Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:39:35.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Methodological Issues in the 14C Dating of Rock Paintings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

R. E. M. Hedges
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom
Christopher Bronk Ramsey
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom
G. J. Van Klinken
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom
P. B. Pettitt
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom
Christina Nielsen-Marsh
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom
Alberto Etchegoyen
Affiliation:
Laboratorio TANDAR, Departamento de Física, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Avda. del Libertador 8259, 1429 Buenos Aires, Argentina
J.O. Fernandez Niello
Affiliation:
Laboratorio TANDAR, Departamento de Física, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Avda. del Libertador 8259, 1429 Buenos Aires, Argentina
M. T. Boschin
Affiliation:
Facultad de Filosofia y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Moreno 350 (1091) Buenos Aires, Argentina
A. M. Llamazares
Affiliation:
Facultad de Filosofia y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Moreno 350 (1091) Buenos Aires, Argentina
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Chemical and isotopic analyses have been made of pigment samples from two separate rock art sites in Argentina. The purpose of the study has been to establish the feasibility of extracting carbonaceous material from the samples which will permit reliable radiocarbon dates for the time of painting. The two sites, Catamarca and Rio Negro, present quite different problems. Most of the paper is concerned with Catamarca, and here we have shown that the paint pigments contain very little or no organic binder; but they do contain calcium oxalate derived from local cacti, and calcium carbonate derived probably from local plant ash. We describe a method to purify carbon extracted from the calcium oxalate, and present the dates obtained on both components. We show that, though rare, natural deposits containing both calcium oxalate and calcite do occur, but that they are very distinct in both 13C and 14C compositions; and we argue that they are very unlikely to contaminate the pigments to such an extent that the 14C dates are altered. For the Rio Negro site we show that the ground for the paint pigments contains carbon derived from fires burnt inside the cave, and discuss how analytical methods provide information to develop a strategy for extracting material, from both ground and pigment, for more reliable dating.

Type
Part 1: Methods
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Boschin, M. T. 1988 Arqueología del “Area Pilcaniyeu”, Sudoeste de Río Negro, Argentina. Cuadernos (Institute Nacional de Antropología, Buenos Aires) 11:99–119.Google Scholar
de la Fuente, N. 1979 Arte rupestre en la región de Ancasti, provincia de Catamarca. In Jornadas de Arqueología del NOA. Antiquitas (Buenos Aires) 2: 408418.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R. 1990 On the use of oxidation for AMS sample pretreatment. Nuclear Instruments and Methods B52: 345347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, R. 1997 On human blood, rock art and calcium oxalate. Antiquity 71: 430437.Google Scholar
Hedges, R., Humm, M., Foreman, J., van Klinken, G. and Bronk, C. 1992 Developments in sample combustion to CO2, and in the CO2 ion source system. In Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 14th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 34(3): 306311.Google Scholar
Lange, O. L. and Zeigler, H. 1986 Different limiting processes of photosynthesis in lichens. In Marcelle, R., Clijster, H. and van Poucke, M., eds., Biological Control of Photosynthesis. Dordrecht, Netherlands: 147161.Google Scholar
Llamazares, A. M. 1996 (ms.) Research report presented to CONICET (National Council for Scientific and Technological Research). Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Loy, T., Jones, R., Nelson, D., Meehan, B., Vogel, J., Southon, J. and Cosgrove, R. 1990 Accelerator radiocarbon dating of human blood proteins in pigments from late pleistocene art sites in Australia. Antiquity 64: 110116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchetti, B. and Prudkin, N. 1983 Atlas Total de la República Argentina. Centro Editor de América Latina, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
McDonald, J., Officer, K., Jull, A. J. T., Donahue, D., Head, J. and Ford, B. 1990 Investigating 14C AMS: Dating prehistoric rock art in the Sydney sandstone basin, Australia. Rock Art Research 7: 8392.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. E. 1993 Second thoughts on a rock art date. Antiquity 67: 893895.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. E., Chaloupka, G., Chippindale, C., Alderson, M. S. and Southon, J. R. 1995 Radiocarbon dates from beeswax figures in the prehistoric rock art of northern Australia. Archaeometry 37 (1): 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russ, J., Hyman, M., Shafer, H. and Rowe, M. 1990 Radiocarbon dating of prehistoric rock paintings by selective oxidation of organic matter. Nature 348: 710711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russ, J., Palma, R. L., Loyd, D. H., Boutton, T. W. and Coy, M. A. 1996 Origin of the whewellite-rich rock crust in the lower Pecos region of Southwest Texas and its significance to paleoclimate reconstructions. Quaternary Research 46: 2736.Google Scholar
Segura, A. B. 1988 El arte rupestre del Este de Catamarca. Las pictografías de La Candelaria, Departamento Ancastiy provincia de Catamarca. Universidad Nacional de Catamarca. Facultad de Humanidades. Catamarca, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Valladas, H., Cachier, H., Maurice, P., Bernaldo de Quiros, F., Clottes, J., Valdes, V. C., Uzquiano, P. and Arnold, M. 1992 Direct radiocarbon dates of prehistoric paintings at the Altamira. Nature 357: 6870.Google Scholar
Watchman, A. 1990 A summary of occurrences of oxalate-rich crusts in Australia. Rock Art Research 7: 4450.Google Scholar
Watchman, A. and Cambell, J. 1996 Microstratigraphic analysis of laminated oxalate crusts in northern Australia. In 2nd International Symposium on the oxalate films in the conservation of works of art, Milan 1996: 409422.Google Scholar
Wendt, W. E. 1976 ‘Art Mobilier’ from the Apollo 11 Cave South West Africa. South African Archaeological Bulletin 31: 511.Google Scholar