Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T12:54:21.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preconception vs. Observation, or the Contributions of Rational Choice Theory and Area Studies to Contemporary Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Chalmers Johnson
Chalmers Johnson*
Affiliation:
Japan Policy Research Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 170 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Martin. 1992. Imposters in the Temple: American Intellectuals are Destroying our Universities and Cheating our Students of Their Future. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1996. “Letter from the President: Area Studies and the Discipline.” APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section on Comparative Politics. 7(1): 1–2.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James. 1963. The Fire Next Time. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Bender, Thomas. 1997. “Politics, Intellect, and the American University.” Daedalus (Winter).Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and Rosenbluth, Frances. 1993. “The Electoral Fortunes of Legislative Factions in Japan.” American Political Science Review 87(3):577–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greider, William. 1997. One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Heilbrunn, Jacob. 1996. “Yew Turn: How the Right Embraced ‘Asian Values.’” The New Republic, 9 December.Google Scholar
Hollinger, David A. 1997. “The Disciplines and the Identity Debates, 1970–1996.” Daedalus (Winter).Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1994. “The Myth of Asia's Miracle,” Foreign Affairs 73(6): 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuttner, Robert. 1997. “The Limits of Markets.” The American Prospect (March-April).Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1997. “Political Science in the 1940s and 1950s.” Daedalus (Winter).Google Scholar
Richardson, James L. 1997. “Economics: Hegemonic Discourse.” Quadrant [Melbourne] (March).Google Scholar
Solow, Robert M. 1997. “How Did Economics Get That Way and What Way Did It Get?” Daedalus (Winter).Google Scholar
Soros, George. 1997. “The Capitalist Threat.” The Atlantic Monthly (February).Google Scholar
Suehiro, Akira. 1997. “Thinktanks and the Evolution of ‘Chiiki Kenkyu,’ Japan's Area Studies.” Social Science Japan (February).Google Scholar