Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:24:17.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Real-Time Polling Technology in a Public Opinion Course

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2006

Cindy D. Kam  and
Barbara Sommer
Cindy D. Kam
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Barbara Sommer
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many instructors face challenges in engaging students in lecture courses. In the fall of 2004, we incorporated innovative, real-time polling technology into an upper-division political science course on Public Opinion. The polling technology channeled students' technological savvy in the service of several pedagogical goals. The technology increased student engagement and reinforced the substance of the course material. It also provided students with topically relevant experiences in answering survey questions and allowed students to feel more comfortable in expressing their opinions during discussions.We thank Victoria Cross, James Fowler, Ethan Scheiner, Walter Stone, and Elizabeth Zechmeister for helpful suggestions. Funding for the technology was generously provided by the Undergraduate Instructional Improvement Program, supported by the vice provost–undergraduate studies at the University of California, Davis.

Type
THE TEACHER
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 113 - 117
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berinsky, Adam J. 1999. “The Two Faces of Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1209–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, S. W., and M. I. Brown. 2004. “Increasing Interactivity in Lectures Using an Electronic Voting System.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20: 81–94.Google Scholar
Noelle-Neuman, Elisabeth. 1974. “The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion.” Journal of Communication 24 (2): 43–51.Google Scholar
Noelle-Neuman, Elisabeth. 1993. The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion, Our Social Skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stuart, S. A. J., M. I. Brown, and S. W. Draper. 2004. “Using an Electronic Voting System in Logic Lectures: One Practitioner's Application.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20: 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (4481): 453–8.Google Scholar