Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T08:25:26.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extensions to the Coupling Coefficient Calculations for Muon Telescopes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

C. P. Baker
Affiliation:
Physics Department;University of Tasmania
M. L. Duldig
Affiliation:
Physics Department;University of Tasmania
J. E. Humble
Affiliation:
Physics Department;University of Tasmania

Abstract

The calculation of coupling coefficients for muon telescopes has previously used interpolation from a limited set of asymptotic directions of arrival of primary particles. Furthermore, these calculations have not incorporated curvature of the atmosphere and thus diverge from the true response at zenith angles greater than about 75 degrees. The necessary extensions to calculate coupling coefficients at arbitrary zenith angles are given, including an improved method of incorporating the asymptotic directions of the primary particles. It is shown, using this method, that certain coupling coefficients are highly sensitive to small changes in asymptotic directions for some telescope configurations.

Type
High Energy Astrophysics
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chapman, S. and Bartels, J., 1940, Geomagnetism, Vol. II, 611, Oxford Press.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, K., Murakami, K., Kondo, I. and Nagashima, K., 1977, Proc. XV Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Plovidv, Vol. 4, 321.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, K., Inoue, A., Murakamai, K., Nagashima, K., 1984, Coupling Coefficients of Cosmic Ray Daily Variations for Meson Telescopes, Rep. 9, Cosmic Ray Res. Lab., Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
IAGA Division 1, Working Group 1 1986, International Geomagnetic Reference Field Revision 1985, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 67, 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacklyn, R. M. and Duldig, M. L., 1987, Proc. XX Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Moscow, Vol. 4, 380.Google Scholar
Murakami, K., Sagisaka, S., Inoue, A., Mishima, Y., Nagashima, K., 1976, Proc. Int. Cosmic Ray Symposium on High Energy Modulation, Tokyo, 13 Google Scholar
Nagashima, K., 1971, Rep. of Ionosphere and Space Res. in Japan, Vol. 25, No. 3, 189.Google Scholar
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., 1986, Numerical Recipes, 559, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shea, M. A., Smart, D. F., McCracken, K. G., 1965, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 4117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winckler, J. R. and Stroud, W. G., 1949, Phys. Rev., 76, 1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar