Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T17:03:32.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-Sensitivity Radiocarbon Dating in the 50,000 to 70,000 bp Range without Isotopic Enrichment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Austin Long
Affiliation:
Environmental Radioisotope Center, Department of Geosciences, The University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA
Robert M. Kalin
Affiliation:
Environmental Radioisotope Center, Department of Geosciences, The University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Calculations show the possibility of detecting 14C remaining after 10 or 11 decay half-lives in natural materials, such as wood, using commercially available liquid scintillation (LS) detectors. Assuming in-situ14C production has contributed insignificantly to the measured 14C, one can calculate finite ages approaching 70 ka. In practice, defensible finite age determinations involve careful considerations of several critical elements in the procedure. These critical elements are: 1) the integrity of the sample itself, in terms of younger contaminants and of in situ-produced 14C; 2) the availability of “dead” background material; 3) chemical blank in laboratory preparation of, in this case, benzene; and 4) stability of background and efficiency of the LS counting system. High-sensitivity 14C dating reveals a low level of memory effect 14C in benzene synthesized in the laboratory from anthracite or marble. This level of 14C activity is equivalent to that found in 53 ka old wood, and thus, is not distinguishable from petrochemical benzene used in routine dating. If careful control of laboratory conditions can maintain this 14C blank constant, reproducible dating beyond 53 ka would be possible. Although we have not completed a systematic analysis of the origins of memory effect, lithium reactors used in acetylene production and organic solvents in wood pretreatment are likely sources.

Type
I. Sample Preparation and Measurement Techniques
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Anderson, E. C., Arnold, J. R. and Libby, W. F. 1951 Measurement of low level radiocarbon. The Review of Scientific Instruments 22: 225230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, J. R. and Libby, W. F. 1951 Radiocarbon dates. Science 113: 111120.Google Scholar
Grootes, P. M. 1977 Thermal Diffusion Isotopic Enrichment and Radiocarbon Dating Beyond 50,000 Years bp. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Groningen: 221 p.Google Scholar
Grootes, P. M. 1978 Carbon-14 time scale extended: Comparison of chronologies. Science 200: 1115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grootes, P. M., Mook, W. G., Vogel, J. C., de Vries, A. E., Haring, A. and Kistemaker, J. 1975 Enrichment of radiocarbon for radiocarbon dating of samples up to 75,000 years. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung. 30A: 114.Google Scholar
Grootes, P. M., Stuiver, M., Farwell, G. W., Schaad, T. P. and Schmidt, F. H. 1980 Enrichment of 14C and sample preparation for beta and ion counting. Radiocarbon 22(2): 487500.Google Scholar
Gupta, S. K. and Polach, H. A. 1985 Radiocarbon Dating Practices at ANU. Radiocarbon Laboratory, Research School of Pacific Studies, ANU, Canberra: 176 p.Google Scholar
Kalin, R. M. and Long, A. 1989 Radiocarbon dating with the Quantulus in an underground counting laboratory: performance and background sources. In Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 13th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 31(3): 359367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. and Kalin, R. M. 1992 Radiocarbon dating in the 50,000 to 65,000 year range without isotopic enrichment. In Povinec, P., ed., Proceedings of the 14th Europhysics Conference on Nuclear Physics: Rare Nuclear Processes. Singapore, World Scientific: 256263.Google Scholar
McCormac, F. G. 1992 Liquid scintillation counter characterization, optimization and benzene purity correction. Radiocarbon 34(1): 3745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noakes, J. E., Isbell, A. F., Stipp, J. J. and Hood, D. W. 1963 Benzene synthesis by low temperature catalysis for radiocarbon dating. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 27(7): 797804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oeschger, H. and Wahlen, M. 1975 Low level counting techniques. Annual Review of Nuclear Science 25: 423463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Péwé, T. L. 1975 Quaternary stratigraphic nomenclature in central Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 862 : 32 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polach, H. A. 1987 Evaluation and status of liquid scintillation counting for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 29(1): 111.Google Scholar
Povinec, P. 1992 14C gas counting: Is there still a future? In Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 14th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon, this issue.Google Scholar
Radnell, C. J. and Muller, A. B. 1980 Memory effects in the production of benzene for radiocarbon dating. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 10th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 22(2): 479486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Polach, H. A. 1977 Discussion: Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3): 355363.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., Robinson, S. W. and Yang, I. C. 1979 14C dating to 60,000 years BP with proportional counters. In Berger, R. and Suess, H. E., eds., Radiocarbon Dating. Proceedings of the 9th International 14C Conference. Los Angeles, University of California Press: 202215.Google Scholar
Westgate, J. A. 1988 Isothermal plateau fission-track age of the late Pleistocene Old Crow tephra, Alaska. Geophysical Research Letters 15: 376379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar