Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T06:36:00.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Montaigne's Consubstantial Book

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Marjorie O'Rourke Boyle
Marjorie O'Rourke Boyle*
Affiliation:
95 Normandy Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4L 3K4
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Jen'ay pas plus faict mon livre que mon livre m'a faict, livre consubstantiel à son autheur … ” (I have not made my book any more than my book has made me, a book consubstantial with its author). That was no ordinary assertion in plain language. Montaigne explained his Essais as “concerned with my own self, an integral part of my life; not concerned with some third-hand extraneous purpose, like all other books.” Its subject was uniquely himself. His usage of the term “consubstantial” projected his design beyond the literary theory of imitation into a theological paradigm of divinity.

Acknowledging that “well-known phrase” and “famous declaration,” literary criticism has much interpreted Montaigne's “consubstantial” book. Yet the slight mention of the word itself has been both undocumented and inaccurate.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1997 , pp. 723 - 749
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Das “Augsburger Bekenntnis” Deutsch 1530-1980. Ed. Gassmann, Gunther. Rev. text. Göttingen, 1988.Google Scholar
Beze, Theodore de.Histoire ecclesiastique des églises réformées au royaume de France. Ed. Baum, G. and Cunitz, Eduard. 3 vols. Paris, 1883-89.Google Scholar
Bowen, Barbara C. The Age of Bluff: Paradox and Ambiguity in Rabelais and Montaigne. Illinois Studies in Language and Literature, 62. Urbana, IL, 1972.Google Scholar
Bowen, Barbara C. “What Does Montaigne Mean by ‘marqueterie’?” Studies in Philology 67 (1970): 147–55.Google Scholar
Boyle, Marjorie O'Rourke. Erasmus on Language and Method in Theology. Erasmus Studies, 2. Toronto, 1977.Google Scholar
Brush, Craig B. From the Perspective of the Self: Montaigne's Self-Portrait. New York, 1994.Google Scholar
Braun, René. Deus Christianorum: Recherches sur le vocabulaire doctrinal de Tertullien. 2d ed. rev. Paris, 1977.Google Scholar
Brausseau-Beuermann, Christine. La copie de Montaigne: étude sur les citations dans les “Essais.” Études montaignistes, 3. Paris, 1989.Google Scholar
Browe, Peter. Die Eucharistischen Wunder des Mittelalters. Breslauer Studien zur historischen Theologie, 4. Breslau, 1938.Google Scholar
Calvin, Jean. Opera quae supersunt omnia. Ed. Reuss, Eduard, Cuntiz, Eduard, and Baum, Johann Wilhelm. Corpus reformatorum, 29-59. Brunswick, 1863-1900.Google Scholar
Calvin, Jean. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Trans. Battles, Ford Lewis. Grand Rapids, 1975.Google Scholar
Cavadini, John C. The Last Christology of the West: Adoptionism in Spain and Gaul, 785-820. Philadelphia, 1993.Google Scholar
Canones et decreta sacrosancti oecumen ici, et generalis concilii tridentini sub Paulo III, lulio III, Pio IIII pontificibus max. Rome, 1564.Google Scholar
Cave, Terence C. The Cornucopian Text: Problems of Writing in the French Renaissance. Oxford, 1979.Google Scholar
Compagnon, Antoine. Nous, Michel de Montaigne. Paris, 1980.Google Scholar
(Confessio augustana.) Der authentische lateinische Text der “Confessio augustana.” Ed. Bornkamm, Heinrich. Heidelberg, 1956.Google Scholar
Cottrell, Robert D. Sexuality / Textuality: A Study of the Fabric of Montaigne's Essays. Columbus, 1981.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst R. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Trans. Trask, Willard R.. New York, 1953.Google Scholar
D'Amico, John F. Theory and Practice in Renaissance Textual Criticism: Beatus Rhenanus between Conjecture and History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1988.Google Scholar
D'Amico, John F. “Beatus Rhenanus, Tertullian, and the Reformation: A Humanist's Critique of Scholasticism.” Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte 71 (1980): 37–63.Google Scholar
D'Amico, John F. “The Progress of Renaissance Latin Prose: The Case of Apuleianism.” Renaissance Quarterly 37 (1984): 351-92.Google Scholar
Defaux, Gérard. “Readings of Montaigne.” Trans. Gallucci, John A.. Yale French Studies 64 (1983): 73–92.Google Scholar
Dictionarium latino gallicum, thesauro nostra. Paris, 1539.Google Scholar
Dictionnaire francoislatin, contenant les motz & manieres de parler Francois, tournez en Latin. Paris, 1539.Google Scholar
Erasmus, . Opera omnia. Ed. Clericus, Johannes. 11 vols. Leiden, 1703-06.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio, ed. Prosatori latini del quattrocento. La letteratura italiani, storia e testi, 13. Milan, 1952.Google Scholar
Glidden, Hope H. “The Face in the Text: Montaigne's Emblematic Self-Portrait (Essais III:12).” Renaissance Quarterly 46 (1993): 71–97.Google Scholar
Goering, Joseph. “The Invention of Transubstantiation.” Traditio 46 (1991): 147-70.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven, 1982.Google Scholar
Huguet, Edmond. Dictionnaire de la langue francaise du seizième Siècle. 7 vols. Paris, 1925.Google Scholar
Jansen, Reiner. Studien zu Luthers Trinitätslehre. Basler und Berner Studien zur historischen und systematischen Theologie, 26. Bern, 1976.Google Scholar
Jerome, . (Epistolae). Lettres. Ed. Labourt, Jerome. 6 vols. Paris, 1949-58.Google Scholar
Jungman, Joseph A. The Mass of the Roman Rite: Its Origins and Development (Missarum sollemnia). Trans. Brunner, Francis A.. 2 vols. New York, 1950.Google Scholar
Keating, L. Clark. Etienne Pasquier. New York, 1972.Google Scholar
Kellerman, Frederick. “Montaigne, Reader of Plato.” Comparative Literature 8 (1956): 307–22.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. N. D. Early Christian Creeds. 3d ed. London, 1972.Google Scholar
Kritzman, Lawrence D. “My Body, My Text: Montaigne and the Rhetoric of Sexuality.” In Michel de Montaigne's “Essays,” ed. Bloom, Harold, 81–95. New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Krös, Börje. “Les citations grecques de Montaigne.” Eranos 44 (1946): 460-83.Google Scholar
Lery, Jean de. Historie d'un voyage fait en la terre de Bresil autrement dite Amerique. Paris, 1980.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Paul. “Tertullien im Mittelalter.” In idem, Erforschung des Mittelalters: ausgewählte Abhandlungen und Aufsätze, 5:184-99. 5 vols. Leipzig, 1941.Google Scholar
Littré, Emile. Dictionnaire de la langue française. 4 vols. Paris, 1883.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. Werke. 58 vols. Weimar; rpt. Graz, 1964.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. “Against Latomus.” Trans. Lindbeck, George. In Luther's Works, 32:243-44. Philadelphia, 1958.Google Scholar
Macy, Gary. “The Dogma of Transubstantiation in the Middle Ages.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 45 (1994): 11–41.Google Scholar
Maingt, Joseph. Théologie trinitaire de Tertullien. Théologie, 68-70, 75. 4 vols. Paris, 1966.Google Scholar
Matheson, Peter. “Thomas Müntzer's Marginal Comments on Tertullian.” Journal of Theological Studies 41 (1990): 76–90.Google Scholar
Mathieu-Castellani, Gisèle.Montaigne: l'écriture de l'Essais. Paris, 1988.Google Scholar
McDonnell, Kilian. John Calvin, the Church, and the Eucharist. Princeton, 1967.Google Scholar
McKinley, Mary B. Words in a Corner: Studies in Montaigne's Latin Quotations. French Forum Monographs, 26. Lexington, KY, 1981.Google Scholar
Monfasani, John. “Ciceronianism.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, ed. Norton, Glyn P., vol. 3. Cambridge, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. The Complete Works of Montaigne. Trans. Frame, Donald M.. Stanford, 1967.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. Les “Essais” de Michel de Montaigne. Ed. Villey, Pierre, rev. Saulnier, V.-L.. Paris, 1965.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. Journal de voyage en Italie. Ed. Armaingaud, Arthur. 2 vols. Vols. 7-8 of Oeuvres completes. 12 vols. Paris, 1924-41.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. Lettres. Ed. Armaingaud, . In oeuvres complètes, 11:159–265.Google Scholar
Paré, Ambroise. Dix livres de la chirurgie. Paris, 1564; rpt. Paris, 1964.Google Scholar
Paré, Ambroise. Ten Books of Surgery with the Magazine of the Instruments Necessary for It. Trans. Whitelinker, Robert and Womack, Nathan. Athens, GA, 1969.Google Scholar
Pasquier, Estienne. Les lettres d'Estienne Pasquier conseiller et advocat general du roy en chambre des Comptes de Paris. Paris, 1586.Google Scholar
Pasquier, Estienne. Lettres familières. Ed. Thickett, Dorothy. Textes litteraires françaises, 203. Geneva, 1974.Google Scholar
Pasquier, Estienne. Lettres historiques pour les années 1556-1594. Ed. Thickett, Dorothy. Geneva, 1966.Google Scholar
Petrarch, . (Epistolae familiares). Le familiari. Ed. Rossi, V. and Bosco, U.. 4 vols. Edizione nazionale, 10–13. Florence, 1933-42.Google Scholar
Petrarch, . Letters on Familiar Matters: Rerum familiarum libri XVII-XXIV. Trans. Bernardo, Aldo S.. Baltimore, 1985.Google Scholar
Petrarch, . Rerum familiarum libri I-VIII. Trans. Bernardo, Aldo S.. Albany, NY, 1975.Google Scholar
Petrarch, . Petrarch's Lyric Poems: The “Rime sparse” and Other Lyrics. Ed. Durling, Robert M.. Cambridge, MA, 1976.Google Scholar
Pius, V, ed. Catechismus ex decreto Concilii tridentini, ad parochos. Rome, 1566.Google Scholar
Plato, . Opera. Ed. Burnet, John. 5 vols. Oxford, 1900-07.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Opera. Ed. Henry, Paul and Schwyzer, Hans-Rudolph. 3 vols. Paris, 1951.Google Scholar
Raitt, Jill. The Eucharistic Theology of Theodore Beza: Development of the Reformed Doctrine. American Academy of Religion Studies in Religion, 4. Chambersburg, PA, 1972.Google Scholar
Rawson, Claude. “‘Indians’ and Irish: Montaigne, Swift, and the Cannibal Question.” Modern Language Quarterly 53 (1992): 299–363.Google Scholar
Regosin, Richard L. Montaigne's Unruly Brood: Textual Engendering and the Challenge to Paternal Authority. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1996.Google Scholar
Regosin, Richard L. The Matter of My Book: Montaigne's “Essays” as the Book of the Self. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1977.Google Scholar
Rendall, Steven. “Distinguo”: Reading Montaigne Differently. Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
Rigolot, François. Les métamorphoses de Montaigne. Paris, 1988.Google Scholar
Sarpi, Paolo. Istoria del Concilia tridentino. Ed. Vivanti, Corrado. 2 vols. Nuova universals Einaudi, 156. Turin, 1974.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hermann. This Is My Body: Luther's Contention for the Real Presence in the Sacrament of the Altar. Rev. ed. Adelaide, , 1977.Google Scholar
Sayce, Richard. The “Essays” of Montaigne: A Critical Exploration. London, 1972.Google Scholar
Scève, Maurice. Microcosme. Ed. Giudici, Enzo. Paris, 1976.Google Scholar
Seneca, . Opera guae supersunt. Ed. Hasse, Friedrich. 3 vols, in 2. Leipzig, 1852-53.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean. Montaigne in Motion. Trans. Goldhammer, Arthur. Chicago, 1985.Google Scholar
Stead, Christopher. Divine Substance. Oxford, 1977.Google Scholar
Sweany, Suzanne Trocmé. Estienne Pasquier (1529-1615) et nationalisme littéraire. Paris, 1985.Google Scholar
Tertullian, . Opera. Ed. Kroyman, Aem. et al. 2 vols. Corpus christianorum serieslatina, 1-2. Turnhout, 1954.Google Scholar
Tertullian, . Apologeticus adversus gentes pro christianis. Ed. Bindley, T. Herbert. Oxford, 1889.Google Scholar
Tertullian, . Against Praxeas. Trans. Souter, A.. London, 1919.Google Scholar
Tertullian, . Apology. Trans. Rendall, Gerald H.. New York, 1931.Google Scholar
Tertullian, . Treatises on Penitence: On Penitence and On Purity. Trans. LeSaint, William P.. Ancient Christian Writers, 28. Westminster, MD, 1959.Google Scholar
Thickett, Dorothy. Estienne Pasquier (1529-1615): The Versatile Barrister of Sixteenth-Century France. London, 1979.Google Scholar
Urbina, I. Ortiz de. “L'homoousios’ preniceno.” Orientalia Christiana periodica 8 (1942): 194–209.Google Scholar
Villey, Pierre. Les sources et l'evolution des “Essais” de Montaigne. Bibliotheque de la Fondation Thiers, 14. 2 vols. Paris, 1908.Google Scholar
Wallace, Nathaniel. “The Subject of Repetition/Repetition of the Subject: ‘De la ressemblance des enfans aux pères’(EssaisII.37).” Romanic Review 84 (1993): 241–54.Google Scholar
Waszink, J.H. “Observations on Tertullian's Treatise against Hermogenes.” Vigiliae christianae 9 (1955): 129-47 .Google Scholar
Waszink, J.H., trans. The Treatise against Hermogenes. Ancient Christian Writers, 24. Westminster, MD, 1956.Google Scholar
Wohlmuth, Josef. Realpräsenz und Transsubstantiation im Konzil von Trient: eine historisch-kristische Analyse der Canones 1-4 der Sessio XIII. Europäsche Hochschulschriften, reihe 23, theologie, 37. 2 vols. Bern, 1975.Google Scholar
Yandell, Cathy. “ Corps and corpus: Montaigne's ‘Sur des vers de Virgile.‘” Rpt. in Montaigne: A Collection of Essays: A Five-Volume Anthology of Scholarly Articles, ed. Berven, Dikka, vol. 4: Language and Meaning: Word Study in Montaigne's Essays, 201-11. New York, 1995.Google Scholar