Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T17:32:17.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant's Philosophy of Science: The Transition From Metaphysics to Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Robert E Butts
Robert E Butts*
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For many of us nurtured in idealist ways inclining us to unwavering acceptance of Kantian principles, 1951 was a bad year. We read in Reichenbach's The Rise of Saientifio Philosophy of the “disintegration of the synthetic a priori”. Kant had taught us that there are very general principles—each one connected to a primal category of thought—that are necessary in the formation of mathematics and physics and are expressible in nonanalytic propositions. However, since Kant's death in 1804 both mathematics and physics have developed revolutionary traits: non-euclidian geometries, new developments in symbolic logic, relativity physics, and finally, quantum mechanics, sealed the negative fate of Kant's high principles. Henceforth we must accept that there are no non-empty claims about reality that can be counted as necessary or indispensable to mathematics and science.

Type
Part XVII. Kant's Philosophy of Science
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1984 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1984 , 1984 , pp. 684 - 705
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adickes, E (1924). Kant als Naturforsoher (Vol. II, 1925.) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, L. W (1960). A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, L. W. (ed.) (1972). Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, L. W (1981). “Kant on the Uniformity of Nature.” Synthese M: 449-464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittan, G. G Jr., (1978). Kant's Theory of Science. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, G (1969). Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, G (1972). “The Concept of Lawlikeness in Kant's Philosophy of Science.” In Beck (1972). Pages 149-171.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, G (1983). “Metaphysical and Internal Realism: the Relations between Ontology and Methodology in Kant's Philosophy of Science.” Paper presented at the 7th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Salzburg, Austria.Google Scholar
Butts, R. E (1972). “On Buchdahl's and Palter's Papers.” In Beck (1972). Pages 188-199.Google Scholar
Butts, R. E (1984). Kant and the Double Government Methodology: Supersensibility and Method in Kant's Philosophy of Science. (The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Volume 24.) Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, E (1921). Kants Leben und Lehre. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. (As reprinted as Kant's Life and Thought, (trans.) James Haden. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Duncan, H (1984). “Inertia, the Communication of Motion, and Kant's Third Law of Mechanics.” Philosophy of Science 51: 93-119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A (1949). “Reply to Criticisms.” In Schilpp (1949). Pages 665-688.Google Scholar
Harman, P (1982). Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy. Brighton, England: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Harper, W (1981). “Kant's Empirical Realism and the Second Analogy of Experience.” Synthese 47: 465-480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, J (1969). “Kant on the Mathematical Method.” In Kant Studies Today. Edited by Beck, L. W. La Salle, III.: Open Court. Pages 117-140.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P (1975). “Kant and the Foundations of Mathematics.” Philosophical Review 84: 23-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P (1983). “Kant's Philosophy of Science.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume VIII. Edited by French, P.A, Uehling, T.E Jr. and Wettstein, H.R. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Pages 387-407.Google Scholar
Körner, S (1955). Kant. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books, Ltd.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I (1929). Mind and the World Order. New York: Dover. (As reprinted 1956).Google Scholar
Okruhlik, K (1983). “Kant on the Foundations of Science.” In Nature Mathematized. (The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Volume 20.) Edited by W. Shea. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Pages 251-268.Google Scholar
Palter, R (1972). “Absolute Space and Absolute Motion in Kant's Critical Philosophy.” In Beck (1972). Pages 172-187.Google Scholar
Pap, A (1946). The A Priori in Physical Theory. New York: Russell & Russell. (As reprinted 1968).Google Scholar
Parsons, C (1971). “Kant's Philosophy of Arithmetic.” In Philosophy, Science, and Method. Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel. Edited by S. Morgenbesser, P. Suppes & M. White. London & New York: Macmillan & St. Martin's. Pages 568-594.Google Scholar
Plaass, P (1960). Kants Theorie der Naturwissensahaft. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Rupprecht.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H (1949). “The Philosophical Significance of the Theory of Relativity.” In Schilpp (1949). Pages 289-311.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H (1951). The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) (1949). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. (The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. VII). Evanston, 111.: The Library of Living Philosophers.Google Scholar
Vuillemin, O (1955). Physique et metaphysique kantiennes. Paris: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
Werkmeister, W (1980). Kant/The Architectonic and Development of His Philosophy. La Salle, 111.: Open Court.Google Scholar