Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T04:55:02.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synchrotron Radiation from Mildly Relativistic Electrons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

J. P. Wild*
Affiliation:
Division of Radiophysics, CSIRO, Sydney

Extract

The exact formula for the intensity of synchrotron radiation emitted by a single charged particle in vacuo was given by Schott, for the case of circular orbits, and Takakura for the case of helical orbits. In the general case the radiated power is expressed in terms of four variables which appear in (among other places) the arguments or orders of a Bessel function and its first derivative; hence the general formula gives little insight into the interpretation of synchrotron radiation and allows evaluation only in particular cases. There is a particular need for approximate formulae that yield the spectrum of the radiation in explicit form. Such approximate formulae were found by Vladimirskii and Schwinger for the case of highly relativistic electrons. In the present paper we outline the derivation of approximate formulae applicable to mildly relativistic electrons, especially those with velocity βc such that 0 ≪ β ≲ O.9. These approximations are also relevant to the case of highly relativistic electrons in a plasma with refractive index appreciably less than unity.

Type
Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schotts, G. A., ‘Electromagnetic radiation’s Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1912.Google Scholar
2 Takakura, T., Publ. Am. Soc. Japan, 12, 352 (1960); Solar Phys., 1, 304 (1967).Google Scholar
3 Vladimirskii, V. V., Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 18, 392 (1948).Google Scholar
4 Schwinger, J., Phys. Rev., 75, 1912 (1949).Google Scholar