Thrésor des prophéties de l’univers. Ed. François Secret. Leiden: Nijhoff, 1969.Google Scholar
Rabelais, François. Oeuvres. Ed. Mireille Huchon. Paris: Gallimard, 1994.Google Scholar
Ramus, Petrus, [Pierre de la Ramée]. De Moribus Veterum Gallorum. Paris, 1559.Google Scholar
Ronsard, Pierre de. La Franciade. In Œuvres completes, vols. XVI1–2. Ed. Paul Laumonier. Paris: Didier, 1950–52.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Marian. “Etymology, Genealogy, and the Immutability of Origins.” Renaissance Quarterly 43.3 (1990a): 332–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Marian. “Jean Lemaire de Belges’ Illustrations Gaule et Siingularitez de Troye: Politics and Unity.” Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 52.3 (1990b): 593–609.Google Scholar
Roudaut, François. Le Point Centrique. Paris: Klincksieck, 1992.Google Scholar
Sébillet, Thomas. Art poétique français. In Traités de poétique de la Renaissance, ed. Francis Goyet, 36–174. Paris: Librairie générale française, 1990.Google Scholar
Secret, François. Postel revisité: Nouvelles recherches sur Guillaume Postel et son milieu. Milan: S.É.H.A., 1998.Google Scholar
Stephens, Walter. “De Historia Gigantum: Theological Anthropology before Rabelais.” Traditio 40 (1984): 43–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, Walter. Giants in Those Days. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Stephens, Walter. “From Berossos to Berosus Chaldaeus: The Forgeries of Annius of Viterbo and Their Fortune.” The World of Berossos, Proceedings of the 4th International Colloquium on the Ancient Near East between Classical and Ancient Oriental Traditions, Hatfield College, Durham 7th–9th July 2010, ed. Johannes Haubold, Giovanni B. Lanfranchi, Robert Rollinger, and John Steele, 277–91. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2013.Google Scholar
Tigerstedt, Eugène Napoleon. “Johanes Annius and Graecia mendax.” In Classical Medieval and Renaissance Studies in Honor of Berthold Louis Ullman, ed. Charles Henderson Jr., 2:293–311. Rome: Storia e Letteratura, 1964.Google Scholar
Tory, Geoffroy. Champs fleury. Paris, 1529.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Robert J. Orientalism, Aramaic and Kabbalah in the Catholic Reformation: The First Printing of the Syriac New Testament. Leiden: Brill, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar