Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T07:18:43.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reductionist Research Programmes in Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Robert C. Richardson
Robert C. Richardson*
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Contemporary psychology has been dominated by two distinct paradigms, each of which have given rise to comprehensive and fruitful research programmes. The functionalist programme purports to explain our cognitive capacities — what Noam Chomsky (1965, pp. 3 ff.) dubs our “competence” — in terms of the operations and transformations effected on the available “information”. Explaining, e.g., an ability such as color perception means isolating the cues on which we rely in making our judgments as to color, and proceeding to explain how, on the basis of information available from such cues, we could come to reach our actual judgments. This will involve explaining, for example, how it is that our perceptions of color are constant and reliable despite substantial variation in the intensity of light impinging on the retina — particularly since the intensity of such light seems to be the only relevant parameter which could guide our judgments.

Type
Part VI. Reduction in Biology and Psychology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1980 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1980 , 1980 , pp. 171 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Preliminary research relevant to this work was supported by grants from the University Research Council and the Taft Committee at the University of Cincinnati. I am thankful for their support.

References

Chomsky, Noam. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, Patricia. (1980). “A Perspective on Mind-Brain Research.” The Journal of Philosophy 77: 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennet, Daniel C. (1980). “Three Kinds of Intentional Psychology.” Forthcoming in a Thyssen Philosophy Group volume. Edited by Healey, R.A.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. (1968). Psychological Explanation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. and Bever, T. (1965). “The Psychological Reality of Linguistic Segments.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior IV: 414–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M., Bever, T., and Fodor, J. (1966). “The Active Use of Grammar in Speech Perception.” Perception and Psychophysics 1: 30–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N. (1964). “The Development of the Brain and the Evolution of Language.” In Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics. Volume 17. Edited by Stuart, C.I.J.M.. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Pages 155–169. (As reprinted in Geschwind (1974). Pages 86–104.)Google Scholar
Geschwind, N. (1965). “Disconnexion Syndromes in Animals and Man.” Brain 88: 237–294 and 585-644. (As reprinted in Geschwind (1974). Pages 105–236.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geschwind, N. (1967). “Wernicke's Contribution to the Study of Aphasia.” Cortex 3: 449–463. (As reprinted in Geschwind (1974). Pages 284–298.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N. (1969). “Problems in the Anatomical Understanding of the Aphasias.” In Contributions to Clinical Neuropsychology. Edited by Benton, A.L. Chicago: Aldine. Pages 107–128. (As reprinted in Geschwind (1974). Pages 431–451.)Google Scholar
Geschwind, N. (1973). “The Brain and Language.” In Communication, Language, and Meaning. Edited by Miller, George A.. New York: Basic Books. Pages 61–72.Google Scholar
Geschwind, N. (1974). Selected Papers on Language and the Brain. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 16.) Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N. (1979). “Specialisations of the Human Brain.” Scientific American 241(No. 3): 180–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R.L. (1961). “The Brain as an Engineering Problem.” In Current Problems in Animal Behavior. Edited by Thorpe, W.H. and Zangwill, O.L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pages 307–330.Google Scholar
Gregory, R.L. (1968). “Models and the Localization of Function in the Central Nervous System.” In Key Papers in Cybernetics. Edited by Evans, C.R. and Robertson, A.D.J.. London: Butterworths. Pages 91–102.Google Scholar
Hebb, D.O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Held, Richard, and Hein, Alan. (1963). “Movement-Produced Stimulation in the Development of Visually Guided Behavior.” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 56: 872–876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, Barbara von Eckhardt. (1978). “Inferring Functional Localization from Neurological Evidence.” In Walker (1978). Pages 27–66.Google Scholar
Land, Edwin. (1959). “Experiments in Color Vision.” Scientific American 200(No. 5): 84–99. (As reprinted in Perception: Mechanisms and Models. Edited by Held, R. and Richards, W. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1972. Pages 286–298.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Land, Edwin. (1977). “The Retinex Theory of Color Vision.” Scientific American 237(No. 6): 108–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lassen, N.A., Ingvar, D.H., and Skinhoj, E. (1978). “Brain Function and Blood Flow.” Scientific American 239(No. 4): 62–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenneberg, R.C. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R.C. (1961). “Evolution and the Theory of Games.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 1: 382–403. (As reprinted in Topics in the Philosophy of Biology. Edited by Grene, M. and Mendelsohn, E. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1976. Pages 286–311.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R.C. (1978). “Adaptation.” Scientific American 239(No. 3): 212–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R.C. (1979) “Sociobiology as an Adaptationist Program.” Behavioral Sciences 24: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, Ulric. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, John, and Nadel, Lynn. (1978). The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Penfield, W., and Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Robert C. (1979). “Functionalism and Reductionism.” Philosophy of Science 46: 533–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Robert C. (1980). “Intentional Realism or Intentional Instrumentalism.” Cognition and Brain Theory, III.Google Scholar
Risberg, Jarl et al. (1975). “Hemispheric Specialization in Normal Man Studied by Bilateral Measurements of the Regional Cerebral Blood Flow.” Brain 98: 511–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, Steven. (1973). The Conscious Brain. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, David. (1978). “Some Neurological Techniques for Assessing Localization of Function.” In Walker (1978). Pages 219–228.Google Scholar
Roughgarden, Jonathan. (1979). Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Sperry, R.W. (1974). “Lateral Specialization in the Surgically Separated Hemispheres.” In The Neurosciences Third Study Program. Edited by Schmitt, F.O. and Worden, F.G.. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press. Pages 5–19.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Walker, E. (ed.). (1978). Explorations in the Biology of Language. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William. (1976). “Reduction, Levels of Organization and the Mind-Body Problem.” In Brain and Consciousness. Edited by Globus, G., Maxwell, G. and Savodnik, I. New York: Plenum Press. Pages 199–267.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William. (1980). “Reductionistic Research Strategies and their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy.” In Scientific Discovery, Vol. 2: Case Studies. Edited by Nickles, Tom. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. In Press.Google Scholar