Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T13:20:25.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Causal Propensity: A Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

I . J Good
I . J Good*
Affiliation:
Va. Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“We can judge of the perfection to which a science has come by the facility, more or less great, with which it may be approached by calculation.”

Quetelet (1828), as quoted by Landau & Lazarsfeld in the International Encyclopedia of Statistics (p. 828).

Suppose that some event F occurs and later an event E either occurs or does not. I am going to talk about the extent to which F tends to cause E, or the causal propensity of E provided by F, or the propensity or tendency of F to cause E, denoted by Q(E:F). For example, F might be the event that the captain of a firing squad shouts “Fire” and E might be that the shootee's life is_ Ended (F for Fire, E for Ended). The negation of E is denoted by E, which in this example means that the shootee does not drop dead.

Type
Part XXI. Generalizations of Bayesian Methods
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1984 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1984 , 1984 , pp. 828 - 850
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This work was supported in part by an N. I. H. grant number 18770. A preliminary version of the paper was presented, by a 27-minute audio-tape, at a session on Probability of Causation organized by Peter G. Groer for the Annual Meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis, 1984 September 31 to October 3, Knoxville, Tennessee.

References

Bortkiewiez, Ladislaus von (1911). Discussion in a conference. Schriften des Verein(s) für Sozialpolitik 138: 175-176.Google Scholar
Buck, S.F and Wioken, A.J (1967). “Models for use in investigating the risk of mortality from lung cancer and bronchitis.” Journal of the Roval Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics 16: 185-210 (including discussion).Google Scholar
Cohen, Morris R and Nagel, Ernest (1931). An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Cox, R.T (1961). The Algebra of Probable Inference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Deaton, M.L and Foutz, R.V (1980). “C75: Path analysis for complex-valued random variables with an application to spectral analysis of time series.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 12: 61-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A.W.F (1963). “The measure of association in a 2 x 2 contingency table.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 126: 109-114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feynman, R.P (1948). “Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics.” Review of Modern Physics 20: 367-387. (As reprinted in Quantum Electrodynamics. Edited by J. Schwinger. New York: Dover, 1958. Pages 321-341.Google Scholar
Feynman, R.P and Hibbs, A.R (1965). Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fleiss, J.L (1973). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Good, I.J (1959). “Kinds of probability.” Science 129: 443-447. (Reprinted in Good 1983b. Pages 63-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1961). “A causal calculus.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11: 305-318; 12: 43-51; 13(1962): 88. (Reprinted with the errata incorporated in Good 1983b. Pages 197-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J. (general editor). (1962). The Scientist Speculates: An Anthology of Partiv-Baked Ideas. London: Heineman.Google Scholar
Good, I.J (1965). “Speculations concerning the first ultra-intelligent machine.” Advances in Computers 6: 31-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1966). “A derivation of the probabilistic explication of information.” Journal of the Roval Statistical Society B 28: 578-581.Google Scholar
Good, I.J (1967). Contribution to the discussion of Buck and Wicken (1967). Pages 206-208.Google Scholar
Good, I.J (1968). “Corroboratlon, explanation, evolving probability, simplicity, and a sharpened razor.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19: 123-143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1971). “The probabilistic explication of information, evidence, surprise, causality, explanation, and utility.” In Foundations of Statistical Inference. Edited by V.P. Godambe and D.A. Sprott. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Pages 108-141 (including discussion). (Largely reprinted in Good 1983b. Pages 184-192.Google Scholar
Good, I.J (1972). “Review of Patrick Suppes, A Probabilistic Theory of Causality. (Acta Philoaoohioa Fennica, Faso. XXIV.)” Journal of the American Statistical Association 67: 245-246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1974). “Random thoughts about randomness.” In PSA 1972. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume XX.) Edited by K.F. Schaffner and R.S. Cohen. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pages 117-135. (Reprinted in Good 1983b. Pages 83-94.Google Scholar
Good, I.J (1977). “Explicativity: a mathematical theory of explanation with statistical applications.” Proceedings of the Roval Society (London) A 354: 303-330; A 377(1981): 503. (Partly reprinted in Good 1983b. Pages 219-236.Google Scholar
Good, I.J (1978). “C22: Path analysis and correlation for power functions.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 8: 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1979a). “Fallacies, statistical.” In The International Encyclopedia of Statistics. Edited by W.H. Kruskal and J.M. Tanur. New York: The Free Press. Pages 337-349.Google Scholar
Good, I.J (1979b). “Studies in the history of probability and statistics, XXXVII: Turing's statistical work in World War II.” Biometrika 66: 393-396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1980a). “Some comments on probabilistic causality.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61: 301-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1980b). “A further comment on probabilistic causality: mending the chain.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61: 452-454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1980c). “C71: Degrees of causation in regression analysis.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 11: 153-155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1980d). “C80: Feynman's path integrals and Sewall Wright's path analysis.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 12: 74-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1980e). “C81: A simplification in the ‘causal calculus'.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 12: 77-78. (Reprinted in Good 1983b. Page 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1981). “C103: The effect of permutations of rows and columns on measures of association.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 13: 309-312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1983a). Review of R. Levine and M. Tribus (eds.), The Maximum Entropy Formalism. Journal of the American Statistical Association 78: 987-989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1983b). Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and its Applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Good, I.J (1984a). “C197: The best explicatum for weight of evidence.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 19: 294-299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J (1984b). “C218: A correction concerning degrees of causation.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 20: 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J and McMichael, Alan F (1984). “A pragmatic modification of explicatlvity for the acceptance of hypotheses.” Philosophy of Science SI: 120-127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I.J and Mittal, Y (1984). “The amalgamation and geometry of two-by-two contingency tables.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Goodman, L.A and Kruskal, H.H (1954, 1959). “Measures of association for cross—classifications.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 4Q: 732-764; 54: 123-163. (As reprinted in Measures of Association for Cross-Classifioations. New York: Springer, 1979.Google Scholar
Granger, C.W.J and Hatanaka, M (1964). Spectral Analysis of Economic Time Series. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, B.G (1969). “Problems of statistical inference in health with special reference to the cigarette smoking and lung cancer controversy.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 64: 739-758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A and Honore, A.M (1959). Causation in the Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Paul (1980). “Cutting the causal chain.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61; 305-314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J.M (1921). A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Landau, Davi and Lazarsfeld, Paul F (1978). “Quetelet, Adolphe.” In International Encyclopedia of Statistics, Volume 2. Edited by W.H. Kruskal and J.M. Tanur. New York: The Free Press. Pages 824-834.Google Scholar
Lindley, D.V and Noviek, M.R (1981). “The role of exchangeability in inference.” Annals of Statistics 9: 45-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quetelet, Adolphe (1828). Instructions populaires sur le caloul probabilities. Brussels: Tarlier.Google Scholar
Heiohenbach, Hans (1956). The Direction of Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Royal, Signals (1947). Handbook of Line Communication P Volume 1. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1948). Human Knowledge. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Salmon, H (1980). “Probabilistic causality.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61: 50-74 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L.J (1954). Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sheps, M.C (1958). “Shall we count the living or the dead?” The New England Journal of Medicine 259: 1210-1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheps, M.C (1959). “An examination of some methods of comparing several rates or proportions.” Biometrics 15: 87-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, E.H (1951). “The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables.” Journal of the Roval Statistical Society B 13: 238-241.Google Scholar
Suppes, Patrick (1970). ft Probabilistic Theory of Causality. (Aota Philosophioa Fennioa, Fasc. XXIV.) Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Tate, Robert F (1978). “Path analysis.” In International Encyclopedia of Statistics. Volume 1. Edited by W.H. Kruskal and J.M. Tanur. New York: The Free Press. Pages 624-628.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert (1956). “The theory of prediction.” In Modern Mathematics for the Engineer. Edited by E.F. Beckenbach. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pages 165-190.Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall (1918). “On the nature of size factors.” Genetics 3: 367-374 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, G.U (1903). “Notes on the theory of association of attributes in statistics.” Biometrika 2: 121-134. (As reprinted in Statistical Papers of George Udnv Yule. London: Griffin, 1971. Pages 71-84.Google Scholar
Yule, G.U (1911). An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. London: Griffin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, G.U and Kendall, M.G (1950). An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. 14th ed. London: Griffin.Google Scholar