Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:39:36.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social sin, social redemption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2019

KATHRYN POGIN*
Affiliation:
Yale Law School, 127 Wall St., New Haven, CT06511, USA Department of Philosophy, Northwestern University, Kresge 3512, 1880 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL60208, USA

Abstract

Eleonore Stump's Atonement marks a significant advance in atonement theory, especially in its nuanced approach to ethical and relational complexities, but tends to treat sin as social only insofar as one individual's sin can harm or shame another. I argue that that social sin requires social redemption and that exemplarism would provide a solution. Christ's pursuit of love and justice, in the midst of oppression, temptation, and struggle, offers a distinctive model of virtue, towards collective restoration of the world. While we cannot redeem ourselves, in calling us to effect justice and union with one another, God may also call us closer to Godself.

Type
Book Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelard, Peter (1956) ‘Exposition of the Epistle to the Romans (Excerpt from the Second Book)’, in Scholastic Miscellany: Anselm to Ockham Fairweather, Eugene Rathbone (ed.), Gerald Moffatt (tr.) (Philadelphia: Westminster John Knox Press), 276287.Google Scholar
Carlson Brown, Joanne & Parker, Rebecca (1989) ‘For God so loved the world?’, in Brown, Joanne Carlson & Bohn, Carole R. (eds) Christianity, Patriarchy, and Abuse (New York: Pilgrim Press), 130.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela (2011) ‘Interview with Bo Holmström’, in The Black Power Mixtape 1967–1975 (New York: Sundance Selects).Google Scholar
Finlayson, Lorna (2016) Introduction to Feminism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Miranda (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, Kristin E. (2010) ‘Social sin and immigration: good fences make bad neighors’, Theological Studies, 71, 410436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Charles W. (2017) ‘White ignorance’, in Black Rights/White Wrongs: The Critique of Racial Liberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 4971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panchuk, Michelle (2018) ‘The shattered self: a philosophical exploration of religious trauma’, Res Philosophica, 95, 505530.10.11612/resphil.1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogin, Kathryn (forthcoming) ‘Conceptualizing the atonement’, in Panchuk, Michelle & Rea, Michael (eds) Hinder Them Not: Centering Marginalized Voices in Analytic Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Segundo, Juan Luis (1974) Our Idea of God (New York: Orbis Books).Google Scholar
Sowle Cahill, Lisa (2007) ‘Moral theology: from evolutionary to revolutionary change’, in Keenan, James F. S.J. (ed.) Catholic Theological Ethics in the World Church: The Plenary Papers from the First Cross-Cultural Conference on Catholic Theological Ethics (New York: Continuum), 221227.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2018) Atonement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, Tim (2006) ‘White kind of card is race? The absurdity (and consistency) of white denial’, CounterPunch <http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/04/24/what-kind-of-card-is-race/> [last accessed 21 September 2019].+[last+accessed+21+September+2019].>Google Scholar