Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:08:58.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiological significance of marble used for construction of dwellings in Bangladesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2012

S. Ghose ,
Kh. Asaduzzaman  and
N. Zaman
S. Ghose*
Affiliation:
Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, GPO, Box 158, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Kh. Asaduzzaman
Affiliation:
Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, GPO, Box 158, Dhaka, Bangladesh
N. Zaman
Affiliation:
Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, GPO, Box 158, Dhaka, Bangladesh
*
* Present Address: Nuclear Safety & Radiation Control Division, 4 Kazi Nauru Islam Avenue, Ramna, Dhaka.
Get access

Abstract

The natural γ-radiation in samples of a variety of marbles imported into Bangladesh for use in building construction was measured, employing γ-ray spectrometry with a HPGe detector. From the measured γ-ray spectra, activity concentrations were determined for 226Ra (29.31 ± 2.06 to 46.99 ± 2.97 Bq.kg–1), 232Th (42.91 ± 2.53 to 62.92 ± 3.37 Bq.kg–1) and 40K (824.42 ± 15.42 to 1071.58 ± 20.14 Bq.kg–1). The measured activity concentrations for these natural radionuclides were compared with the reported data of other countries and with the world average activity of soil. The radium equivalent activity (Raeq), the hazard indices, the gamma activity concentration index, the indoor absorbed dose rate and the corresponding annual effective dose were estimated for the potential radiological hazard of the marble. The Raeq values of all marble samples are lower than the limit of 370 Bq.kg–1, equivalent to a dose of 1.5 mSv.y–1. The average values of the external and internal hazard indices are less than unity. The average indoor absorbed dose rate (121.25 nGy.h–1) is higher than the population-weighted average of 84 nGy.h–1, whereas the corresponding annual dose limit falls within an average value of 0.60 mSv, which is an order of magnitude below the limit specified for building materials in the literature. The present results indicate that using marble in building construction in Bangladesh does not pose any significant radiological hazard.

Keywords

Marblegamma spectrometryradioactivityradiation exposureBangladesh
Type
Research Article
Information
Radioprotection , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 105 - 118
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amrani, D., Tahtat, M. (2001) Natural radioactivity in Algerian building materials, Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 54, 687-689.Google ScholarPubMed
Aslam, M., Orfi, S.D., Khan, K., Jabbar, A. (2002) Radiological significance of Pakistani marble used for construction of dwellings, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 253 (3), 483-487.Google Scholar
Beretka, J., Mathew, P.J. (1985) Natural radioactivity of australian building materials, industrial waste and by-products, Health Phys. 48, 87-95.Google Scholar
EC (European Commission) (1999) Radiological protection principles concerning the natural radioactivity of building materials. Radiation protection Vol. 112. Directorate General Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection.
ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) (1990) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 60, Ann. ICRP 21 (1-3).
Iqbal, M., Tufail, M., Mirza, S.M. (2000) Measurement of natural radioactivity in marble found in Pakistan using a NaI (Tl) gamma-ray spectrometer, J. Environ. Radioact. 51, 255-265. Google Scholar
Khan, K., Khan, H.M. (2001) Natural gamma-emitting radionuclides in Pakistani portland cement, Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 54, 861-865.Google ScholarPubMed
Khan, K., Khan, H.M., Tufail, M., Ahmad, N. (1998) Radiometric analysis of Hazara phosphate rock and fertilizers, J. Environ. Radioact. 38, 77-83.Google Scholar
Kohshi, C., Takao, I., Hideo, S. (2001) Terrestrial gamma radiation in Koshi prefecture, Japan. Health Sci. 47 (4), 362-372. Google Scholar
Krisiuk E.M., Tarasov S.I., Shamov V.P., Shalak N.I., Lisa Chenko E.P., Gomelsky L.G. (1971) A Study on radioactivity in building materials. Leningrad: Research Institute for Radiation Hygiene.
Kumar, A., Kumar, M., Singh, B., Singh, S. (2003) Natural activities of 238U, 232Th and 40K in some Indian building materials, Radiat. Meas. 36, 465-469.Google Scholar
Kumar, V., Ramachandran, T.V., Prasad, R. (1999) Natural radioactivity of Indian building materials and by-products. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 51, 93-96.Google Scholar
Malanca, A., Pessina, V., Dallara, G. (1993) Radionuclide content of building materials and gamma-ray dose rates in dwellings of Rio Grande Do Norte, Brazil, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 48, 199-203.Google Scholar
Mustonen, R. (1984) Natural radioactivity and radon exhalation rate from Finish building materials, Health Phys. 46, 1195-1203.Google Scholar
Nageswara Rao, M.V. (1989) Natural radioactivity levels in some environmental materials from Rajasthan, Bull. Radiat. Prot. 12, 36-41.Google Scholar
NEA/OECD (1979) Nuclear Energy Agency. Exposure to radiation from natural radioactivity in building materials. Report by NEA Group of Experts (OECD, Nuclear Agency, Paris, France).
Nour Khalifa, Ahmed (2005) Measurement of natural radioactivity in building materials in Qena city, Upper Egypt, J. Environ. Radioact. 1, 91-99.Google Scholar
Quindos, L.S., Fernańdez, P.L., Ródenas, C., Gómez-Arozamena, J., Arteche, J. (2004) Conversion factors for external gamma dose derived from natural radionuclides in soils, J. Environ. Radioact. 71, 139-145. Google ScholarPubMed
Ramasamy, V., Ponnusamy, V., Hemalatha, J., Meenakshisundaram, V., Gajendiran, V. (2005) Evaluation of natural radioactivity and radiological hazards caused by different marbles of India, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 43, 815-820.Google Scholar
Rizzo, S., Brai, M., Basile, S., Bellia, S., Hauser, S. (2001) Gamma activity and geochemical features of building materials: estimation of gamma dose rate and indoor radon levels in Sicily, Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 55, 259-265. Google ScholarPubMed
Steger, F., Kunsch, B., Buchner, I. (1992) Radioactivity in building materials (a Standard in Austria to limit natural radioactivity in building materials), Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 45 (1/4), 721-722.Google Scholar
Stranden, E. (1976) Some aspects of radioactivity of building materials, Phys. 8, 167-177.Google Scholar
Turhan, Ş., Baykan, U.N., Şen, K. (2008) Measurement of the natural radioactivity in building materials used in Ankara and assessment of external doses, J. Radiol. Prot. 28, 83-91.Google ScholarPubMed
UNSCEAR (2000) Report to general assembly. Annex B: exposure from natural radiation sources.
UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) (1993) Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation.
UNSCEAR (1982) Ionizing radiation sources and biological effects. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation.
Walley El-Dine, N., El-Shershaby, A., Ahmed, F., Abdel-Haleem, A.S. (2001) Measurement of radioactivity and radon exhalation rate in different kinds of marbles and granites, Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 55, 853-860. Google Scholar