Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T03:27:56.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absolute Dating of Recent Sediments in the Cyclone-influenced Shelf Area Off Bangladesh: Comparison of Gamma Spectrometric (137Cs, 210Pb, 228Ra), Radiocarbon, and 32Si Ages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Axel Suckow*
Affiliation:
Institute for Joint Geoscientific Research (GGA), S3: Geochronology and Isotope Hydrology, Stilleweg 2, Hannover, Germany
Uwe Morgenstern
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences (GNS), Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Herrmann-Rudolf Kudrass
Affiliation:
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Germany
*
Corresponding author. Email: Axel.Suckow@gga-hannover.de.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A geochronological survey of the Bengal shelf area involved results from more than 20 sediment cores dated using gamma spectrometry and the nuclides 137Cs, 228Ra, 226Ra, and 210Pb. In some cores, which contained older sediments, 32Si and 14C were determined to examine the possibility to extrapolate the obtained chronologies to century and millennial scale. Geochronological work in this region is faced with problems of cyclone-induced sediment reworking, grain-size effects on fallout nuclides, scarcity of carbonates, unknown 14C reservoir effect and sedimentation rates that are too high to obtain sediment cores long enough to establish a chronology. Despite these problems, comparison between the results of the different dating methods provided the most reliable sediment balance to date for the submarine delta of the Ganges-Brahmaputra river system and indicated that on a time scale of several centuries at least 35% of the annual sediment load is deposited.

Type
II. Our ‘Wet’ Environment
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Allison, MA. 1998. Historical changes in the Ganges-Brahmaputra delta front. Journal of Coastal Research 14:480–90.Google Scholar
Allison, MA, Kuehl, SA, Martin, TC, Hassan, A. 1998. Importance of floodplain sedimentation for river sediment budgets and terrigeneous input to the oceans: insights for the Brahmaputra-Jamuna river. Geology 26:175–8.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleby, PG, Oldfield, F. 1992. Application of lead-210 to sedimentation studies. In: Ivanovich, M, Harmon, RS, editors. Uranium series disequilibrium. Applications to Earth, marine and environmental sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p 731–79.Google Scholar
Barua, DK, Kuehl, SA, Miller, RL, Moore, WS. 1979. Suspended sediment distribution and residual transport in the coastal ocean off the Ganges-Brahmaputra river mouth. Marine Geology 120:4161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barua, DK, Kana, TW. 1995. Deep water wave hindcasting, wave refraction modelling and wind and wave induced motions in the east Ganges-Brahmaputra delta coast. Journal of Coastal Research 11(3):834–48.Google Scholar
Booth, JS, Winters, WJ. 1991. Wave processes and geologic responses on the floor of the Yellow Sea. In: From shoreline to abyss. Society for Sedimentary Geology. Special publication. p 123–32.Google Scholar
DeMaster, DJ. 1980. The half-life of 32Si determined from a varved Gulf of California sediment core. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 48:209–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukat, DA, Kuehl, SA. 1995. Non-steady-state 210Pb flux and the use of 228Ra/226Ra as a geochronometer on the Amazon continental shelf. Marine Geology 125:329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodbred, SL, Kuehl, SA. 1998. Floodplain processes in the Bengal Basin and the storage of Ganges-Brahmaputra river sediment: an accretion study using 137Cs and 210Pb geochronology. Sedimentary Geology 21:239–58.Google Scholar
Goodbred, SL, Kuehl, SA. 1999. Holocene and modern sediment budgets for Ganges-Brahmaputra river: evidence for highstand dispersal to floodplain, shelf and deep-sea depocenters. Geology 27:559–62.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelen, K, Geyh, MA. 1986. A low-cost miniature counter system for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 28(2A):578–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudrass, HR, Michels, KH, Wiedicke, M, Suckow, A. 1998. Cyclones and tides as feeders of a submarine canyon off Bangladesh. Geology 26:715–18.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehl, SA, Harm, TM, Moore, WS. 1989. Shelf sedimentation off the Ganges-Brahmaputra river system: evidence for sediment bypassing to the Bengal fan. Geology 17:1132–5.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehl, SA, Levy, BM, Moore, WS, Allison, MA. 1997. Subaqueous delta of the Ganges-Brahmaputra river system. Marine Geology 144:8196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, KH, Kudrass, HR, Hübscher, C, Suckow, A, Wiedicke, M. 1998. The submarine delta of the Ganges-Brahmaputra: cyclone-dominated sedimentation patterns. Marine Geology 149:133–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, K, Suckow, A, Breitzke, M, Kudrass, HR, Kottke, B. 2001. The role of a shelf canyon as a temporary depocenter between river mouth and deep-sea fan. Deep-Sea Research. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Milliman, JD, Meade, RH. 1983. World-wide delivery of river sediment to the oceans. Journal of Geology 91:121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, WS. 1997. High fluxes of radium and barium from the mouth of the Ganges-Brahmaputra river during low river discharge suggest a large groundwater source. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 150:141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, U, Taylor, CB, Parrat, Y, Gäggeler, HW, Eichler, B. 1996. 32Si in precipitation: evaluation of temporal and spatial variation and as dating tool for glacial ice. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 144:289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, U, Geyh, MA, Kudrass, HR, Ditchburn, RG, Graham, IJ. 2001. 32Si dating of marine sediments: application to the shelf of Bangladesh. Radiocarbon. This issue.Google Scholar
Segall, MP, Kuehl, SA. 1992. Sedimentary processes on the Bengal shelf as revealed by clay-size mineralogy. Continental Shelf Research 12:517–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segall, MP, Kuehl, SA. 1994. Sedimentary structures on the Bengal shelf: a multi-scale approach to sedimentary fabric interpretation. Sedimentary Geology 93:165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suckow, A, Dumke, I. 2001. A database system for geochemical, isotope hydrological and geochronological laboratories. Radiocarbon. This issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, ME, Wiedicke, MH, Kudrass, HR, Hübscher, C, Erlenkeuser, H. 1997. Active growth of the Bengal Fan during sea-level rise and highstand. Geology 25:315–18.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar