Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T16:38:36.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

European Policy Coordination: An Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Gilles Oudiz*
Affiliation:
I.N.S.E.E.
Get access

Extract

According to the European Community Commission the present level of unemployment in Europe should not only last but worsen in the foreseeable future (see CCE 1984). By 1988 the overall unemployment rate in Europe should reach 11,4% if the « optimistic » assumptions retained for the labor supply are to be realized.

These are of course average figures but on the whole they correctly reflect the extraordinary convergence of European deflationary policies. Given structural differences, which remain very limited when one compares them to the other Western economies, the European governments seem to have settled for the same macroeconomic strategies. Of course, they have chosen different timings. France, for example, has grown more than its partners in 1981-1982 but is now experiencing a prolonged recession. Whereas West Germany is doing better as far as GNP is concerned but grew very little in the early 80 s. On the whole however a back of the envelope calculation of « sacrifice ratios » for the leading European economies would yield quite similar results. All over Europe disinflation has been achieved at a high output cost and it is not clear that any country has really done better than its partners.

Type
PART TWO: European and Transatlantic Policy Coordination
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1985 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aoki, M. (1981), Dynamic Analysis of Open Economies, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Buiter, W. and Marston, R., eds. (1985), International Economic Policy Coordination, University Press.Google Scholar
Bergsten, CF. and Klein, L. (1983), The Economist, April 23–30.Google Scholar
Canzoneri, M. and Gray, J.A. (1983), Two Essays on Monetary Policy in an Interdependent World, International Finance Discussion paper, n° 219, February.Google Scholar
Canzoneri, M. and Henderson, D. (1985), Strategic Aspects of Macroeconomic Policy making in Interdependent Economies, chapitres I et III, unpublished, Federal Reserve Board, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Commission des Communautés Européennes, (1984), Rapport Economique Annuel 1984-1985» et « Bilan Economique Annuel 1984–1985, Economie Européenne, n° 22, November.Google Scholar
De Menil, G. (1984), Les sommets économiques: les politiques nationales à l’heurede l’interdépendance, IFRI Economica.Google Scholar
Dornbusch, R. (1976), Expectations And Exchange Rate Dynamics, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 84, N° 6.Google Scholar
Economic Planning Agency, (1984), The Insulation properties and transmission Mechanisms of Floating Exchange Rates Analysed by the EPA World Model, in Proceedings of the EPA International Symposium on Economic Interdependence Under Flexible Exchange Rates and the EPA Economic Model, February 1984, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Frankel, J. (1984), The Yen Dollar Agreement : Liberalizing Japanese Capital Markets, Institute for International Economics, Washington.Google Scholar
Giavazzi, F. and Giovannini, A. (1984), The Dollar and the European Monetary System, unpublished.Google Scholar
Hamada, K. (1974), Alternative Exchange Rate Sytems and the Interdependence of Monetary Policies, in National Monetary Policies and the International Financial System, Aliber, R., ed., Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hamada, K. (1976), A Strategic Analysis of Monetary Interdependence, Journal of Political Economy, 84.Google Scholar
Institute for International Economics, (1982), Promoting World Recovery: A Statement on Global Economic Strategy, Washington.Google Scholar
Laffargue, J.P. (1985), Une méthode d’évaluation interne des modèles multinationaux, Annales de l’INSEE, 57.Google Scholar
Layard, R. et alii (1984), Europe. The Case for Unsustainable Growth, Report of the CEPS Macroeconomic Policy Group, Center for European Policy Studies Papers.Google Scholar
Melitz, J. (1984), The Welfare Case for the European Monetary System, Working Paper INSEE-ENSAE.Google Scholar
Miller, M. and Salmon, M. (1983), Dynamic Games and the Time Inconsistency of Optimal Policies in Open Economies, Mimeo, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Muller, P. And Price, R.W. (1984), Structural Budget Deficits and Fiscal Policy Stance, OECD Working Paper, 15, July.Google Scholar
OECD, (1984), OECD Employment Outlook, Paris, September.Google Scholar
Oudiz, G. (1985), Stratégies économiques européennes; Coordination ou Confrontation?, Cahiers de l’Institut de Sciences Mathématiques et Economiques Appliquées, Forthcoming in 1985.Google Scholar
Oudiz, G. And Sachs, J. (1984), Macroeconomic Policy Coordination Among the Industrial Economies, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1984, 1.Google Scholar
Oudiz, G. And Sachs, J. (1985), International Policy Coordination in Dynamic Macroeconomic Models, in Buiter, W. and Marston, R., eds., International Economic Policy Coordination, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Padoa-Schioppa, T. (1985), Policy Coordination and the EMS Experience, in Buiter, W. and Martson, R., eds., International Economic Policy Coordination, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. And Bayne, N. (1984), Hanging Together: The Seven Power Summits, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roth, A. (1979), Axiomatic Models of Bargaining, Lectures in Economics and Mathematical Systems, n° 170, 1979, New York, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. (1984), The Age of Interdependence, MIT Press.Google Scholar