Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T07:34:00.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Consultants and the Extension of Party Goals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Robin Kolodny
Affiliation:
Temple University
Angela Logan
Affiliation:
Temple University

Extract

Political consultants are seen as influential actors in American politics who may effect policy long after their service on an election has concluded. Many observers of the consulting industry (see, for example, Shea 1996; Sabato 1981) have suggested that the use of political consultants has been especially bad for political parties, contributing to their decline. Proponents of the party decline thesis maintain that consultants weaken parties by giving candidates independent support bases for conducting their campaigns, creating a campaign climate where individual candidates take the voting public's focus away from party platforms. But consultants have become prominent because the parties cannot always offer up-to-date technical services and close attention to local situations. Some political scientists suggest that political consultants can assist parties in attaining their goals by providing the highly professional and technical services to party candidates that party organizations themselves cannot (Luntz 1988). Further, political consultants tend to work in concert with political parties because they depend on the parties for a supply of clients (Sabato 1981; Luntz 1988). Here we explore another dimension of the consultant-political party relationship: the role political parties play in training political consultants. We hypothesize that contemporary political consultants are likely to have had close links (such as prior employment) with a political party since the 1970s, when parties began adopting new technologies and training their employees to use them.

Consultant background vis-a-vis political parties can lead to two very different notions of the effect of consultant activity on our politics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownstein, Ronald. 1986. “The Long Green Line.” National Journal, May 3, 10381042.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. 1988. Party Campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1985/1986. “Party Organization and Distribution of Campaign Resources: Republicans and Democrats in 1982.” Political Science Quarterly 100:603–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luntz, Frank I. 1988. Candidates, Consultants, and Campaigns: The Style and Substance of American Electioneering. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sabato, Larry J. 1981. The Rise Of Political Consultants: New Ways of Winning Elections. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Salmore, Barbara G., and Salmore, Stephen A.. 1989. Candidates, Parties, and Campaigns: Electoral Politics In America. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph. 1984. “On the Theory of Party Organization.” Journal of Politics 46:369400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, Daniel M. 1996. Campaign Craft: The Strategies, Tactics, and Art of Political Campaign Management. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar