Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:42:15.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equity and Ideas: Coke, Ellesmere, and James I*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Mark Fortier
Mark Fortier*
Affiliation:
University of Winnipeg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that in the English legal disputes of 1616, specifically the conflict between common law and equity, the principles and systems of ideas, at least as much as the characters, of Coke, Ellesmere, and James were determinative of the triumph of equity. The first part of the essay traces the legal reasoning in the key cases of the dispute. The second part traces James's political theory from his time in Scotland through his dealings with the English Parliament to his pronouncements on the law in his Star Chamber speech of 1616. The article argues that there is a consistent line of principle which can be traced from Scotland to the Star Chamber speech and that James's thought has consequently had its most lasting effect on the relation in Anglo-American jurisprudence between common law and equity.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , Winter 1998 , pp. 1255 - 1281
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I wish to thank Jim Phillips, Louis A. Knafla, J.P. Sommerville, Mia London, and Michael Meredith for their advice on this essay.

References

Aiken, Lucy. Memoirs of the Court of King James The First. 2d ed. Vol. 2. London, 1822.Google Scholar
Allen, J. W.. A History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century. London, 1957.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H.. “The Common Lawyers and the Chancery.” The Irish Jurist 4 (1969): 368-92.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H.. An Introduction to English Legal History. 3d ed. London, 1990.Google Scholar
Burgess, Glenn. The Politics of the Ancient Constitution: An Introduction to English Political Thought, 1603-1642. London, 1992.Google Scholar
Burgess, Glenn. Absolute Monarchy and the Stuart Constitution. New Haven, 1996.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, John. The Chamberlain Letters: A Selection of the Letters of John Chamberlain Concerning Life in England From 1597 to 1626. Elizabeth McClure Thomson, ed. New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Christianson, Paul. “Royal and Parliamentary Voices on the Ancient Constitution, c. 1604-1621.” In The Mental World of the Jacobean Court, ed. Linda Levy Peck, 71-95. Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward. La Vnzme Part des Reports de Sr. Edw. Coke. London, 1619.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward. The Third Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. London, 1644.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward. The Fourth Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England Concerning the Jurisdiction of Courts. London, 1644.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward. “The Case of the Master and Fellows of Magdalen Colledge of Cambridge.” The Reports of Sir Edward Coke, part 11, 1094-109. London, 1658.Google Scholar
Collectanea Juridica: Consisting of Tracts Relative to the Law and Constitution of England. Vol. 1. London, 1791.Google Scholar
“A Coppie of an advertisment to Sir Ed. Cooke, Anno 1617.” British Library Add. Ms 40838. 1-5.Google Scholar
Cowell, John. The Interpreter [1607]. Amsterdam, 1970.Google Scholar
Dawson, John P. “Coke and Ellesmere Disinterred: The Attack on Chancery in 1616.” Illinois Law Review 36 (1941): 127-52.Google Scholar
The Earl of Oxford's Case. The Third Part of Reports of Cases Taken and Adjudged in the Court of Chancery, 1-16. London, 1716.Google Scholar
Lord Ellesmere, Thomas. The Priviledges and Prerogatives of the High Court of Chancery. London, 1641.Google Scholar
Figgis, John Neville. The Divine Right of Kings. New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Samuel R. History of England From the Accession of James I to the Outbreak of the Civil War 1603-1642. Vol. 3. New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Harrison, Wilfrid. Conflict and Compromise: History of British Political Thought 1593-1900. New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. Change and Continuity in Seventeenth-Century England. Rev. ed. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Hirst, Derek. Authority and Conflict: England, 1603-1658. Cambridge, MA, 1986.Google Scholar
James, VI and I. Political Writings. Johann R Sommerville, ed. Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Jones, W.J.. The Elizabethan Court of Chancery. Oxford, 1967.Google Scholar
Jones, W.J.. Politics and the Bench: The Judges and the Origins of the English Civil War. London, 1971.Google Scholar
Jones, W.J.. “The Crown and the Courts in England 1603-1625.” In The Reign of James VI and I, ed. Alan G.R. Smith, 177-94. New York, 1973.Google Scholar
The King and Doctor Gouge. The Reports of Edward Bulstrode, vol. 3, 115-16. London, 1688.Google Scholar
The King's Order and Decree in Chancery. Reports or Causes in Chancery. George Cary, ed., 115-36. London, 1650.Google Scholar
Knafla, Louis A. Law and Politics in Jacobean England: The Tracts of Lord Chancellor Ellesmere. Cambridge, 1977.Google Scholar
Lee, Maurice Jr., Great Britain's Solomon: James VI and I in His Three Kingdoms. Urbana, 1990.Google Scholar
Levy Peck, Linda, ed. The Mental World of the Jacobean Court. Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
Martin, Julian. Francis Bacon, the State, and the Reform of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital. Vol. 1. New York, 1977.Google Scholar
Mcllwain, Charles, ed. The Political Works of James I. New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Plucknett, Theodore F.T. A Concise History of the Common Law. 5th ed. London, 1956.Google Scholar
Russell, Conrad. “Divine Rights in the Early Seventeenth Century.” In Public Duty and Private Conscience in Seventeenth-Century England, John Morrill, ed., 101-20. Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
Salmon, J.H.M. “Catholic resistance theory, Ultramontanism, and the royalist response, 1580-1620.” In Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700, ed. J.H. Burns, 219-53. Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Kevin. Politics and Ideas in Early Stuart England: Essays and Studies. London, 1989.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Kevin. ed. Culture and Politics V” Early Stuart England. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, 1994.Google Scholar
Smith, Alan G.R. “Constitutional Ideas and Parliamentary Developments in England 1603-1605.” In The Reign of James VI and I, ed. A.G.R. Smith, 160-76. New York, 1973.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P.. Politics and Ideology in England, 1603-1640. London, 1986.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P.. “James I and the Divine Right of Kings: English Politics and Continental Theory.” In The Mental World of the Jacobean Court, ed. Linda Levy Peck, 55–70. Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P.. “English and European Political Ideas in the Early Seventeenth Century: Revisionism and the Case of Absolutism.” Journal of British Studies 35 (1996): 168-94.Google Scholar
Wormald, B.H.G. Francis Bacon: History, Politics and Science, 1561-1626. Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar