Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T09:18:45.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dating of Late Pleistocene Tree-Ring Series from Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

J van der Plicht*
Affiliation:
Center for Isotope Research, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands. Also: Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
M Imamura
Affiliation:
National Museum of Japanese History, Sakura, Japan
M Sakamoto
Affiliation:
National Museum of Japanese History, Sakura, Japan
*
Corresponding author. Email: J.van.der.Plicht@rug.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have radiocarbon dated series of tree rings from 2 fossil trees (named ND-113 and the Fuji tree) buried in fossil volcanic avalanche deposits in Japan. They are dendrochronologically floating, dating beyond the tree-ring part of the 14C calibration curve. The trees show about 350 and 400 annual rings, respectively, which are dated in intervals of 2 to 10 yr. Both sequences are wiggle-matched to the calibration curve IntCal09. This resulted in an age range of 16,534–16,204 cal BP for ND-113, and 23,678–23,290 cal BP for the Fuji tree.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Aerts-Bijma, AT, van der Plicht, J, Meijer, HAJ. 2001. Automatic AMS sample combustion and CO2 collection. Radiocarbon 43(2A):293–8.Google Scholar
Baillie, MGL. 1982. Tree-Ring Dating and Archaeology. London: Croom-Helm.Google Scholar
Balter, M. 2006. Radiocarbon dating's final frontier. Science 313(5793):1560–3.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.Google Scholar
Fukuhara, T, Wada, H. 1997. Radiocarbon age determination at Shizuoka University (1). Geoscience Reports of Shizuoka University 24:1526. In Japanese with English abstract.Google Scholar
Haesaerts, P, Chekha, VP, Damblon, F, Drozdov, NI, Orlova, LA, van der Plicht, J. 2005. The loess-palaeosol succession of Kurtak (Yenisei basin, Siberia): a reference record for the Karga Stage (MIS3). Quaternaire 16(1):324.Google Scholar
Hayakawa, Y. 1985. Pyroclastic geology of Towada Volcano. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute University of Tokyo 60:507–92.Google Scholar
Horiuchi, K, Sonoda, S, Matsuzaki, H, Ohyama, M. 2007. Radiocarbon analysis of tree rings from a 15.5–cal kyr BP pyroclastically buried forest: a pilot study. Radiocarbon 49(2):1123–32.Google Scholar
Kromer, B, Friedrich, M, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, F, Remmele, S, Schaub, M, Talamo, S. 2004. Late Glacial 14C ages from a floating, 1382–ring pine chronology. Radiocarbon 46(3):1203–9.Google Scholar
Mook, WG, Streurman, HJ. 1983. Physical and chemical aspects of radiocarbon dating. In: First Symposium on 14C and Archaeology, Groningen. PACT 8:3155.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.Google Scholar
Sato, T, Sakurai, H, Suzuki, K, Takahashi, Y. 2010. 14C age measurements of single-year tree rings of old wood samples 22,000 14C years BP. Radiocarbon 52(3):901–6.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Kra, R, editors. 1986. Calibration issue. Radiocarbon 28(2B):8051030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suess, HE. 1970. The three causes of the secular C-14 fluctuations, their amplitudes and time constants. In: Olsson, IU, editor. Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology. Nobel Symposium 12th Proceedings. New York: John Wiley and Sons, p 595606.Google Scholar
Turney, CSM, Fifield, LK, Palmer, JG, Hogg, AG, Baillie, MGL, Galbraith, R, Ogden, J, Lorrey, A, Tims, SG. 2007. Towards a radiocarbon calibration for Oxygen Isotope Stage 3 using New Zealand kauri (Agathis Australia) . Radiocarbon 49(2):447–57.Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J, Wijma, S, Aerts, AT, Pertuisot, MH, Meijer, HAJ. 2000. Status report: the Groningen AMS facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):5865.Google Scholar