Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T15:08:16.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leadership in the Slow Lane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2022

Christopher J. Deering*
Affiliation:
The George Washington University

Extract

While slightly unconventional, the earnest request of Indiana Republican Sen. Dan Quayle's six-year-old daughter (Conconi, 1985, p. B3) is nothing new to Senate Majority Leader Robert Dole (R-Kan.). Indeed, Majority Whip Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) has said that the senators Dole must lead are “like children lining up in the elementary school classroom asking when they can go to the bathroom” (Granat, 1983, p. 1429). They are all impatient, and they all want their way.

When Quayle was elected in 1980 no one suggested that it would be a 9-to-5 job. And it has not been. Late night sessions, filibusters, endless quorum calls, repeated and repetitive votes numbering in the hundreds, crowded schedules, and yes, even the plaintive request of a six-year-old daughter conspire to make life difficult for a senator. On this particular night, Quayle could make his daughter's performance. Not so much because of the note she had sent to Dole, but because Dole and other Republican senators were scheduled to roast Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.) and then quickly return to the House to hear President Reagan report on his Geneva summit meeting with Mikhail Gorbachev.

As majority leader, Dole must play to at least five closely related constituencies and overcome numerous obstacles to succeed. He must represent Reagan. He must represent his Republican Party colleagues. He must protect the interests of the 22 Republican Senate seats at risk in the 1986 election—including his own. He must represent and to some extent promote the interests of the entire Senate. And, of course, he must represent the people of Kansas. It need hardly be added that the interests of these constituencies frequently conflict.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Conconi, Chuck. November 22, 1985. Personalities. Washington Post.Google Scholar
Granat, Diane. July 16, 1983. Ruling Rambunctious Senate Proves to Be Thorny Problem for Republican Leader Baker. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, pp. 14271432.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1985. Changing Time Constraints on Congress: Historical Perspectives on the Use of Cloture. In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, pp. 393413.Google Scholar
Plattner, Andy. May 25, 1985a. The Lure of the Senate: Influence and Prestige. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, pp. 991998.Google Scholar
Plattner, Andy. June 29, 1985b. Dole on the Job: Keeping the Senate Running. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, pp. 12691273.Google Scholar
Pryor, David. October 31, 1985. Operation of the Senate. Congressional Record, pp. S14491–S14498.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1985. Senate Styles and Senate Decision-Making, 1955–1980. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, La.CrossRefGoogle Scholar