Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T20:37:16.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Thomas Appointment: Defeats and Victories for Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Marian Lief Palley  and
Howard A. Palley
Marian Lief Palley
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Howard A. Palley
Affiliation:
University of Maryland at Baltimore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On October 15, 1991, the United States Senate approved the appointment of Judge Clarence Thomas to the United States Supreme Court by a vote of 52 to 48. The presidents's selection of Judge Thomas to replace Thurgood Marshall as the Court's lone African-American justice and the hearings that preceded the Senate's confirmation of his appointment initially engendered questions about his qualifications to serve on the Supreme Court and his conservative political positions. Later, queries arising from accusations of sexual harassment took center stage. In fact, in the weeks immediately preceding his confirmation attention turned almost entirely from his judicial qualifications and his political positions to allegations of sexual harassment.

Thomas's confirmation is a story of racial politics enmeshed with gender politics and the conservative social agenda of the Reagan-Bush administrations. It is important to understand this process if one is to fathom some of the events that followed in the wake of this judicial appointment.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 473 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cushman, John H. Jr., 1992. “Members of an Exclusive Club Attend Monthly Talk on ‘Gender Dynamics.’” The New York Times, 7 March.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1991. “Justice for Clarence Thomas.” The New York Review of Books 38: 41.Google Scholar
Farre, John Aloysius. 1992. “Bush Endorses Senate's Rights Bill.” The Boston Globe, 26 October: 1, 5.Google Scholar
Ifill, Gwen. 1991. “Female Lawmakers Wrestle With New Public Attitude on ‘Women's’ Issues.” The New York Times, 18 November.Google Scholar
Lehrman, Karen. 1992. “Boy Toys.” The New Republic 206: 45.Google Scholar
Schneider, William. 1991. “Thomas Vote Is a New Weapon for the GOP.” National Journal, 26 October: 2634.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. 1992. “Race, Gender and the Supreme Court.” The American Prospect 8: 64.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 1992. “Invisible Woman.” The American Prospect 8: 81.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate, Office of Senator Howell Heflin. 1991. “Statement of Senator Howell Heflin Regarding the Confirmation of Judge Clarence Thomas to be an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court,” September 26: 5.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, Isabel. 1992. “Cracking the Club.” The New York Times, 19 March.Google Scholar