Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T00:03:03.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Primary/Secondary Democracy Distinction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Herbert H. Werlin
Herbert H. Werlin*
Affiliation:
Independent Consultant
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Just as sportsmanship is essential for competitive sports, statesmanship is necessary for competitive democracy. This obvious assertion, which I followed with a distinction between primary and secondary democracy, was greeted with some misunderstanding when it was presented at a 1993 American Political Science Association workshop on democratization headed by Gabriel Almond. Because this distinction appears to be controversial, let me defend it here as a way to overcome some of the quandaries found in the literature on democracy; to link democracy to development; and to suggest more fruitful approaches to encouraging democracy than elections.

Professor Almond's response to my primary/secondary democracy distinction was to point out that those participating in his workshop had used a definition of democracy presented by Dahl (1971) in his book on polyarchy, emphasizing two dimensions: widespread participation and contestation (including competition and conflict). This seems to me a one-sided definition (focusing almost exclusively on what I call “primary democracy”), leaving out the aspects emerging from secondary democracy: a mutual respect among competing groups and between leaders and followers and consensus on governmental goals and procedures.

Without secondary democracy, primary democracy tends to be meaningless, much like an Olympics without the necessary conditions for sporting events and rules for participating, competing, and officiating. Another way of making the distinction here presented would be the “two ideals of democracy” suggested by Mansbridge (1991, 7): “one based on conflict, the other on commonality.”

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 530 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agbese, Pito O. 1990. “The Military and the Privatization of Repression in Nigeria.” Conflict 10:239–266.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey, Portney, Kent E., and Thomson, Ken. 1993. The Rebirth of Urban Democracy. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Cernea, Michael M. 1991. “Sociologists in a Development Agency: Observations from the World Bank.” World Bank Reprint Series, 463.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dia, Mamadou. 1993. A Governance Approach to Civil Service Reform in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour. 1989. “Preface.” In Democracy in Developing Countries. Vol. 4: Latin America, eds. Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Dillinger, William. 1991. Urban Property Tax Reform: Guidelines and Recommendations. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Euben, J. Peter. 1993. “Democracy Ancient and Modern.” PS: Political Science and Politics 26:478–480.Google Scholar
Farvacque, Catherine, and McAuslan, Patrick. 1992. Reforming Urban Land Policies and Institutions in Developing Countries. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnett, Harry, Merrill, Sally, and Miller, John. 1988. Urbanization in African Development: Issues and Opportunities. Washington: USAID/Abt Associates.Google Scholar
Golden, Tim. 1993. “Where Politics and Poverty Intersect in Nicaragua, Signposts Are Missing.” New York Times. 31 August: A7.Google Scholar
Gulhati, Ravi. 1991. “Impasse in Zambia.” Public Administration and Development 11:239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulhati, Ravi, and Nallari, Raj. 1990. Successful Stabilization and Recovery in Mauritius. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Harrison, Paul. 1987. The Greening of Africa. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1992. “Democracy: From City States to a Cosmopolitan Order?” In Prospects for Democracy, ed. Held, David. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Imam, Ayesha, and Ibrahim, Jibrin. 1992. “The Democratic Process: Problems and Prospects.” Development 3:17–19.Google Scholar
Jreisat, Jamel E. 1991. “The Organizational Perspective in Comparative and Development Administration.” In Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, ed. Frazmand, Ali. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Koo, Hagan. 1987. “The Interplay of State, Social Class, and the World System in East Asian Development: The Cases of South Korea and Taiwan.” In The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism, ed. Deyo, Frederic C.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lee-Smith, Diana. 1989. “Urban Management in Nairobi: A Case Study of the Matatu Mode of Public Transport.” In Africans Cities in Crisis, eds. Stren, Richard E. and White, Rodney R.. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Lemarchand, Rene. 1993. “Africa's Troubled Transitions.” Journal of Democracy 3(4):99–102.Google Scholar
Llosa, M.V. 1987. “In Defense of the Black Market.” New York Times Magazine. 22 February: 46–47.Google Scholar
Lorch, Donatella. 1994. “In Zambia, a Legacy of Graft and Drug Scandal Taints Democratic Reforms.” New York Times. 30 January: A10.Google Scholar
Mabogunje, Akin L. 1992. Perspective on Urban Land and Urban Management Policies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1991. “Politics. In The Transition to Democracy: Proceedings of a Workshop, ed. National Research Council. Washington: USAID.Google Scholar
Marc, Alexandre, Graham, Carol, and Schacter, Mark. 1993. Social Action Programs and Social Funds. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Mason, John P. 1990. A.I.D.'s Experience with Democratic Initiatives: A Review of Regional Programs in Legal Institution Building. Washington: USAID.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1958. Political Parties. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Nelson, Joan M. (with Eglinton, Stephanie J.). 1992. Encouraging Democracy: What Role for Conditioned Aid? Washington: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
Operations Policy Department 1994. Governance: The World Bank's Experience. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Roth, Gabriel, and Wynne, George. 1982. Free Enterprise Urban Transportation. Washington: Council for International Urban Liaison.Google Scholar
Salmen, Lawrence F. 1987. Listen to the People: Participant-Observer Evaluation of Development Projects. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Sangmpam, S. N. 1992. “The Overpoliticized State and Democratization.” Comparative Politics 24:402–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Victor A. 1961. Modem Organizations. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
USAID, 1991. Democracy and Governance. Washington: USAID.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldo, Dwight. 1980. The Enterprise of Public Administration. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp.Google Scholar
Werlin, Herbert H. 1992. “Linking Decentralization and Centralization: A Critique of the New Development Administration.” Public Administration and Development 12:223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1960. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1992. Poverty Reduction Handbook. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar