Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-vrt8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:32:09.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conceptual Evolution: a Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

David L. Hull*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Part VI. Science As Process
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper was written in part under NSF grant DIR-9012258.

References

Bradie, M. (1986), “Assessing Evolutionary Epistemology”, Biology & Philosophy. 1: 401–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J. (1990), “Scientific Pluralism and the Plurality of the Sciences: Comments on David Hull’s ‘Science as a Process’”, Philosophical Studies. 60:6176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettinger, L., Jablonka, E. and McLaughlin, P. (1990), “On the Adaptations of Organisms and the Fitness of Types”, Philosophy of Science. 57: 490513.10.1086/289570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, V. (1985), The Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Griesemer, J.R. (1988), “Genes, Memes and Demes”, Biology & Philosophy. 3: 179–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1989), “A Function for Actual Examples in Philosophy of Science”, in What Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays for David Hull., Ruse, M. (ed.). Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 313–24.Google Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1990), “Conceptual Selection”, Philosophical Studies. 60: 7787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkes, K. (1988), Real People: Personal Identity without Thought Experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, G.C. (1966), Adaptation and Natural Selection, New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar