Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:25:41.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative political economy of capitalism, communism, slavery and colonialism in a nutshell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Yvo M.I. Dirickx
Affiliation:
Vlaamse Ekonomische Hogeschool and European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Brussels
Murat R. Sertel
Affiliation:
Boğagiçi Üniversitesi, Istanbul and IRES, Université Catholique de Louvain
Get access

Extract

In this paper we present a simple and unified model in which a large variety of politico-economic systems may be represented and static comparisons, positive and normative, between these systems may be carried out. In principle, the model encompasses an infinite variety of political economies, but we focus on twelve salient cases, namely, five types of capitalism, two types of communism, two types of slavery, and three types of colonialism.

In § 1 we introduce our approach, specify the basic data (preferences and technology) we will be working with, and assemble the « nutshell » within which we will remain from there on. In § 2 we describe a dozen political economies and determine, for each, both their associated « positive » economic quantities, such as employment and output and the distribution of income between workers, capitalists and colonialists, as well as corresponding magnitudes, such as « communal surplus » and class members' utility levels, which form the basis for our analysis in the subsequent sections. All these are displayed as Table I, and the outcomes of the dozen political economies considered are identified in Figure I, which depicts the « nutshell » assembled in § 1. Then § 3 derives the preferences of workers, capitalists and colonialists (displayed in Diagrams I, II and III, resp.) regarding the politico-economic systems in question, determining a class conflict which arises, identifying the Pareto-efficient systems for all the coalitions of classes. In § 4 we rank our dozen political economies in terms of the respective communal surplus they generate, from which it becomes plain in which « revolutions » (changes in politico-economic systems) the winners may compensate the losers. Finally, § 5 closes our present study by indicating how it might be fruitfully extended.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Dirickx, Y.M.I, and Sertel, M.R. (1978), « Class Conflict and Fairness in ‘Democratic Capitalism’ », Onderzoeksrapport 7513, Dept of Applied Economics, K.U.L., appearing also as IIM-Preprint I/75-26 (Revised Version, March 1976), forthcoming in Public Choice.Google Scholar
[2] Dirickx, Y.M.I, and Sertel, M.R. (1978), « Capitalism, Communism, and Labor Management under Constant Returns to Scale », EIASM Working Paper, 78–1.Google Scholar
[3] Dirickx, Y.M.I, and Sertel, M.R. (1979), « The Comparative Political Economy of Workers’ Management and Capitalism in a Nutshell », fortcoming as EIASM Working Paper.Google Scholar
[4] Domar, E. (1966), « The Soviet Collective Farm as a Producer Cooperative », American Economic Review, vol. 56, n° 4.Google Scholar
[5] Hansen, T. and Jaskold-Gabszewicz, J. (1972), « Collusion of Factor Owners and Distribution of Social Output », Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 4, n° 1.10.1016/0022-0531(72)90158-5Google Scholar
[6] Kleindorfer, P.R. and Sertel, M.R. (1976), « Equilibrium Analysis of Sharecropping », IIM Preprint Series I/76-33, appearing also as Working Paper 76-090293 U. Penn., Department of Decision Sciences.Google Scholar
[7] Kleindorfer, P.R. and Sertel, M.R. (1976), « Profit-Maximizing Design of Enterprises through Incentives », IIM Preprint Series I/76-75 forthcoming in Journal of Economic Theory.Google Scholar
[8] Steinherr, A. (1978), « The Labor-Managed Economics : a Survey of the Economics Literature », Annals of Public and Co-operative Economy, vol. 49, n° 2.Google Scholar
[9] Steinherr, A. (1977), « The Theory of Worker-Managed Economy and Firms », in Wilpert, B. (ed) « Participation in Industry and Internationalization of Economy », Kent State University Press, Ohio.Google Scholar
[10] Vanek, J. (1970), « The General Theory of Labor Managed Market Economies », Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
[11] Ward, B. (1958), « The Firm in Illyria : Market Syndicalism », American Economic Review, vol. 48, n° 3.Google Scholar