Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-30T02:53:49.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiocarbon Variations in Consecutive Single Rings of A 4000-Year-Old Pine from the British Isles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

A D Hewson
Affiliation:
Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire
Richard Burleigh
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory, The British Museum, London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At the Ninth International Radiocarbon Conference a paper was presented concerning possible short-term 14C variations in 4000-year-old red deer antlers (Cervus elaphus) found in Neolithic flint mines in Norfolk, England (Burleigh and Hewson, 1980). It was argued, on archaeologic grounds, that the true age of the samples varied by a few years at most. Their radiocarbon ages, however, varied by a considerably greater amount than could be explained by the errors in the measurements. Duplication of the measurements confirmed this unexpected variation.

Farmer and Baxter (1972) claimed a significant correlation of atmospheric 14C levels in the northern hemisphere with sunspot number based on radiocarbon assay of single tree rings for the period 1829 to 1865. In contrast, Stuiver (1978) stated that a series of single-year Douglas Fir measurements did not show a statistically significant periodicity.

This paper reports measurements made on a series of single-year dendrochronologic samples of approximately the same age as the red deer antlers, which have been carried out at the British Museum Research Laboratory. The results show that the variation in 14C between rings is not statistically significant; some other explanation must be sought for the anomalous antler measurements.

Type
Natural 14C Variations
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Burleigh, Richard, 1972, Liquid scintillation counting of low levels of carbon-14 for radiocarbon dating, in Crook, M A, Johnson, P, and Scales, B, eds, Liquid scintillation counting, volume 2: London, Heyden & Sons, p 139.Google Scholar
Burleigh, Richard 1974, A bomb method for rapid combustion of samples, in Crook, M A and Johnson, P, eds, Liquid scintillation counting, v 3: London, Heyden & Sons p 295.Google Scholar
Burleigh, Richard and Hewson, A D, 1979, Archaeological evidence for short-term natural 14C variations, in Berger, Rainer and Suess, H E, eds, Radiocarbon dating, Internatl conf on radiocarbon dating, 9th, Proc: Berkeley/Los Angeles, Univ California Press, p 591600.Google Scholar
Cain, W F and Suess, H E, 1976, Carbon 14 in tree rings: Jour Geophys Research v 81 p 36883694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, J G and Baxter, M S, 1972, Short-term trends in national radiocarbon, in Rafter, T A and Grant-Taylor, T, eds, Internatl conf on radiocarbon dating, 8th, Proc: Lower Hutt, New Zealand, Royal Soc New Zealand, p A74.Google Scholar
Fraser, I, Polach, H A, Temple, R B, and Gillespie, R, 1974, Purity of benzene synthesized for liquid scintillation 14C-dating, in Stanley, P E and Scoggins, B A, eds, Liquid scintillation counting recent developments: New York, Academic Press p 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewson, A D and Hall, J A, 1980, Further developments in on-line computing and radiocarbon dating at the British Museum, in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 2, p 455460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, H S, 1972, Tranfers of carbon from solvents to samples, in Rafter, T A and Grant-Taylor, T, eds, Internatl conf on radiocarbon dating, 8th, Proc: Lower Hutt, New Zealand, Royal Soc New Zealand, p B63.Google Scholar
Long, Austin, Arnold, L D, Damon, P E, Ferguson, C W, Lerman, J C, and Wilson, A T, 1979, Radial translocation of carbon in Bristlecone Pine, in Berger, Rainer and Suess, H E, eds, Radiocarbon dating, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 9th, Proc: Berkeley/Los Angeles, Univ California Press, p 532537.Google Scholar
Noakes, J E, Kim, S M, and Stipp, J J, 1965, Chemical and counting advances in liquid scintillation age dating, in Chatters, R M and Olson, E A, eds, Internatl conf on radiocarbon and tritium dating, 6th, Proc: Pullman, Washington, Washington State Univ, p 68.Google Scholar
Smith, A G, Pearson, G W, and Pilcher, J R, 1973, Belfast radiocarbon dates V: Radiocarbon, v 15, p 212228.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G W and Cochran, W C, 1967, Statistical methods: Iowa State Univ Press, 539 p.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze, 1978, Radiocarbon timescale tested against magnetic and other dating methods: Nature, v 273, p 271274.Google Scholar
Tamers, M A, 1960, Carbon-14 dating with the liquid scintillation counter: Total synthesis of the benzene solvent: Science, v 132, p 668669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamers, M A 1965, Routine carbon-14 dating using liquid scintillation techniques, in Chatters, R M and Olson, E A, eds, Internatl conf on radiocarbon and tritium dating, 6th, Proc: Pullman, Washington, Washington State Univ, p 53.Google Scholar
Tans, P P, de Jong, A F M, and Mook, W G, 1978, Chemical pretreatment and radial flow of 14C in tree rings: Nature, v 271, p 234235.Google Scholar