Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:44:05.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reverse Research Design: Research Design in the Undergraduate Classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2021

Phillip M. Ayoub*
Affiliation:
Occidental College, USA

Abstract

Teaching research design is a core component of a political science curriculum. In our pedagogy, we often do two things separately: expecting students to (1) read and digest the work of established scholars, and (2) explore their own interests in the form of a research design or research paper. In a reverse research design, I bridge these two components with a pedagogical tool. I use a published book or article relevant to the course and students retrace the published author’s process, placing themselves in the author’s shoes. Rewinding some years, students imagine that they are this author writing a grant proposal to conduct the (now-completed) study. This helps students to work through the steps of research design, putting aside until later the more intimidating hurdle of articulating their own research question and project. This article explains reverse research design and describes the teaching resources and methods for implementation.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ayoub, Phillip M., and Rose, Deondra E.. 2016. “The Scholarly Importance of Studying Issues Related to One’s Own Identity.” Inside Higher Ed, April 14. www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/04/14/scholarly-importance-studying-issues-related-ones-own-identity-essay.Google Scholar
Baglione, Lisa. 2008. “Doing Good and Doing Well: Teaching Research-Paper Writing by Unpacking the Paper.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (3): 595602.Google Scholar
Becker, Megan. 2019. “Importing the Laboratory Model to the Social Sciences: Prospects for Improving Mentoring of Undergraduate Researchers.” Journal of Political Science Education 16 (2): 113.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Julie, Knutson, Katherine, and Gilbert, Christopher. 2012. “Adding an Integrated Library Component to an Undergraduate Research Methods Course.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (1): 112–18.Google Scholar
McCarty, Timothy. 2019. “Methods Can Be Murder: A Metaphorical Framework for Teaching Research Design.” Journal of Political Science Education September:1–18.Google Scholar
Monogan, James. 2017. “A Review of Textbooks for Teaching Undergraduate Methods.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2): 549–53.Google Scholar
Parker, Jonathan. 2010. “Undergraduate Research Methods Training in Political Science: A Comparative Perspective.” PS: Political Science & Politics 43 (1): 121–25.Google Scholar
Thies, Cameron, and Hogan, Robert. 2005. “The State of Undergraduate Research Methods Training in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38 (2): 293–97.Google Scholar
Warburton, Jeff, and Madge, Clare. 1994. “The Snakes and Ladders of Research: Using a Board Game to Teach the Pitfalls of Undergraduate Research Design.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 18 (2): 237–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zepeda-Millán, Chris. 2017. Latino Mass Mobilization: Immigration, Racialization, and Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar