Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T23:45:00.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovation in Queensland Firms: Implications for the Smart State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Jay Weerawardena
Get access

Abstract

The challenges in the business environment are forcing Australian firms to be innovative in all their efforts to serve customers. Reflecting this need there have been several innovation policy statements both at Federal and State government level aimed at encouraging innovation in Australian industry. In particular, the innovation policy statement launched by the Queensland government in the year 2000 primarily intends building a Smart State through innovation. During the last few decades the Australian government policy on innovation has emphasized support for industry R&D. However industry stakeholders demand a more firm-focused policy of innovation. Government efforts in this direction have been hindered by a lack of a consistent body of knowledge on innovation at the firm level. In particular the Australian literature focusing on firm level antecedents of innovation is limited and fragmented. This study examines the role of learning capabilities in innovation and competitive advantage. Based on a survey of manufacturing firms in Queensland the study finds that both technological and non-technological innovations lead to competitive advantage. The findings contribute to the theory competitive advantage and firm level antecedents of innovation. Implications for firm level innovation strategies and behaviour are discussed. In addition, the findings have important implications for Queensland government's current initiatives to build a Smart State through innovation.

Type
Special Theme: Queensland: The Smart State
Information
Queensland Review , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 2003 , pp. 89 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics), 1995, Small Business in Australia, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. S., and Overton, T. S., 1977, ‘Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys’, Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (August): 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Manufacturing Council 1995, The innovation cycle: practical tips from innovative firms/Australian Manufacturing Council, Australian Manufacturing Council, Melbourne Vic. Google Scholar
Contractor, F., and Lorange, P., 1988, Cooperative strategies in International Business, Lexington Books, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Covin, J. G., and Slevin, D. P., 1986, ‘The development and testing of an organizational-level entrepreneurship scale’, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship, Babson College, Mass.Google Scholar
Day, G. S., and Wensley, R., 1988, ‘Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing Competitive superiority’, Journal of Marketing, 52 (April): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of State Development 2000, Innovation: Queensland's future, Department of State Development, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Dess, G. G., Ireland, R. D., and Hitt, M., 1990, ‘Industry effects and strategic management research’, Journal of Management, 16(1): 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, R. D., and Dutton, J. E., 1986, ‘The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis’, Management Science, 32: 1422–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, T., 1988, ‘R&D programs and competencies matrix: Analyzing R&D expertise within the firm’, R&D Management, 18(2): 312–320.Google Scholar
Ettlie, J. E., 1983, ‘Organizational policy and innovation among suppliers to the food-processing Sector’, Academy of Management Journal, 26(1): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxall, G. R., and Fawn, J. R., 1992, ‘An evolutionary model of technological innovation as a strategic management process’, Technovation, 12(3): 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R. M., 1991, ‘Analyzing resources and capabilities’, in Contemporary strategic analysis: Concepts, techniques and applications, (ed.) Grant, Robert M., Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, 93–122.Google Scholar
Hayes, R. H.,Pisano, G. P. and Upton, D. M., 1996, Strategic operations: Competing through capabilities, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Howard, J., 2001, Backing Australia's Ability: Real Results, Real Jobs, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hunt, S. D., and Morgan, R. M., 1995, ‘The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition’, Journal of Marketing, 59 (April): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyvarinen, L., 1990, ‘Innovativeness and its indicators in small and medium-sized industrial Enterprises’, International Small Business Journal, 9(1): 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innovation Study Commission, Business Council of Australia 1993, Managing the Innovating Enterprise, Information Australia, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Keating, P., 1994, Working Nation: Policies and Programs, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., Song, K. and Lee, J. 1993, ‘Determinants of technological innovation in the small firms in Korea’, R&D Management, 23(3): 25–43.Google Scholar
Kuczmarski, T. D., 1996, ‘What is innovation? The art of welcoming risk,’ Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13(5): 7–11.Google Scholar
Lengnick-Hall, C. A., 1992, ‘Innovation and competitive advantage: What we know and what we need to learn’, Journal of Management, 18(2): 399–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, T., 1960, ‘Marketing myopia’, Harvard Business Review, July-August: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, T., and Calantone, R., 1998, ‘The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: conceptualization and empirical examination’, Journal of Marketing, 62 (October): 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinsey & Company and Australian Manufacturing Council, 1993, Emerging exporters: Australia's high value-added manufacturing exporters. Google Scholar
McKinsey & Company Australia 1995, Growth Platforms for a Competitive Australia: Incentives, Aspirations and Innovation, McKinsey, Sydney.Google Scholar
March, J. G., and Simon, H. A. 1958, Organizations, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Menon, A., Sundar, G., and Howell, R. D., 1996, ‘The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effect of functional and dysfunctional conflict in interorganizational relationships’, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 24 (Fall): 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, D., 1988, International collaborative ventures in US manufacturing, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Naman, J. L., and Slevin, D. P., 1993, ‘Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests’, Strategic Management Journal, 14(2): 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. E., 1990, Competitive advantage of nations, Free Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prahalad, C. K., and Hammel, G., 1990, ‘The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68(3): 79–91.Google Scholar
Rizzoni, A., 1991, ‘Technological innovation and small firm : A taxonomy’, International Small Business Journal, 9(30): 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, R., 1992, ‘Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s’, R&D Management, 22 (3): 23–45.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, The theory of economic development, Harvard University Press,, Cambridge Mass. Google Scholar
Tushman, M., and Nadler, D., 1986, ‘Organizing for innovation’, California Management Review, 28(2): 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weerawardena, J., (2003), ‘Exploring the role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy’, Strategic Marketing Journal (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weerawardena, J., (2003a), ‘Exploring the role of market focused learning capability in innovation-based competitive strategy’, European Journal of Marketing (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weerawardena, J., and McColl-Kennedy, J., (2002), ‘New service development and competitive advantage: A conceptual model’, Australasian Marketing Journal, 10(1): 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar