Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T04:21:05.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Transition Dating’ – a Heuristic Mathematical Approach to the Collation of Radiocarbon Dates from Stratified Sequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Ilan Sharon
Ilan Sharon*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel. Email: sharon@h2.hum.huji.ac.il.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A heuristic approach, nicknamed “transition dating,” was used to date sequences of early Iron Age contexts using a series of 14C determinations. The basic principles of transition dating are simple and intuitive: 1) attempt to date transitions between periods, phases, etc. rather than the phases themselves, and 2) the most plausible date for that transition is one that is later than the dates from contexts preceding it, and is still earlier than the dates succeeding it. Hypotheses regarding the actual date of each transition may be evaluated using an appropriate loss function. These loss functions can also be adjusted or weighted by the user to account differentially for the various factors causing the distortion or “fuzz” in the dates.

Type
II. Getting More from the Data
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 43 , Issue 2A: Proceedings of the 17th International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 1 of 3) , 2001 , pp. 345 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bronk Ramsey, C. 1994. Analysis of chronological information and radiocarbon calibration: the Program OxCal. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 41:11–6.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and the analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal Program. Radiocarbon 37(2): 425–30.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the Radiocarbon Calibration Program. Radiocarbon. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruins, HJ, van der Plicht, J. 2001. Radiocarbon challenges archaeo-historical time frameworks in the near east: the Early Bronze Age of Jericho in relation to Egypt. Radiocarbon. This volume.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, I. 1996. The archaeology of the United Monarchy: an alternative view. Levant 28:177–87.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, I. 1998. Bible archaeology or archaeology at Palestine in the Iron Age? A rejoinder. Levant 30:167–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilboa, A. 1999. The dynamics of Phoenician bichrome pottery–a view from Tel Dor. Bulletin of the American Society of Oriental Research 316:1–21.Google Scholar
Gilboa, A. 1999. The view from the East: Tel Dor and the earliest cypro-geometric exports to the Levant. In: Iacovou, M, Michaelides, D, editors. Cyprus: the historicity of the geometric horizon. Nicosia: University of Cyprus. p 119–37.Google Scholar
Gilboa, A, Sharon, I. 2001. Early Iron Age radiometric dates from Tel Dor: preliminary implications for phoenicia, and beyond. Radiocarbon. This volume.Google Scholar
Goodman, LA. 1984. The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered categories. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Handy, LK, editor. 1997. The age of Solomon-scholarship at the turn of the millennium. (Studies in the history and culture of the ancient Near East 11). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Manning, S, Weninger, B. 1992. A light in the dark: archaeological wriggle matching and the absolute chronology of the close of the Aegean Late Bronze Age. Antiquity 252:636–63.Google Scholar
Mazar, A. 1990. Archaeology of the land of the Bible (the Anchor Bible reference library). New York: Double-day.Google Scholar
Mazar, A, Carmi, I. 2001. Radiocarbon dates from Iron Age strata at Tel Beth Shean and Tel Rehov. Radiocarbon. This volume.Google Scholar
Saragusti, I, Sharon, I. 1995. Collation of absolute dates for the Persian-Roman phases in areas A-C. In: Stern, E et al. Excavations at Tel Dor, final report. Volume Ia: areas A and C, introduction and Stratigraphy. Qedem Reports, 1. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J. 1993. The Groningen radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 35(1):231–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar