Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-22T11:33:31.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantum Logic and Meaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2022

Geoffrey Hellman*
Affiliation:
Indiana University

Extract

In concluding their major survey, “Quantum Logics,” Greechie and Gudder (1975) listed four outstanding directions for future research, the last of which was, “Explain the meaning of the word ‘logic’ in the title of this paper.” Broadly speaking, there are two radically different points of view on this. There is the view that, taken strictly, ‘logic’ is a misnomer: quantum logic studies certain algebraic structures naturally arising from the formal, apparatus of quantum theory, structures which may afford insights into quantum physics, on a number of levels, but which do not in any way involve giving up or replacing classical logical laws. (Cf., e.g., Jauch (1968, p. 77).) In contrast, there is the view that the non-Boolean structures arising from the Hilbert space formalism should be taken as giving rise to a genuine non-classical logic, in conflict with classical logic, but appropriate to the description of quantum mechanical reality.

Type
Part IX. Quantum Logic and Quantum Mathematics
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This material is in part based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. SES-7924874. I am grateful to Linda : Wessels, J. Michael Dunn, J. Alberto Coffa, David Malament, and Richard Healey for helpful discussion on the issues of this paper, and to Bas van Fraassen, Nuel Belnap, and Hilary Putnam for thought-provoking correspondence .

References

Belinfante, F.J. (1973). A Survey of Hidden Variable Theories. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Bell, J.S. (1966). “On the Problems of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics 38: 447-452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bub, J. (1973). “On the Completeness of Quantum Mechanics.” In Contemporary Research In the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory. (University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Volume 2.) Edited by Hooker, C.A.. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pages 1-65.Google Scholar
Bub, J.. (1979). “Some Reflections on Quantum Logic and Schrödinger's Cat.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30: 27-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J.M. (1981). “Quantum Mathematics.” In PSA 1980. Volume 2. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Giere, R.N.. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 512-531.Google Scholar
Fine, A. (1972). “Some Conceptual Problems of Quantum Theory.” In Paradigms and Paradoxes. (University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 5.) Edited by R.G., Colodny. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Pages 3-31.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, D. (1969). “Matter, Space, and Logic.” In Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, 1966/1968. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Volume 5.) Edited by Cohen, R.S. and Hartofsky, M.. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pages 199-215.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, D. (1972). “The Physics of Logic.” In Paradigms and Paradoxes. (University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 5.) Edited by Colodny, R.G. . Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Pages 117-66.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. and Glymour, C. (1972). “If Quanta Had Logic.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 1: 16-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. and Putnam, H. (1978). “Quantum Logic, Conditional Probability, and Interference.” Dialectica 32: 305-315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M. (1971). “Is Quantum Logic Really Logic?Philosophy of Science 38: 508-529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greechie, R.J. and Gudder, S.P. (1975). “Quantum Logics.“ The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics. (The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science. Volume 5.) Edited by C.A. Hooker. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pages 545-575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, R. (1977). “A Realistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics?” Ph.D. Thesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Hellman, G., “Quantum Logic and the Production Postulate.” (Unpublished Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Jauch, J.M., (1968). Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Reading,Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Koohen, S., and Speaker, E.P. (1967) in “The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.” Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17: 59-87.Google Scholar
Maokey, G. (1963). The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Benjamin.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. (1978). “Only If Quanta Had Logic.” In PSA 1978 Volume 1. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Hacking, I.. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 268-276.Google Scholar
Piron, C. (1976). Foundations of Quantum Physics. New York: Benjamin.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1969). “Is Logic Empirical?” In Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Volume 5). Edited by Cohen, R.S. and Wartofsky, M.W.. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pages 216-241.(As Reprinted as “The Logic of Quantum Mechanics.” In Philosophical Papers. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. Pages 17H-197.)Google Scholar
Putnam, H., (1975). “The Meaning Of ‘Meaning'.” In Language. Mind and Knowledge . (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Volume 7 ) . Edited by Gunderson, K.. Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press: Pages 131-193. (As Reprinted in Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. Pages 215-271.)Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1970). Prentice-Hall. Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs , N.J.Google Scholar
Takeuti, G., “Quantum Set Theory.” (Unpublished Manuscript.)Google Scholar