Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T14:31:26.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scientific thought and the boundary of insanity and criminal responsibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Roger Smith
Roger Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Lancaster
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Roger Smith, Department of History, University of Lancaster, Bailrigg, Lancaster LAI 4YG.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The insanity defence is considered in terms of the operation of incommensurable scientific and legal discourses, a dualism which in turn is held to reflect individualist values. This analysis is used to explain both the recurring nature of medico-legal controversy and the historical results of the defence in Victorian England.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 15 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asylum Journal of Mental Science. (1856). Criminal jurisprudence of insanity; 2, 391–392.Google Scholar
Bucknill, J. C. (1855). The trial and conviction of Luigi Buranelli for murder. Plea of insanity. Asylum Journal of Mental Science 1, 209–213.Google Scholar
Bucknill, J. C. (1857 a). Unsoundness of Mind in Relation to Criminal Acts (2nd edn), pp. 133–136. Longmans, Brown, Green, Longmans and Roberts: London.Google Scholar
Bucknill, J. C. (1857 b). Plea of insanity – the trial of William Dove. Asylum Journal of Mental Science 3, 125–134.Google Scholar
Carpenter, W. B. (1853). Principles of Human Physiology (4th edn). Churchill: London.Google Scholar
Glueck, S. (1963). Law and Psychiatry: Cold War or ‘Entente Cordiale’? Tavistock: London.Google Scholar
Lancet (1855). Editorials. The case of Luigi Buranelli; i, 441, 518–519, 540–541, 564–566, 589–591.Google Scholar
Laycock, T. (1860). Mind and Brain: or the Correlations of Consciousness and Organisation. Sutherland and Knox: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Lewinstein, S. R. (1969). The historical development of insanity as a defense in criminal actions. Journal of Forensic Science 14, 275–293, 469–500.Google Scholar
Medical Times and Gazette. (1856). The late murder in Bedford-Row; 12, 166–168.Google Scholar
Platt, A. M. & Diamond, B. L. (1966). The origins of the ‘right and wrong’ test of criminal responsibility and its subsequent development in the United States: an historical survey. California Law Review 54, 1227–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report of the Capital Punishment Commission (1866). Minute 2456. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Scull, A. T. (1975). From madness to mental illness. Medical men as moral entrepreneurs. Archives Européennes de Sociologie 26, 218–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scull, A. T. (1976). Mad-doctors and magistrates: English psychiatry's struggle for professional autonomy in the nineteenth century. Archives Européennes de Sociologie 27, 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scull, A. T. (1979). Museums of Madness. Allen Lane: London.Google Scholar
Stephen, J. F. (1863). A General View of the Criminal Law of England pp. 394, 398–9. Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
Stephen, J. F. (1877). A Digest of the Criminal Law (Crimes and Punishments) pp. 15–16. Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. S. (1865). The Principles and Practice of Medical Jurisprudence pp. xvii–lix, 1121. Churchill: London.Google Scholar
Tuke, D. H. (1866). The plea of insanity in relation to the penalty of death; or, the Report of the Capital Punishment Commission psychologically considered. Social Science Review (new series) 5, 289–309.Google Scholar
Walker, N. (1968). Crime and Insanity in England Vol. 1, The Historical Perspective. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Walker, N. & McCabe, S. (1973). Crime and Insanity in England Vol. 2, New Solutions and New Problems. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
West, D. J. & Walk, A. (eds.) (1977). Daniel McNaughton: His Trial and the Aftermath. Headley Brothers for The British Journal of Psychiatry: Ashford.Google Scholar
Whitlock, F. A. (1963). Criminal Responsibility and Mental Illness. Butterworth: London.Google Scholar
Williams, C. (1856). Observations on the Criminal Responsibility of the Insane: Founded on the Trials of James Hill and of William Dove pp. 13, civ. Churchill: London.Google Scholar
Winslow, F. (1854). Recent trials in lunacy, p. 623. Journal of Psychological Medicine 7, 572–625.Google Scholar