Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:47:09.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Fiery toungues:” Language, Liturgy, and the Paradox of the English Reformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Timothy Rosendale
Timothy Rosendale*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay examines the conflicted double logic of vernacularization in the English Reformation — specifically in the Book of Common Prayer, and more specifically in its Pentecost service — and argues that the transition to the vernacular in public worship simultaneously served the state's political ends and worked against those very ends by devolving religious authority to individuals. Understanding this dynamic, the author suggests, not only clarifies the role of language and text in the early modern constitution of nation and subject, but may also indicate a synthetic way out of a 400-year-old historiographical stalemate.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 54 , Issue 4-Part1 , Winter 2001 , pp. 1142 - 1164
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Book of Common Prayer. See Ratcliff, ed. Booty, John, ed. 1981. The Godly Kingdom of Tudor England. Wilton, CT.Google Scholar
Bradford, John. 1848. The Writings of John Bradford. Ed. Aubrey Townsend. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cranmer, Thomas. 1846. Miscellaneous Writings and Letters of Thomas Cranmer. Ed. J.E. Cox. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cressy, David. 1980. Literacy and the Social Order: Reading and Writing in Tudor and Stuart England. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1972. Proust and Signs. New York.Google Scholar
Dickens, A.G. 1989. The English Reformation. 2nd ed. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Duffy, Eamon. 1992. The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England, 1400-1580. New Haven.Google Scholar
Foxe, John. 1877. The Acts and Monuments. Ed. Josiah Pratt. 8 vols. London.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1980. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago.Google Scholar
Haigh, Christopher. 1987. The English Reformation Revised. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Haigh, Christopher. 1993. English Reformations: Religion, Politics, and Society Under the Tudors. Oxford.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. 1992. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago.Google Scholar
Hughes, Paul, and Larkin, James, eds. 1964-69. Tudor Royal Proclamations. 3 vols. New Haven.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott. 1997. “'The noyse of the new Bible': reform and reaction in Henrician England.” In Religion and Culture in Renaissance England, ed. Claire McEachern and Debora Shuger, 46-68. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jones, Richard E. 1953. The Triumph of the English Language. London.Google Scholar
King, John N. 1982. English Reformation Literature. Princeton.Google Scholar
MacCulloch, Diarmaid. 1996. Thomas Cranmer: A Life. New Haven.Google Scholar
McEachern, Claire. 1996. The Poetics of English Nationhood, 1590-1612. New York.Google Scholar
O'Day, Rosemary. 1986. The Debate on the English Reformation. London.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, E.C., ed. 1949. The First and Second Prayer Books of Edward VI. 1910. Reprint, London.Google Scholar
Ridley, Nicholas. 1841. Works. Ed. Henry Christmas. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Robinson, Hastings, ed. 1847. Original Letters Relative to the English Reformation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Russell, Thomas, ed. 1831. The Works of the English Reformers: William Tyndale and John Frith. 3 vols. London.Google Scholar
Scarisbrick, J.J. 1985. The Reformation and the English People. Oxford.Google Scholar
Spurgeon, D. 1967. An Edition of Three Tudor Dialogues. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert. 1987. “Discourse, ideology, and the crisis of authority.” REAL 5: 109–40.Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert. 1996. Authority and Representation in Early Modern Discourse. Baltimore.Google Scholar