No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Scientific Anthropology—Scientific Anthropological Archaeology: Comments on Dunnell and Jarvie
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Part XVIII. Philosophical Problems of Anthropology
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1985 by the Philosophy of Science Association
References
Dunnell, Robert C (1985). “Methodological Issues In Contemporary Americanist Archaeology.” In PSA 1984. Volume 2 . Edited by Asquith, P.D and P. Kitoher. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 717-744 .Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian, (ed.). (1982). Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvie, Ian (1985). “Anthropology as Science and the Anthropology of Science and of Anthropology or Understanding and Explanation in the Social Sciences, Part II .” In PSA 1984, Volume 2 . Edited by Asquith, P.D and Kitcher, P. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 745-763.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. (Philosophical Papers, Volume 1.) (eds.) J. Worrall and G. Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauden, Larry (1977). Progress and its Problems. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin (1984). Approaches to Social Archaeology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, P.J.; LeBlanc, S.A.; and Redman, C.L (1984). Archeological Explanation. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Peter (1958). The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar