Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:55:01.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Blanshard's Ethics of Belief and Metaphysical Postulates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Winfred George Phillips
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Trinity University, 715 Stadium Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78212

Extract

In Brand Blanshard's major defence of reason in religion, Reason and Belief, he criticizes both Roman Catholics and Protestants for advocating contradictory theological doctrines and for believing beyond what the evidence supports. Claiming belief to be an ethical matter, with one morally responsible for one's religious beliefs, he holds that one is morally obligated in such metaphysical matters to believe only what the evidence warrants. Blanshard finds that religious beliefs typically fail to meet the standard of this ethics of belief, and thus his ethics appears inhospitable to religious belief.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Blanshard, Brand, Reason and Belief (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1974), pp. 3756.Google Scholar

2 Ibid. pp. 59–79.

3 Ibid. pp. 80–106.

4 Ibid. pp. 150–9.

5 Ibid. pp. 160–6.

6 Ibid. pp. 197–242, 265–77, 300–3.

7 Ibid. p. 401.

8 Ibid. p. 402.

9 Ibid. pp. 402–3.

10 Ibid. pp. 405–7.

11 Ibid. pp. 410–11, 427.

12 Ibid. pp. 432–3.

13 Ibid. p. 564.

14 Blanshard, Brand, The Nature of Thought (New York: Macmillan, 1940), 151–2.Google Scholar

15 Ibid. 167–74, 225.

16 Ibid. 1530–7.

17 Ibid. 1473.

18 Ibid. 1486–90.

19 Ibid. II 23–4.

20 Ibid. I 490–I.

21 Blanshard, , Reason and Belief, pp. 481–I;Google ScholarThe Nature of Thought, II 422–3.Google Scholar

22 Reason and Belief, pp. 482–3.Google Scholar

23 Blanshard, , Reason and Analysis (La Salle: Open Court, 1962), pp. 472–93.Google Scholar

24 The Nature of Thought, II 495–6;Google ScholarReason and Analysis, pp. 454–5Google Scholar

25 Reason and Analysis, pp. 465–71.Google Scholar

26 Ibid. p. 471.

27 The Nature of Thought, II, 476–95.Google Scholar

28 Schilpp, Paul Arthur, ed., The Philosophy of Brand Blanshard (La Salle: Open court, 1980), p. 592.Google Scholar

29 The Nature of Thought, I pp. 491–3.Google Scholar

30 Schilpp, , pp. 640–1, 833–4.Google Scholar

31 Reason and Belief, p. 503.Google Scholar

32 Ibid. pp. 504–5.

33 Ibid. pp. 505–6.

34 Schilpp, , pp. 512–14.Google Scholar

35 Ibid. p. 623.

36 Ibid. pp. 512–14.

37 Reason and Belief, pp. 508–10.Google Scholar

38 The Nature of Thought, II, 264–6.Google Scholar

39 Schilpp, , pp. 590–4.Google Scholar

40 Ibid. pp. 515–16.

41 Ibid. p. 594.

42 Ibid. p. 622.

43 Ibid. p. 621.

44 Ibid. pp. 623–4.

45 Ibid. pp. 620–21.

46 Reason and Belief, pp. 432–3.Google Scholar

47 Blanshard, , ‘Rationalism in ethics and religion’, in Bertocci, Peter A. (ed.), Mid-Twentieth Century American Philosophy (New York: Humanities Press, 1974), p. 25.Google Scholar

48 Schilpp, , p. 933.Google Scholar

49 The Nature of Thought, II, 269.Google Scholar

50 Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Beck, Lewis White (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956), pp. 129–30.Google Scholar

51 Ibid. p. 130.

52 Ibid., footnote on p. 149.

53 Ibid. pp. 4–5.