Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T04:05:17.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to Test Cultural Theory: Suggestions for Future Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2011

Marco Verweij ,
Shenghua Luan  and
Mark Nowacki
Marco Verweij
Affiliation:
Jacobs University
Shenghua Luan
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Mark Nowacki
Affiliation:
Singapore Management University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This symposium highlighted the relevance of the cultural theory (CT) pioneered by anthropologists Mary Douglas, Steve Rayner, and Michael Thompson and political scientists Aaron Wildavsky and Richard Ellis for explaining political phenomena. In this concluding article, we suggest ways in which CT can be further tested and developed. First, we describe how the theory has been applied thus far and some of the achievements of these applications. Then, we examine some of the challenges revealed by this research. Finally, we discuss ways of applying CT that promise to help meet these challenges. These methods include nesting case studies and combining case study and survey research, simulations, experiments, and approaches from social neuroscience.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 745 - 748
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bales, Robert F. 2002. Social Interaction Systems. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Bechara, Antoine, and Damasio, Antonio. 2005. “The Somatic Marker Hypothesis: A Neural Theory of Economic Decision.” Games and Economic Behavior 52: 336–72.Google Scholar
Bleda, Mercedes, and Shackley, Simon. Forthcoming. “Simulation Modelling as a Theory Building Tool: The Formation of Risk Perceptions.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 15.Google Scholar
Braman, Don, Kahan, Dan M., and Grimmelmann, James. 2005. “Modeling Facts, Culture and Cognition in the Gun Debate.” Social Justice Research 18 (3): 283–304.Google Scholar
Chai, Sun-Ki, Dorj, Dolgorsuren, Hampton, Kyle, and Liu, Ming. 2011. “The Role of Culture in Public Goods and Other Experiments.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4), this issue.Google Scholar
Coughlin, Richard M., and Lockhart, Charles. 1998. “Grid-Group Theory and Political Ideology.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 10 (1): 33–58.Google Scholar
Dake, Karl. 1992. “Myths of Nature.” Journal of Social Issues 48 (4): 21–37.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 2010. Self Comes to Mind. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1999. “Four Cultures: The Evolution of a Parsimonious Model.” GeoJournal 43 (3): 411–15.Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard J., and Thompson, Fred. 1997. “Culture and the Environment in the Pacific Northwest.” American Political Science Review 91 (4): 885–97.Google Scholar
Gastil, John, Braman, Don, Kahan, Dan, and Slovic, Paul. 2011. “The Cultural Orientation of Mass Political Opinion.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4), this issue.Google Scholar
Grendstad, Gunnar. 1999. “A Political Cultural Map of Europe.” GeoJournal 43 (3): 463–75.Google Scholar
Grendstad, Gunnar, and Selle, Per. 1997. “Cultural Theory, Postmaterialism, and Environmental Attitudes.” In Culture Matters: Essays in Honor of Aaron Wildavsky, eds. Ellis, R.J. and Thompson, M.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gross, Jonathan, and Rayner, Steve. 1985. Measuring Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hendriks, Frank. 1999. Public Policy and Political Institutions. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ingram, Dave. 2010. “ABC Risk Attitude Report.” New York: Willis Re.Google Scholar
Ingram, Dave, Tayler, Paul, and Thompson, Michael. Forthcoming. “Surprise, Surprise: From Neo-Classical Economics to E-Life.” ASTIN Bulletin 42.Google Scholar
Jones, Michael D. 2011. “Leading the Way to Compromise? Cultural Theory and Climate Change Opinion.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4), this issue.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. 2008. “Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk.” Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 73. New Haven, CT: Yale Law School.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1982. Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed Method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 435–52.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2004. “The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscience for Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 691–706.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael, and Mooney, Chrstiopher Z.. 2011. “Pracademics: Mixing an Academic Career with Practical Politics.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (2): 251–53.Google Scholar
Olli, Eero. 2011. “Rejected Cultural Biases Shape Our Political Beliefs.” PhD diss. University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Rayner, Steve. 1992. “Cultural Theory and Risk Analysis.” In Social Theories of Risk, ed. Krimsky, S.. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Ripberger, Joseph T., Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Herron, Kerry G.. 2011. “How Cultural Orientations Create Shifting National Security Coalitions on Nuclear Weapons and Terrorist Threats in the American Public.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4), this issue.Google Scholar
Rippl, Susanne. 2002. “Cultural Theory and Risk Perception.” Journal of Risk Research 5 (2): 147–65.Google Scholar
Swedlow, Brendon, Kall, Denise, Zhou, Zheng, Hammitt, James K., and Wiener, Jonathan B.. 2009. “Theorizing and Generalizing about Risk Assessment and Regulation through Comparative Nested Analysis of Representative Cases.” Law & Policy 31 (2): 236–69.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael. 2008. Organizing and Disorganizing: A Dynamic and Non-Linear Theory of Institutional Emergence and Its Implications. Axminster, UK: Triarchy.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael, Ellis, Richard J., and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1990. Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Turner, Robert, and Whitehead, Charles. 2008. “How Collective Representations Can Change the Structure of the Brain.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (10-11): 43–57.Google Scholar
Verweij, Marco. 2011. Clumsy Solutions for a Wicked World: How to Improve Global Governance. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Verweij, Marco, and Thompson, Michael, eds. 2006. Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: Governance, Politics and Plural Perceptions. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1987. Choosing Institutions by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation.” American Political Science Review 87 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron, and Dake, Karl. 1990. “Theories of Risk Perception: Who Fears What and Why.” Daedalus 119 (4): 41–60.Google Scholar
Willer, David, and Walker, Henry A.. 2007. Building Experiments: Testing Social Theory. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar