Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T01:25:48.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Democratic Responsiveness? Untangling the Links Between Public Opinion and Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Benjamin I. Page*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University

Extract

Abundant evidence has been produced to demonstrate substantial empirical relationships between public opinion (in the sense of survey-measured collective policy preferences) and public policy in the United States and elsewhere. Policy outputs—what governments do—tend to correspond fairly closely with what surveys say their citizens want them to do. In my view, however, a number of important research questions remain largely open. Answers to some of them are crucial to deciding what, if anything, opinion-policy congruence has to do with democratic theory.

Open Questions

1. How much impact does public opinion actually have on policy making? In particular, how much of the observed relationship is causal rather than spurious, and how much causal impact proceeds from opinion to policy rather than the reverse? If public opinion simply tends to swing into line behind whatever policies decision makers come up with, or if some third force drives both opinion and policy, the implications for democratic theory are rather different from what they would be if public opinion exerted a powerful influence on government action.

2. Under what circumstances is this impact larger or smaller? What kinds of political systems are most responsive to their citizens? How much difference do free elections make? High levels of economic development, education, and communications? Vigorous party competition? Parliamentary versus presidential systems? Federalism?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher H. 1975. “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.” American Political Science Review 69: 1218–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22:475510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1991. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Buildup.” American Political Science Review 85: 457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cnudde, Charles F., and McCrone, Donald J. 1966. “The Linkage Between Constituency Attitude and Congressional Voting Behavior: A Causal Model.” American Political Science Review 60: 6672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1978. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller-Stokes Representation Data.” American Journal of Political Science 22:511–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C. Jr., and McIver, John P. 1989. “Political Parties, Public Opinion, and State Policy in the United States.” American Political Science Review 83:728–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C. Jr., and McIver, John P. 1994. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Steve, Shapiro, Robert Y., and Page, Benjamin I. 1990. “The Dynamics of Public Opinion and Policy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Forbes, Hugh Donald, and Tufte, Edward R. 1968. “A Note of Caution in Causal Modelling.” American Political Science Review 62:12581264 and “Communication,” 1269–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Thomas W. 1989. “The Politics of Failure: Strategic Nuclear Arms Control, Public Opinion and Domestic Politics in the United States, 1945–1985.” Ph.D. diss. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Hartley, Thomas, and Russett, Bruce. 1992. “Public Opinion and the Common Defense: Who Governs Military Spending in the United States?American Political Science Review 86:905–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinckley, Ronald H. 1992. People, Polls, and Policy Makers: American Public Opinion and National Security. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
Jackson, John E. 1979. “Statistical Estimation of Possible Response Bias in Close-ended Issue Questions.” Political Methodology 6:393423.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R. 1992. “The Recoil Effect: Public Opinion and Policy Making in the United States and Britain.” Comparative Politics 24:199217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R. 1993. The Health of Nations: Public Opinion and the Making of American and British Health Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusnitz, Leonard A. 1984. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: America's China Policy, 1949–1979. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57:4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y. 1983. Effects of Public Opinion on Policy. American Political Science Review 77:175–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y. 1992. The Rational Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., Shapiro, Robert Y., Gronke, Paul W., and Rosenberg, Robert M. 1984. “Constituency, Party, and Representation in Congress.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48:741–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Richard, ed. 1993. Public Opinion in U.S. Foreign Policy: The Controversy over Contra Aid. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Weissberg, Robert. 1978. “Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 72: 535547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. Jr., Erikson, Robert S., and McIver, John P. 1987. “Public Opinion and Policy Liberalism in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 31:9801001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar