Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T10:51:49.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How parent attitudes and emotional reactions affect their handicapped child's self-concept

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

David Harvey  and
Philip Greenway
David Harvey*
Affiliation:
Department of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand; Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Philip Greenway
Affiliation:
Department of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand; Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
*
lAddress for correspondence: Dr David Harvey, Department of Education, Victoria University, Private Bag, Wellington, New Zealand.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The parents of 24 physically handicapped children were grouped according to their responses to a Primary Mood Factors grid and comparisons were made with their children's responses to a self-concept scale. It was found that parents who were close together in their primary mood reactions had handicapped children who were more positive in self-esteem than those dyads who were divided in their primary mood reaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , May 1982 , pp. 357 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, F. H. & Pearson, G. H. J. (1928). The emotional problems of the physically handicapped child. British Journal of Medical Psychology 8, 212–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angell, R. C. (1936). The Family Encounters the Depression. Gribner: New York.Google Scholar
Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J. & Weakland, J. (1956). Towards a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science 1, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1972). A review of the Piers–Harris self concept scale for children. In Mental Measurements Handbook Vol. I (7th edn) (ed. Buros, E.), pp. 306–307. Gryphon Press: New Jersey.Google Scholar
Broom, L., Lancaster-Jones, F. & Zubrzycki, J. (1965). An occupational classification of the Australian workforce. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 1 (2), Supplement.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, L. (1975). The Family Life of Sick Children. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. D. & Chang, J. J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multi-dimensional scaling via an N-way generalisation of ‘Eckart-Young’ decomposition. Psychometrika 35, 283–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coopersmith, S. (1959). A method of determining types of self esteem. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 59, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowen, M. & Brenton, A. (1975). Developmental training by parents of the very young child with potential handicap. Child: Care, Health and Development I, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cytryn, L., Cytryn, E. & Rieger, R. E. (1967). Psychological implications of cryptorchism. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry 6, 131–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Arcy, E. (1968). Congenital defects: mother's reaction to first information. British Medical Journal iii, 796–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, F. (1963). Passage Through Crisis. Bobbs-Merrill: Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Dunn, T. (undated). Three-mode factor analysis – Method 1. Unpublished mimeograph.Google Scholar
Drotar, D., Baskiewicz, A., Irvin, N., Kennell, J. & Klaus, M. (1975). The adaptation of parents to the birth of an infant with a congenital malformation: a hypothetical model. Pediatrics 56, 710–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and Society. Norton: New York.Google Scholar
Fairchild, S. L. (1976). Achievement motivation, self-concept, and independence training of physically handicapped children. Dissertation Abstracts International 2, 2605-B.Google Scholar
Farber, B. (1959). Effects of a severely mentally retarded child on family integration. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 24, 1–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishler, K. L., Donnell, G. N., Bergen, W. R. & Koch, R. (1972). Intellectual and personality development in children with galactosemia. Pediatrics 50, 412–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fishman, C. A. & Fishman, D. B. (1971). Maternal correlates of self-esteem and overall adjustment in children with birth defects. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 1, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fishman, C. A. & Fishman, D. B. (1975). A group training program in behaviour modification for mothers of children with birth defects. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 6, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flugel, J. C. (1921). The Psychoanalylic Study of the Family. Hogarth Press: New York.Google Scholar
Fransella, F. & Bannister, D. (1977). A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. Academic Press: London.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1955). The Sane Society. Rinehart: New York.Google Scholar
Glaser, H. H., Harrison, G. S. & Lynn, D. B. (1964). Emotional implications of congenital heart disease in children. Pediatrics 33, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor Analysis. Saunders: Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Green, M. & Levitt, E. E. (1962). Construction of body image in children with congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 29, 438–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. H. P. (1980). Coping with handicap: some effects of congenital physical handicap on the perception of parents, children and siblings. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Faculty of Education: Monash University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. H. P. & Greenway, A. P. (in preparation). How parental styles of coping affect their handicapped child's self concept.Google Scholar
Hewett, S. (1976). Research on families with handicapped children. An aid or impediment to understanding. Birth Defects: Original Article Series 12, 35–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Johns, N. (1971). Family reactions to the birth of a child with a congenital abnormality. Medical Journal of Australia 7, 277–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, G. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Vols. 1 and 2. W. W. Norton: New York.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. F. (1970). Maternal reactions to the birth of a defective baby. Social Casework 51, 410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kew, S. (1975). Handicap and Family Crisis. Pitman: London.Google Scholar
Kinn, W. T. (1964). Self-report of physically handicapped and non-handicapped children. Dissertation Abstracts 24 (12), 5196–5197.Google Scholar
Kolin, I., Scherzer, A., New, B. & Garfield, M. (1971). Studies of the school age child with meningomyelocele: social and emotional adaptation. Journal of Pediatrics 78, 1013–1019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, J. (1965). Three mode factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin 64, 442–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAndrew, I. (1976). Children with a handicap and their families. Child: Care, Health and Development 2, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNair, D. M., Lorr, M. & Droppleman, L. F. (1970). ETTS Manual for the Profile of Mood States. Educational and Industrial Testing Service: San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Mattsson, A. & Gross, S. (1966). Social and behavioral studies on hemophilic children and their families. Journal of Pediatrics 68, 952–964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, C. (1976). A survey of 30 physically handicapped children and their families. Unpublished dissertation for B.Sp.Ed. degree, Faculty of Education: Monash University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. & Bents, D. H. (1975). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (2nd edn). McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
Piers, E. V. (1969). Manual for the Piers–Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale. Counsellor Recordings and Tests: Nashville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Piers, E. V. (1976). The Piers–Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale. Research Monograph, No. 1. Counsellor Recordings and Tests: Nashville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Pless, I. B. & Douglas, J. W. B. (1971). Chronic illness in childhood: I. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics. Pediatrics 47, 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pless, I. B. & Satterwhite, B. (1973). A measure of family functioning and its application. Social Science and Medicine 7, 613–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pless, I. B., Roghmann, K. & Haggerty, R. J. (1972). Chronic illness, family functioning, and psychological adjustment: A model for the allocation of preventive Mental Health Services. International Journal of Epidemiology 1, 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, S. A., Hastorf, A. H. & Dornbusch, S. M. (1964). Effects of physical disability on a child's description of himself. Child Development 35, 893–907.Google ScholarPubMed
Rösler, F. (1979). Identifying inter-individual judgement differences: INDSCAL or three-mode factor analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research 14, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rummel, R. J. (1970). Applied Factor Analysis. Northwestern University Press: Evanston.Google Scholar
Schecter, M. D. (1961). The orthopaedically handicapped child: emotional reactions. Archives of General Psychiatry 4, 247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shontz, F. C. (1970). Physical disability and personality: theory and recent research. Psychological Aspects of Disability 17, 51–69.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. (1966). Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 31, 279–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westley, W. A. & Epstein, N. B. (1969). Silent Majority. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.Google Scholar
Wylie, R. C. (1974). The Self-Concept (revised edn), Vol. I. University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln.Google Scholar