Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T14:16:56.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Who's the Man and Who's the Woman?’ Same-sex Couples in Queensland ‘Doing’ Gender and Domestic Labour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Get access

Extract

This article reports an exploratory study that investigated domestic labour in same-sex households, to the best of my knowledge the first in Australia to do so. In-depth semi-structured interviews with 12 couples in Southeast Queensland reveal that these lesbians and gay men do not take on heteronormative gender roles when doing domestic labour, and that their practices reflect a variety of styles of sharing, with no pattern emerging as clearly dominant. Theoretical frameworks conceptualising gender as performative, and queer theory's figuring of identity as a constellation of multiple and unstable positions, suggest how the performance of gender may vary in different domains of social and cultural space, and in relation to other actors in those spaces. I have conceptualised this process by means of an analogy with the modulation of sound such that each person adjusts the balance between treble (conventionally feminine behaviours, attitudes and attributes) and bass (conventionally masculine behaviours and attributes). Rather than being ‘the man’ or ‘the woman’, or even displaying a single form of gay masculinity or lesbian femininity, lesbians and gay men can be seen to perform varying degrees of masculinity and femininity in the private space of the home, and in relation to their intimate partners, by the way they engage with domestic labour. Finally, I reflect on how the socio-geographical specificities of being situated in Southeast Queensland may have impacted on this research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babbie, E., 2001, The Practice of Social Research, 9th edn, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
Baxter, J., 1993, Work at Home: The Domestic Division of Labour, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia.Google Scholar
Berk, S.F. 1985, The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlant, L., and Warner, M., 1998, ‘Sex in Public’, Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 547–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biernacki, P., and Waldorf, D., 1981, ‘Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling’, Sociological Methods and Research 10(2): 141–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouma, G.D. 2000, The Research Process, 4th edn, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Burnley, I., and Murphy, P., 2003, Sea Change: Movement from Metropolitan to Arcadian Australia, UNSW Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Carrington, C., 1999, No Place Like Home: Relationships and Family Life Among Lesbians and Gay Men, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, R.W. 1987, Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Giddings, L.A. 1998, ‘Political Economy and the Construction of Gender: The Example of Housework Within Same-Sex Households’, Feminist Economics 4(2), 97106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddings, L.A., 2003, ‘But … Who Mows the Lawn? The Division of Labor in Same-sex Households’, in Moe, K.S. (ed.), Women, Family and Work: Writings on the Economics of Gender, Blackwell, Malden, MA, 85–102.Google Scholar
Goodnow, J., and Bowes, J., 1994, Men, Women and Household Work, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Gorman-Murray, A., 2007, in press, ‘Rethinking Queer Migration through the Body’, Social and Cultural Geography 8(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S., and Scott, S., 2002, ‘Introduction: The Gendering of Sociology’, in Jackson, S. and Scott, S. (eds), Gender, A Sociological Reader, Routledge, London, 1–26.Google Scholar
Kentlyn, S., 2006, ‘Adjusting Bass and Treble: The Continuously Modulated Performance of Gender’, QUT Centre for Social Change Research Conference, Brisbane, 27 October, www.socialchange.qut.edu.au/conferences/socialchange/docs/conf_papers2006/Kentlyn_FIN.pdf.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, C., and Wilkinson, S., 1995, ‘Transitions from Heterosexuality to Lesbianism: The Discursive Production of Lesbian Identities’, Developmental Psychology 31(1), 95104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., and Alexander, L., (1995) In-Depth Interviewing, 2nd edn, Longman, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Natalier, K., 2003, ‘I'm Not his Wife’: Doing Gender in Share Households, PhD thesis, University of Queensland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oerton, S. 1997, ‘“Queer Housewives?” Some Problems in Theorising the Division of Domestic Labour in Lesbian and Gay Households’, Women's Studies International Forum 20(3), 421–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oerton, S. 1998, ‘Reclaiming the “Housewife”? Lesbians and Household Work’, Journal of Lesbian Studies 2(4), 6983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiers, G.A., 1999, From This Day Forward: Commitment, Marriage, and Family in Lesbian and Gay Relationships, St Martin's Griffin, New York.Google Scholar
Walby, S., 1986, ‘Gender, Class and Stratification: Towards a New Approach’, in Crompton, R. Mann, M. (eds), Gender and Stratification, Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
West, C. and Zimmerman, D. 1987, ‘Doing Gender’, Gender and Society 1(2), 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, K., 1995, ‘Get Thee to a Big City: Sexual Imaginary and the Great Gay Migration’, GLQ 2, 253–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, K. 2004, ‘Fieldwork in Lesbian and Gay Communities’, in Hesse-Biber, S., Nagy, S. and Yaiser, M.L. (eds), Feminist Perspectives on Social Research, Oxford University Press, New York, 198205.Google Scholar
Williams, C.L., and Stein, A., 2002, ‘Introduction’, in Williams, C.L. and Stein, A. (eds), Sexuality and Gender, Blackwell, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Willig, C., 1999, Applied Discourse Analysis: Social and Psychological Interventions, Open University Press, Buckingham.Google Scholar