Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T00:42:06.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of survival analysis to the inception of dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Elizabeth Sturt
Elizabeth Sturt*
Affiliation:
Genetics Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London
*
1Address for correspondence: Genetics Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The age at onset of dementia of the Alzheimer, Pick or senile type in relatives of probands with early onset dementia was examined using survival analytical techniques applied to data collected by Sjögren et al. (1952). Female relatives were found to have a higher risk of dementia than males, and there was a deficit of affected brothers compared with fathers of probands. In these comparisons due allowance was made for age at the last observation of each relative. Relatives of probable and definite Pick probands had a higher risk than relatives of probable and definite Alzheimer probands, but the difference was not significant and dementia did not occur at an earlier age to the former group.

For the relatives as a whole, and for subgroups of relatives, the risk of dementia increased with age, at least up to age 80. It is hypothesized that the pattern of the age-related hazard of dementia is due to the nature of the dementing process; that this slow degenerative process is widespread; and that individual differences in the rate of the process are under the influence of genes. The statistical methods are explained in detail as they have rarely been applied to dementia before, though Chase et al. (1983) have used life tables and survival analysis in testing genetic hypotheses, with an application to Alzheimer's disease.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , August 1986 , pp. 583 - 593
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armitage, P. & Doll, R. (1954). The age distribution of cancer and a multi-stage theory of carcinogenesis. British Journal of Cancer 8, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blessed, G., Tomlinson, B. E. & Roth, M. (1968). The association between quantitive measures of dementia and of senile changes in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. British Journal of Psychiatry 114, 797–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BMDP Statistical Software (1983). 1983 Printing with Additions (chief editor: Dixon, W. J.). University of California Press.Google Scholar
Breitner, J. C. S. & Folstein, M. F. (1984). Familial Alzheimer dementia: a prevalent disorder with specific clinical features. Psychological Medicine 14, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burch, P. R. J. (1984). Cancer and senescence: is there a biological link? Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, Twin Research 33, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, G. A., Folstein, M. F., Breitner, J. C. S., Beaty, T. H. & Self, S. G. (1983). The use of life tables and survival analysis in testing genetic hypotheses, with an application of Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Epidemiology 117 (5), 590–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J. C. (1958). Multiple-mutation theory of carcinogenesis. Nature 181, 651–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottesman, I. I. & Shields, J. (1982). Schizophrenia; The Epigenetic Puzzle. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hagnell, O., Lanke, J., Rorsman, B. & Öjesjö, L. (1981). Does the incidence of age psychosis decrease? A prospective longitudinal Study of a complete population investigated during the 25 year period 1947–1972: the Lundby Study. Neuropsychobiology 7, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heston, L. L. (1983), Dementia of the Alzheimer type: a perspective from family studies. Banbury Report 15: Biological Aspects of Alzheimer's Disease (ed. Katzman, R.), pp. 183–192. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: New York.Google Scholar
Heston, L. L., Mastri, A. R., Anderson, E. & White, J. (1981). Dementia of the Alzheimer type. Archives of General Psychiatry 38, 1085–1090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalbfleisch, J. D. & Prentice, R. L. (1981). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. L. & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53, 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, T., Sjögren, T. & Jacobson, G. (1963). Senile dementia: a clinical, sociomedical and genetic study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia Suppl. 167, 39, 1–159.Google Scholar
Matsuyama, H. (1983). Incidence of neurofibrillary change, senile plaques, and granulovacuolar degeneration in aged individuals. In Alzheimer's Disease The Standard Reference (ed. Reisberg, B.). The Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
Mortimer, J. A., Schuman, L. M. & French, L. R. (1981). Epidemiology of dementing illness. In The Epidemiology of Dementia (ed. Mortimer, J. A. and Schuman, L. M.), pp. 3–23. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Pike, M. C. (1966). A method of analysis of a certain class of experiments in carcinogenesis. Biometrics 22, 142–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risch, N. (1983). Estimating morbidity risk with variable age of onset: review of methods and a maximum likelihood approach. Biometrics 39, 929–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinex, F. M. & Myers, R. H. (1982). Alzheimer's Disease, Down's syndrome and aging: the genetic approach. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 396, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sjögren, T., Sjögren, H. & Lindgren, T. G. H. (1952). Morbus Alzheimer and Morbus Pick. A genetic, clinical and pathoanatomical study. Acta Psychiatrica et Neurologica Scandinavica Suppl. 82.Google Scholar
Slater, E. & Cowie, V. (1971). The Genetics of Mental Disorders. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Sluss, T. K., Gruenberg, E. M. & Kramer, M. (1981). The use of longitudinal studies in the investigation of risk factors for senile dementia. In The Epidemiology of Dementia (ed. Mortimer, J. A. and Schuman, L. S.), pp. 132–154. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Strömgren, E. (1935). Zum Ersatz des Weinbergschen abgekürtzen Verfahrens. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 153, 784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturt, E. (1984). Letter to the Editor. Biometrics 40, 1176–1177.Google Scholar
Sturt, E., Kumakura, N. & Der, G. (1984). How depressing life is; life long morbidity risk for depressive disorder in the general population. Journal of Affective Disorders 7, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, W. D. & Weissman, M. M. (1981). Quantifying lifetime risk of psychiatric disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, W. (1915). Zur Korrektur des Einflusses der Lebensdauer und Todesauslese auf die Ergebnisse bestimmter Kreuzungen. Archiv für Rassen- und Gesellschafts-Biologie 11, 434.Google Scholar