Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T10:54:20.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limits on Source Distances for the Most Energetic Cosmic Rays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

R. Lampard ,
R. W. Clay  and
B. R. Dawson
R. Lampard
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Mathematical Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
R. W. Clay*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Mathematical Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
B. R. Dawson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Mathematical Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
*
rclay@physics.adelaide.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The propagation of the highest energy cosmic rays through the 2·7 K microwave background is considered. Photo-pion production interactions cause energy losses for primary cosmic ray protons which result in significant energy degradation over intergalactic distances. The process of energy loss is discussed and an estimate is made of the average distances travelled for observed cosmic rays with a range of energies, assuming a power law source spectrum. At energies over 1020 eV, the average distances travelled are a few tens of megaparsecs, limiting possible sources to the volume dominated by the supergalactic plane.

Keywords

cosmic rays: generalISM: cosmic rays
Type
Research Article
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , 1997 , pp. 258 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1997

References

Aharonian, F. A., & Cronin, J. W. 1994, Phys. Rev., D 50, 1892Google Scholar
Bhattacharjee, P., Hill, C. T., & Schramm, D. N. 1992, Phys. Rev. Lett., 69, 567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, D. J., et al. 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 3401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, D. J., et al. 1995, ApJ, 441, 144 Google Scholar
Elbert, J. W., & Sommers, P. 1995, ApJ, 441, 151 Google Scholar
Geddes, J., Quinn, T. C., & Wald, R. M. 1996, ApJ, 459, 384 Google Scholar
Hill, C. T., & Schramm, D. N. 1985, Phys. Rev., D 31, 565 Google Scholar
Humble, J. E. 1990, Nature, 347, 719 Google Scholar
Kewley, L. J., Clay, R. W., & Dawson, B. R. 1996, Astroparticle Phys., 5, 69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. A., & Clay, R. W. 1995, J. Phys., G 21, 1743Google Scholar
Mather, J. C., et al. 1990, ApJ, 354, L37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protheroe, R. J., & Johnson, P. A. 1996, Astroparticle Phys., 4, 253 Google Scholar
Ptuskin, V. S. 1991, in Astrophysical Aspects of the Most Energetic Cosmic Rays, ed. M. Nagano & F. Takahara (Singapore: World Scientific), 112 Google Scholar
Shaver, P. 1991, Aust. J. Phys., 44, 759 Google Scholar
Stanev, T., et al. 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3056Google Scholar
Szabo, A. P. 1992, PhD Thesis, University of Adelaide Google Scholar
Wall, J. V., & Peacock, J. A. 1985, MNRAS, 216, 173 Google Scholar