Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-mhpxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:48:24.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self Organization and Adaptation in Insect Societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Robert E. Page Jr.  and
Sandra D. Mitchell
Robert E. Page Jr.
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis and University of California, San Diego
Sandra D. Mitchell
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis and University of California, San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The social organization of insect colonies has fascinated biologists and natural historians for centuries. Aristotle wrote in History of Animals about a division of labor among workers within the hive that is based on age. He observed that the field bees foraging for nectar and pollen have less “hair” on their bodies than the hive bees that care for young larvae and tend the nest. He concluded that the more pubescent hive bees must be older. We now know that, in fact, the field bees are older and have less hair because the hairs break off as the bees age. The phenomenon of age related changes in behavior, age-polyethism, is now well documented for many social insects (Oster and Wilson 1978).

Evidence of the ecological success of social insects is inescapable. Virtually everywhere you look you see them or the results of their activities.

Type
Part VII. Self-Organization, Selection and Evolution
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1990 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1990 , 1990 , pp. 289 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This work was funded by National Science Foundation Grants BNS-8719283 and BNS-9096139 to R.E. Page. S. D. Mitchell thanks the Population Biology Center, University of California, Davis, and the University of California Chancellor’s Summer Faculty Fellowship for partial support.

References

Evans, H.E. (1966), “The Behavior Patterns of Solitary Wasps”, Annual Review of Entomology 11: 123–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S.J. (1978), “Sociobiology: the Art of Storytelling”, New Scientist 80: 530–533.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C. (1979), “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: a Critique of the Adaptationist Program”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 205: 581–598.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S.A. (1984), “Emergent Properties in Random Complex Automata”, Physica 10D: 145–156.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S.A. (forthcoming), Self Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michener, C.D. (1974) The Social Bees. Campbridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.D. (1987), “Competing Units of Selection? A Case of Symbiosis”, Philosophy of Science 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oster, G. F. and Wilson, E.O. (1978), Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Page, R.E. and Robinson, G.E. (in press), “The Genetics of Division of Labor in Honey Bee Colonies”, Advances in Insect Physiology, Volume 23.Google Scholar
Seeley, T.D. (1985), Honey Bee Ecology: a Study in Adaptation in Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West-Eberhard, M.J. (1987), “Flexible Strategy and Social Evolution”, in Animal Societies: Theories and Facts, Brown, J. L. and Kikkawa, J. (eds.). Tokyo: Japan Sci. Soc. Press, pp. 35–51.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1985a), “The Sociogenesis of Insect Colonies”, Science 228: 1489–1495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E.O. (1985b), “The Principles of Caste Evolution”, in Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Hölldobler, B. and Lindauer, M. (eds.). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc., pp. 307–324.Google Scholar
Winston, M.L. (1987), The Biology of the Honey Bee. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winston, M.L. and Katz, S.J. (1982), “Foraging Differences between Cross-fostered Honeybee Workers (Apis mellifera) of European and Africanized Races”, Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 10: 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar