Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T16:00:25.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divided Party Control: Does It Make a Difference?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

David R. Mayhew
David R. Mayhew*
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 637 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Browning, Robert X. 1986. Politics and Social Welfare Policy in the United States. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Conlan, Timothy. 1985. New Federalism: Intergovernmental Reform from Nixon to Reagan. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Cutler, Lloyd N. 1988. “Some Reflections About Divided Government.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 18: 485–92.Google Scholar
Davidson, Roger H. 1988. “The New Centralization on Capitol Hill.” Review of Politics 50: 345–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derthick, Martha. 1979. Policymaking for Social Security. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Dunar, Andrew J. 1984. The Truman Scandals and the Politics of Morality. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jo. 1975. The Politics of Women's Liberation. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Higgs, Robert. 1987. Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr., 1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 5th ed. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Lampman, Robert J. 1984. Social Welfare Spending: Accounting f or Changes from 1950 to 1978. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946—1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ogul, Morris S. 1976. Congress Oversees the Bureaucracy: Studies in Legislative Supervision. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Ripley, Randall B. 1983. Congress: Process and Policy. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Scher, Seymour. 1963. “Conditions for Legislative Control.” Journal of Politics 25: 526–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1968. Politics and Policy: The Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson Years. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1988–1989. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 103: 613–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, David. 1981. “The ‘New’ Social Regulation in Historical and Comparative Perspective.” In McCraw, Thomas K., ed., Regulation in Perspective: Historical Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weidenbaum, Murray L. 1977. Business, Government, and the Public. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar