Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T22:05:53.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scholar, Witness, or Activist? The Lessons and Dilemmas of an AIDS Research Agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Patricia Siplon*
Affiliation:
Saint Michael's College

Extract

The study of AIDS, as a disease, a social problem, or, in my case, as a political phenomenon is necessarily difficult and invasive. Learning about AIDS requires invasion of the most private spheres of peoples' lives, involves watching people at their most vulnerable, and often requires becoming closely involved with people whose lives and circumstances are far away from the researcher's own comfort zone. As the title of this essay suggests, my research has led me to take on a variety of roles; first, in order to gather the information I sought and, later, because of the information I had gathered. Roughly speaking, these roles can be characterized with respect to the distance of the researcher from the subject matter. As a scholar, I endeavored, particularly in the early stages of my research, to hold myself apart from what I saw and to compare my findings against those of other researchers. However, as time moved on, I found myself increasingly playing two other roles, roles I have come to characterize as witness and activist. My efforts to lessen the distance between the subjects of my research and myself resulted from both practical and personal motivations. As a practical matter, like many other social scientists, I quickly discovered that I had far greater access to information—in the form of written documents, interviews, and observation opportunities—as an insider. Personally I found myself wanting to contribute what I could to help solve, or at least lessen the severity of, the problems unfolding all around me.

As I have moved closer to the subjects of my research, and to the perspectives they hold, I have been forced to confront head-on a perennial dilemma of scholars: objectivity. How does one study an issue “objectively,” particularly when the issue is fraught with controversy? Does taking a side render future observations invalid? Is there some magic line between researcher and subject that is not to be crossed? If so, where is it?

The findings presented below represent what I have discovered about interest organizing and political activism in the context of AIDS.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author would like to gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments of Tom Baldino, Bill Grover, Kristin Novotny, and Deborah Stone.

References

Altman, Dennis. 1986. AIDS in the Mind of America: The Social, Political and Psychological Impact of a New Epidemic. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Arno, Peter, and Feiden, Karen. 1992. Against the Odds: The Story of AIDS Drug Development, Politics and Profit. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard. F. Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kayal, Philip. 1993. Bearing Witness: Gay Men's Health Crisis and the Politics of AIDS. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Bruce. Good Intentions: How Big Business and the Medical Establishment Are Corrupting the Fight against AIDS, Alzheimer's, Cancer and More. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles, and Guillen, Mauro. 1990. The AIDS Disaster: The Failure of Organizations in New York and the Nation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard. 1979. Poor People's Movements. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Shilts, Randy. 1987. And the Band Played On: Politics, People and the AIDS Epidemic. New York: Saint Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar