Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T10:59:43.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relationship between suggestibility and anxiety among suspects detained at police stations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

G. H. Gudjonsson*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, London
S. C. Rutter
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, London
I. C. H. Clare
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, London
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Gisli H. Gudjonsson, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF.

Synopsis

The present study investigated the relationship between anxiety, as measured by the State-Trait Inventory (Spielberger, 1983) and interrogative suggestibility, as measured by the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS 2, Gudjonsson, 1987). One hundred and sixty-one suspects detained at two English police stations for questioning were assessed prior to being interviewed by the police. Unexpectedly, trait anxiety correlated more consistently with suggestibility than did state anxiety. The correlations were consistently higher among the Caucasian than the Afro-Caribbean subjects and the Afro-Caribbean subjects were significantly more suggestible than the Caucasian subjects even after their GSS 2 memory and IQ scores had been controlled for. The main practical implications of the findings are that interrogative suggestibility cannot be easily evaluated from the person's self-reported anxiety and the situation in which people are assessed may influence the relationship between these psychological variables.

Type
Brief Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gudjonsson, G. H. (1983). Suggestibility, intelligence, memory recall and personality: an experimental study. British Journal of Psychiatry 142, 3537.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences 5, 303314.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, G. H. (1987). A parallel form of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 26, 215221.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, G. H. (1988). Interrogative suggestibility: its relationship with assertiveness, social-evaluative anxiety, state anxiety and method of coping. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 27, 159166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.Google ScholarPubMed
Gudjonsson, G. H. (1995). The effects of interrogative pressure on strategic coping. Psychology, Crime and Law 1, 309318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudjonsson, G. H. & Clark, N. K. (1986). Suggestibility in police interrogation: a social psychological model. Social Behaviour 1, 83104.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, G., Clare, I., Rutter, S. & Pearse, J. (1993). Persons at Risk During Interviews in Police Custody: The Identification of Vulnerabilities. Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Novy, D. M., Nelson, D. V., Goodwin, J. & Rowzee, R. D. (1993). Psychometric comparability of the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory for different ethnic subpopulation. Psychological Assessment 5, 343349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar